Skip to main content
Log in

Vibration signal analysis for electrical fault detection of induction machine using neural networks

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fault detection is desirable for increasing machinery availability, reducing consequential damage, and improving operational efficiency. Many of these faulty situations in three-phase induction motors originate from an electrical source. Vibration signal analysis is found to be sensitive to electrical faults. However, conventional methods require detailed information on motor design characteristics and cannot be applied effectively to vibration diagnosis because of their nonadaptability and the random nature of the vibration signals. This paper presents the development of an online electrical fault detection system that uses neural network modeling of induction motor in vibration spectra. The short-time Fourier transform is used to process the quasi-steady vibration signals for continuous spectra so that the neural network model can be trained. The electrical faults are detected from changes in the expectation of modeling errors. Experimental observations show that a robust and automatic electrical fault detection system is produced whose effectiveness is demonstrated while minimizing the triggering of false alarms due to power supply imbalance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Singh GK, Al Kazzaz SAS (2003) Induction machine drive condition monitoring and diagnostic research—a survey. Electr Power Syst Res 64:145–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liang B, Iwnicki SD, Ball AD (2003) Asymmetrical stator and rotor faulty detection using vibration, phase current and transient speed analysis. Mech Syst Signal Process 17(4):857–869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Thompson WT (2009) On-line motor current signature analysis prevents premature failure of large induction motor drives. Maint Asset Manage 24(3):30–35

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pillay P, Xu Z (1996) Motor current signature analysis. Industry applications conference. Thirty-first IAS annual meeting IAS ‘96, vol 1, pp 587–594

  5. Munoz RA, Nahmias CG (1994) Mechanical vibration of three-phase induction motors fed by nonsinusoidal currents. Proceeding of the international power electronics congress, pp 166–172

  6. Zamarron A, Arjona MA (2010) Detection of stator-winding turn-to-turn faults in induction motors, based on virtual instrumentation. Int J Elect Eng Educ 47(1):63–72

    Google Scholar 

  7. Riley CM, Lin BK, Habetler GT, Schoen RR (1998) A method for sensorless on-line vibration monitoring of induction machines. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 34:1240–1245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lagan PA (1999) Vibration monitoring. Proceedings of the IEE colloquium on understanding your condition monitoring, pp 1–11

  9. Singh GK, Ahmed SAKS (2004) Vibration signal analysis using wavelet transform for isolation and identification of electrical faults in induction machine. Electr Power Syst Res 68:119–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hewlett P (1997) Effective machinery measurement using dynamic signal analyzers. Application note, pp 243-1

  11. Betta G, Liguori C, Paolillo A, Pietrosanto A (2002) A DSP-based FFT-analyzer for the fault diagnosis of rotating machine based on vibration analysis. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 51(6):1316–1322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Atiya AF, Palos AG (2000) New results on recurrent network training: unifying the algorithms and accelerating convergence. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 13:765–786

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tavner PJ, Penman J (1987) Condition monitoring of electrical machines. Research Studies Press, Letchworth

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kim K, Parlos AG (2003) Reducing the impact of false alarms in induction motor fault diagnosis. ASME J Dyn Syst Meas Control 125:80–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim K, Parlos AG (2002) Model-based fault diagnosis of induction motors using non-stationary signal segmentation. Mech Syst Signal Process 16:223–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mohanti N (1987) Signal processing signal filtering detection. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gao XZ, Ovaska SJ (2000) Motor fault detection using Elman neural network with genetic algorithm-aided training. 2000 IEEE international conference in systems, man, and cybernetics, vol 4, pp 2386–2392

  18. Norgaard M, Ravn O, Poulsen KN, Hansen KL (2000) Neural networks for modeling and control of dynamic systems. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kil To Chong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Su, H., Chong, K.T. & Ravi Kumar, R. Vibration signal analysis for electrical fault detection of induction machine using neural networks. Neural Comput & Applic 20, 183–194 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-010-0512-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-010-0512-3

Keywords

Navigation