Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A hybrid intelligent optimization method for multiple metal grades optimization

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the most important aspects of metal mine design is to determine the optimum cut-off grades and milling grades which relate to the economic efficiency of enterprises and the service life of mines. This paper proposes a hybrid intelligent framework which is based on stochastic simulations and regression, artificial neural network, and genetic algorithms is employed for grade optimization. Firstly, stochastic simulation and regression are used to simulate the uncertainty relations between cut-off grade and the loss rate. Secondly, BP and RBF network are applied to establish two complex relationships from the four variables of cut-off grade, milling grade, geological grade, and recoverable reserves to lost rate and total cost, respectively, in which, BP is used for the one of lost rate, and RBF is for the other. Meanwhile, the real-coding genetic algorithm is performed to search the optimal grades (cut-off grade and milling grade) and the weights of neural networks globally. Finally, the model has been applied to optimize grades of Daye Iron Mine. The results show there are 6. 6978 milling Yuan added compare to unoptimized grades.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dagdelen K (1992) Cutoff grade optimization. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international symposium on application of computers and operations research in minerals industry, pp 157–165

  2. Dagdelen K (1993) An NPV optimization algorithm for open pit mine design. In: Proceedings of the 24th international symposium on application of computers and operations research in minerals industry, pp 257–263

  3. Lane KF (1988) The economic definition of ore, cut-off grades in theory and practice, 1st edn. Mining Journal Books Limited, London

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dagbert M (1987) Cut-off grades: statistical estimation and reality. CIM Bull 80(898):73–76

    Google Scholar 

  5. Huang GQ, Du ZY (1996) The method of dynamically optimizing cut-off grade and pre-selection grade. Jiangxi Nonferrous Metals 10(4):1–5 (in chinese)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Mishra B (2006) Development of a computer model for determination of cut off grade for metal life rous deposits. J Mines Metals Fuels 54(6–7):147–152

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pan GH, Ming SX, Wang YH et al (2008) Research and application of dynamic optimization method of cut-off grade for ore drawing. Mining Res Development 28(4):6–9 (in chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Asad MW (2007) An optimum cut-off grade policy for open pit mining operations through net present value algorithm considering metal price and cost escalation. Eng Comput 24(7):723–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bascetin A (2007) Determination of optimal cut-off grade policy to optimize NPV using a new approach with optimization factor. J S Afr Inst Mining Metall 107(2):87–94

    Google Scholar 

  10. Poniewierski J, MacSporran G, Sheppard I (2003) Optimisation of cut-off grade at mount is a mines Limited’s Enterprise Mine, Australasian institute of mining and metallurgy publication series. In: Proceedings of 12th international symposium on mine planning and equipment selection n1, pp 531–538

  11. Minnitt RCA (2004) Cut-off grade determination for the maximum value of a small wits-type gold mining operation. J S Afr Inst Mining Metallurgy 104(5):277–283

    Google Scholar 

  12. Demicco RV, Klir GJ (2004) Fuzzy logic in geology. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  13. Singh V, Srivastava AK, Tiwary DN et al (2007) Neural networks and their applications in lithostrati graphic interpretation of seismic data for reservoir characterization. The Leading Edge 26(10):1244–1260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vanlaere W, Buffel P, Lagae G et al (2004) Neural networks for assessing the failure load of a construction. J Comput Appl Math 168(1–2):501–508

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Yu SW, Zhu KJ, Diao FQ (2008) A dynamic all parameters adaptive BP neural networks model and its application on oil reservoir prediction. Appl Math Comput 195(1):66–75

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Whitley D, Starkweather T, Bogart C (1990) Genetic algorithms and neural networks: optimizing connections and connectivity. Parallel Comput 14(3):347–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Torres M, Hervás C, Amador F (2005) Approximating the sheep milk production curve through the use of artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm. Comput Oper Res 32:2653–2670

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Holland JH (1975) Adaptation of natural and artificial system. The university of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shanthi D, Sahoo ZG (2009) Evolving connection weights of artificial neural networks using genetic algorithm with application to the prediction of stroke disease. Int J Soft Comput 4(2):95–102

    Google Scholar 

  20. He Y, Zhu K, Gao S et al (2009) Theory and method of genetic-neural optimizing cut-off grade and grade of crude ore. Expert Systems Applications 36(4):7617–7623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jian A, Zhao D, Sun H et al (2004) Application of evolutionary neural network in optimization of grade of crude ore into concentration plant. Mining Res Dev 24(4):44–46

    Google Scholar 

  22. Minnitt RCA (2004) Cut-off grade determination for the maximum value of a small Wits-type gold mining operation. J S Afr Inst Min Metall 7:277–284

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yegnanarayana B (1999) Artificial neural networks. Prentice-Hall, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  24. Principe JC, Euliano NR, Lefebvre WC (2000) Neural and adaptive systems, fundamentals through simulations. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986) Learning internal representations by error propagation. In: Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL (eds) Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol 1. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 318–362

    Google Scholar 

  26. Moody J, Darken C (1989) Faster learning in networks of locally tuned processing units. Neural Comput 1(2):281–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Er MJ, Wu S, Lu J, Toh HL (2002) Face recognition with radial basis function (RBF) neural networks. Trans Neural Netw 13(3):697–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Goldberg DE (1998) Genetic algorithms in search, optimisation and machine learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gupta RK, Bhunia AK, Roy D (2009) A GA based penalty function technique for solving constrained redundancy allocation problem of series system with interval valued reliability of components. J Comput Appl Math 232(2):275–284

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Kristinsson K, Dumont GA (1992) System identification and control using genetic algorithm. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 22(5):1033–1046

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Nan J, Zhiye Z, Liqun R (2003) Design of structural modular neural networks with genetic algorithm. Adv Eng Softw 34(1):17–24

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Ballester PJ, Carter JN (2003) Real-parameter genetic algorithms for finding multiple optimal solutions in multi-modal optimization. In: Cantupaz E et al. (eds) Proceedings of 5th annual genetic and evolutionary computation conference (GECCO 2003). Springer, Berlin, pp 706–717

  33. Herrera F, Lozano M, Sánchez AM (2005) Hybrid crossover operators for real-coded genetic algorithms: an experimental study. Soft Comput 9(4):280–298

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Deb K, Beyer H (2001) Self-adaptive genetic algorithms with simulated binary crossover. Evolutionary Computation 9(2):197–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rajendra M, Jena PC, Raheman H (2009) Prediction of optimized pretreatment process parameters for biodiesel production using ANN and GA. Fuel 88(5):868–875

    Google Scholar 

  36. McAdams HH, Arkin A (1998) Simulation of prokaryotic genetic circuits. Ann Rev Biophy Biomol Struc 27:99–224

    Google Scholar 

  37. Miura S, Shimokawa T, Nomuraa T (2008) Stochastic simulations on a model of circadian rhythm generation. BioSystems 93(1–2):133–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kohlmorgen U, Schmeck H, Haase K (1999) Experiences with fin-grainedparallel genetic algorithms. Ann Oper Res 90:203–219

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Srinivas M, Patnaik LM (1994) Adaptive probabilities of crossover and mutation in genetic algorithms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 24(4):656–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was fully supported by National Natural Science Foundation Grant No. 70573101 of the People’s Republic of China and Wuhan iron and steel (group) corp. the Research Foundation Outstanding Young Teachers, China University of Geosciences(Wuhan)CUGQNW0901, and the Special Fund for Basic Scientific Research of Central Colleges, China University of Geosciences(Wuhan).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shiwei Yu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yu, S., Zhu, K. & He, Y. A hybrid intelligent optimization method for multiple metal grades optimization. Neural Comput & Applic 21, 1391–1402 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-011-0593-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-011-0593-7

Keywords

Navigation