Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of the performance of backpropagation and radial basis function neural networks in predicting the drill flank wear

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study compares the performance of backpropagation neural network (BPNN) and radial basis function network (RBFN) in predicting the flank wear of high speed steel drill bits for drilling holes on mild steel and copper work pieces. The validation of the methodology is carried out following a series of experiments performed over a wide range of cutting conditions in which the effect of various process parameters, such as drill diameter, feed-rate, spindle speed, etc. on drill wear has been considered. Subsequently, the data, divided suitably into training and testing samples, have been used to effectively train both the backpropagation and radial basis function neural networks, and the individual performance of the two networks is then analyzed. It is observed that the performance of the RBFN fails to match that of the BPNN when the network complexity and the amount of data available are the constraining factors. However, when a simpler training procedure and reduced computational times are required, then RBFN is the preferred choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thangaraj A, Wright PK (1988) Computer-assisted prediction of drill failure using in-process measurements of thrust force. J Eng Ind, Trans ASME 110:192–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Noori-Khajavi A, Komanduri R (1995) Frequency and time domain analyses of sensor signal in drilling-II, investigation on some problems associated with sensor signal. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 35:795–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lin SC, Ting CJ (1995) Tool wear monitoring in drilling using force signals. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 180:53–60

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lin SC, Ting CJ (1996) Drill wear monitoring using neural network. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 36:465–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dimla DE Jr, Lister PM, Leighton NJ (1997) Neural network solutions to the tool condition monitoring problem in metal cutting: a critical review of methods. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 37(9):1219–1241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee BY, Liu HS, Tarng YS (1998) Modeling and optimization of drilling process. J Mater Process Technol 74:149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Elhachimi M, Torbaty S, Joyot P (1999) Mechanical modeling of high speed drilling in predicting torque and thrust. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 39:553–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu HS, Lee BY, Tarng YS (2000) In process prediction of corner wear in drilling operations. J Mater Process Technol 101:152–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Choudhury SK, Raju G (2000) Investigation into crater wear in drilling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40:887–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ertunc HM, Loparo KA, Ocak H (2001) Tool wear condition monitoring in drilling operations using hidden markov models (HMMs). Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41:1363–1384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ertunc HM, Loparo KA (2001) A decision fusion algorithm for tool wear condition monitoring in drilling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41:1347–1362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Davim JP, Antonio CAC (2001) Optimal drilling of particulate metal matrix composites based on experimental and numerical procedures. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41:21–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsao CC (2002) Prediction of flank wear of different coated drills for JIS SUS 304 stainless steel using neural network. J Mater Process Technol 123:354–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Brophy B, Kelly K, Byrne G (2002) AI-based condition monitoring of the drilling process. J Mater Process Technol 124:305–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim HY, Ahnn JH, Kim SH, Takata S (2002) Real-time drill wear estimation based on spindle motor power. J Mater Process Technol 124:267–273

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jantunen E (2002) A summary of methods applied to tool condition monitoring in drilling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42:997–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hocheng H, Tsao CC (2003) Comprehensive analysis of delamination in drilling of composite materials with various drill bits. J Mater Process Technol 140:335–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mahfouz IA (2003) Drilling wear detection and classification using vibration signals and artificial neural network. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43:707–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nouari M, List G, Girot F, Coupard D (2003) Experimental analysis and optimization of tool wear in dry machining of aluminium alloys. Wear 255:1359–1368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wong SV, Hamouda AMS (2003) Machinability data representation with artificial neural network. J Mater Process Technol 138:538–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sonar DK, Dixit US, Ojha DK (2005) The application of a radial basis function neural network for predicting the surface roughness in a turning process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 36:400–451

    Google Scholar 

  22. Singh AK, Panda SS, Pal SK, Chakraborty D (2005) Predicting drill wear using an artificial neural network. Int J Adv Manuf Technol DOI: 10.1007/s00170-004-2376-0 (in press)

  23. Haykin S (2003) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation, 2nd edn. Pearson Education

  24. Moody J, Darken CJ (1989) Fast learning in networks of locally tuned processing units. Neural Comput 1(2):281–294

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Surjya K. Pal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garg, S., Pal, S.K. & Chakraborty, D. Evaluation of the performance of backpropagation and radial basis function neural networks in predicting the drill flank wear. Neural Comput & Applic 16, 407–417 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-006-0065-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-006-0065-7

Keywords

Navigation