Skip to main content
Log in

Tracking of the plasma states in a nuclear fusion device using SOMs

  • EANN 2009
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Knowledge discovery consists of finding new knowledge from databases where dimension, complexity, or amount of data is prohibitively large for human observation alone. The need for efficient data visualization and clustering is often faced, for instance, in the analysis, monitoring, fault detection, or prediction of various engineering plants. In this paper, two clustering techniques, K-means and Self-Organizing Maps, are used for the identification of characteristic regions for plasma scenario in nuclear fusion experimental devices. The choice of the number of clusters, which heavily affects the performance of the mapping, is firstly faced. Then, the ASDEX Upgrade Tokamak high-dimensional operational space is mapped into lower-dimensional maps, allowing to detect the regions with high risk of disruption, and, finally, the current process state and its history in time are visualized as a trajectory on the Self-Organizing Map, in order to predict the safe or disruptive state of the plasma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Murakami M, Callen JD, Berry LA (1976) Some observation on maximum density in Tokamaks experiments. Nucl Fusion 16:347–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fielding SJ, Hugill J, McCracken GM, Paul JWM, Prentice R, Stott PE (1977) High-density discharges with gettered Torus walls in DITE. Nucl Fusion 17:1382–1385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lloyd SP (1982) Least squares quantization in PCM. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 2:129–137

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Kohonen MT (1989) Self-organization and associative memory. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jain AK, Murty MN, Flynn PJ (1999) Data clustering: a review. ACM Comput Surv 31:264–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. MacQueen JB (1967) Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: 5th Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability proceedings, Berkeley, University of California Press, vol 1, pp 281–297

  7. Vesanto J, Himberg J, Alhoniemi E, Parhankangas J (2000) SOM toolbox for Matlab 5. Helsinki University of Technology, Finland. http://www.cis.hut.fi/somtoolbox/package/papers/techrep.pdf

  8. Alhoniemi E (2002) Unsupervised pattern recognition methods for exploratory analysis of industrial process data. Doctoral Dissertation, Lab. of Computer and Information Science. Helsinki University of Technology, Finland

  9. Laine S (2003) Using visualization, variable selection and feature extraction to learn from industrial data. Doctoral Dissertation, Laboratory of Computer and Information Science, University of Technology, Helsinki, Finland

  10. Oja M, Kaski S, Kohonen T (2003) Bibliography of self-organizing map (SOM) papers: 1998–2001 addendum. Neural Comput Surv (3):1–156

  11. Corona F, Mulas M, Baratti R, Romagnoli J (2009) Data derived analysis and inference for an industrial deethanizer. In: IFAC-ADCHEM09 conference proceedings, vol 2, pp 717–723

  12. Ratta GA, Vega J, Murari A, Vagliasindi G (2009) Inspection of disruptive behaviours at JET using Generative Topographic mapping. In: PHYSCON 2009 proceedings, Catania, Italy

  13. Sias G (2007) A disruption prediction system for ASDEX upgrade based on neural networks. PhD dissertation, University of Padova, Italy

  14. Cannas B, Fanni A, Pautasso G, Sias G, Sonato P, Zedda MK, The ASDEX-Upgrade Team (2006) Disruption prediction at ASDEX upgrade using neural networks. In: 33th EPS conference on controlled fusion and plasma physics proceedings, Rome, Italy. http://epsppd.epfl.ch/Roma/pdf/P2_143.pdf

  15. Salvador S, Philip Chan P (2004) Determining the number of clusters/segments in hierarchical clustering/segmentation algorithms. In: 16th IEEE international conference on tools with AI proceedings, pp 576–584

  16. Dubes RC (1987) How many clusters are best? An experiment. Pattern Recognit 20(6):645–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. SOMtoolbox (2005) Adaptive Informatics Research Centre, Helsinky University of Technology, Finland. http://www.cis.hut.fi/projects/somtoolbox/

  18. Davies DL, Bouldin DW (1979) A cluster separation measure. IEEE Trans Pattern Recognit Mach Intell (1):224–227

  19. Dunn J (1974) Well separated clusters and optimal fuzzy partitions. J Cybern (4):95–104

  20. Camplani M, Cannas B, Fanni A, Pautasso G, Sias G, Sonato P, Zedda MK, The ASDEX Upgrade Team (2007) Mapping of the ASDEX upgrade operational space using clustering techniques. In: 34th EPS conference on plasma physics and controlled fusion, Warsaw, Poland

  21. Jolliffe IT (1986) Principal component analysis. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Version 5.2 R (2006) Statistics toolbox software for Matlab5.2. User’s guide: http://www.mathworks.com/access/helpdesk/help/pdf_doc/stats/stats.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Euratom Communities under the contract of Association between EURATOM/ENEA. The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the European Commission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Sias.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Camplani, M., Cannas, B., Fanni, A. et al. Tracking of the plasma states in a nuclear fusion device using SOMs. Neural Comput & Applic 20, 851–863 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-011-0529-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-011-0529-2

Keywords

Navigation