Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bounding set calculation for neural network-based output feedback adaptive control systems

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evaluating the bounding set of dynamic systems subject to direct neural-adaptive control is a critical issue in applications where the control system must undergo a rigorous verification process in order to comply with certification standards. In this paper, the boundedness problem is addressed for a comprehensive class of uncertain dynamic systems. Several common but unnecessary approximations that are typically performed to simplify the Lyapunov analysis have been avoided in this effort. This leads to a more accurate and general formulation of the bounding set for the overall closed loop system. The conditions under which boundedness can be guaranteed are carefully analyzed; additionally, the interactions between the control design parameters, the ‘Strictly Positive Realness’ condition, and the shape and dimensions of the bounding set are discussed. Finally, an example is presented in which the bounding set is calculated for the neuro-adaptive control of an F/A-18 aircraft, along with a numerical study to evaluate the effect of several design parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Narendra KS, Annaswamy AM (1989) Stable adaptive control. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

  2. Ioannou PA, Sun J (1996) Robust adaptive control. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

  3. Hornik K, Stinchombe M, White H (1989) Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Netw 2(5):359–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Park J, Sandberg IW (1991) Universal approximation using radial-basis-function networks. Neural Comput 3(2):246–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Narendra KS, Parthasarathy K (1990) Identification and control of dynamical systems using neural networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 7(1):4–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lewis FL, Yesildirek A, Liu K (1996) Multilayer neural-net robot controller with guaranteed tracking performance. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 7(2):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kim BS, Calise AJ (1997) Nonlinear flight control using neural networks. J Guid Control Dyn 20(1):26–33

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Calise AJ, Hovakimyan N, Idan M (2001) Adaptive output feedback control of nonlinear systems using neural networks. Automatica 37(8):1201–1211

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hovakimyan N, Nardi F, Calise AJ (2002) A novel error observer-based adaptive output feedback approach for control of uncertain systems. IEEE Trans Automat Control 47(8):1310–1314

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Campa G, Sharma M., Calise AJ, Innocenti M (2000) Neural network augmentation of linear controllers with application to underwater vehicles. American Control Conference, Chicago

  11. Sharma M, Calise AJ (2001) Neural network augmentation of existing linear controllers. AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Montreal, Canada, Aug 6–9

  12. Chen W, Li J (2008) Decentralized output-feedback neural control for systems with unknown interconnections. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cyber Part B 38(1):258–266

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hayakawa T, Haddad WM, Hovakimyan N (2008) Neural network adaptive control for a class of nonlinear uncertain dynamical systems with asymptotic stability guarantees. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 9(1):80–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cao C, Hovakimyan N (2008) Design and analysis of a novel L1 adaptive control architecture with guaranteed transient performance. IEEE Trans Automatic Control 53(2):586–591

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Inc (IEEE), Software Engineering Standards Committee (2004) IEEE standard for software verification and validation. IEEE 1012-2004, New York

  16. RTCS and EUROCAE (1992) Software considerations in airborne systems and equipment certification. Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics, Washington, DC

  17. Farrell J, Sharma M, Polycarpou M (2005) Backstepping-based flight control with adaptive function approximation. J Guid Control Dyn 28(6):1089–1102

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kim N, Calise AJ (2007) Several extensions in methods for adaptive output feedback control. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 8(2):482–494

    Google Scholar 

  19. Maciejowski JM (1989) Multivariable feedback design. Addison-Wesley, Wokingham

  20. Sontag E (1993) Neural networks for control. In: Trentelman HL, Willems JC (eds) Essays on control: perspectives in the theory and its applications (Groningen), vol 14, pp 339–380

  21. Jordan C (1960) Calculus of finite differences. Chelsea Publication Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. JB Pomet, Praly L (1992) Adaptive nonlinear regulation: estimation from the Lyapunov equation. IEEE Trans Autom Control 37(6)

  23. Kosmatopoulos EB, Christodoulou MA (1997) High-order neural networks for the learning of robot contact surface shape. IEEE Trans Neural Network 13(3):451–455

    Google Scholar 

  24. Malini Lamego M (2001) Adaptive structures with algebraic loops. IEEE Trans Neural Network 128(1):33–42

    Google Scholar 

  25. Campa G, Mammarella M, Cukic B, Gu Y, Napolitano MR, Fuller E (2008) Calculation of bounding sets for neural network based adaptive control systems. AIAA Guidance Navigation and Control Conference, Honolulu

  26. Wang C, Hill DJ (2006) Learning from neural control. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 17(1):130–146

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kurzhanskiy AA, Varaiya P Ellipsoidal toolbox 2006–2007. http://code.google.com/p/ellipsoids/

  28. Eick RS (2003) A reconfiguration scheme for flight control adaptation to fixed-position actuator failures. MS Thesis, University Of Florida. http://purl.fcla.edu/fcla/etd/UFE0001265, Gainesville, FL 32611, 2003

Download references

Acknowledgments

Support for the 1st author was provided by the NASA IV&V Facility, Fairmont WV, trough the Office of Safety and Mission Assurance, Grant NCC5-685. The authors would also like to thank John J. Burken, for providing the inspiration to pursue this effort.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mathworks, 400 Continental Blvd, El Segundo, CA, 90245, USA

    Giampiero Campa

  2. Department of Electronics and Information Engineering, University of Perugia, 06100, Perugia, Italy

    Mario Luca Fravolini

  3. Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26506/6106, USA

    Marco Mammarella & Marcello R. Napolitano

Authors
  1. Giampiero Campa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mario Luca Fravolini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marco Mammarella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marcello R. Napolitano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Luca Fravolini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Campa, G., Fravolini, M.L., Mammarella, M. et al. Bounding set calculation for neural network-based output feedback adaptive control systems. Neural Comput & Applic 20, 373–387 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-010-0404-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-010-0404-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation