Skip to main content
Log in

Learning to memorize input--output mapping as bifurcation in neural dynamics: relevance of multiple timescales for synapse changes

  • ICONIP2010
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When a certain input--output mapping is memorized, the neural dynamics provide a prescribed neural activity output that depends on the external input. Without such an input, neural states do not provide memorized output. Only upon input, memory is recalled as an attractor, while neural activity without an input need not fall on such attractor but can fall on another attractor distinct from the evoked one. With this background, we propose that memory recall occurs as a bifurcation from the spontaneous attractor to the corresponding attractor matching the requested target output, as the strength of the external input is increased. We introduce a neural network model that enables the learning of such memories as bifurcations. After the learning process is complete, the neural dynamics are shaped to generate a prescribed target in the presence of each input. We find that the capacity of such memory depends on the timescales for the neural activity and synaptic plasticity. The maximal memory capacity is achieved at a certain relationship between the timescales, where the residence time at previous learned targets during the learning process is minimized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Willshaw DJ, von derMalsburg C (1976) How patterned neural connections can be set up by self-organization. Royal Soc Lond Proc Ser B 194:431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hopfield JJ (1984) Neurons with graded response have collective computational properties like those of two-state neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81(10):3088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kohonen T (1982) Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biol Cybern 43(1):59

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Barto AG, Sutton RS, Brouwer PS (1981) Associative search network: a reinforcement learning associative memory. Biol Cybern 40(3):201

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Rumelhart DE, Mcclelland JL (1986) Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol 1. Foundations. MIT Press, Cambridge

  6. Luczak A, Bartho P, Marguet SL, Buzsaki G, Harris KD (2007) Sequential structure of neocortical spontaneous activity in vivo. Proc Nat Acad Sci 104(1):347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Luczak A, Bartho P, Harris KD (2009) Spontaneous events outline the realm of possible sensory responses in neocortical populations. Neuron 62(3):413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fox MD, Corbetta M, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, Raichle ME (2006) Spontaneous neuronal activity distinguishes human dorsal and ventral attention systems. Proc Nat Acad Sci 103(26):10046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Arieli A, Sterkin A, Grinvald A, Aertsen A (1996) Dynamics of ongoing activity: explanation of the large variability in evoked cortical responses. Science 273(5283):1868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mazor O, Laurent G (2005) Transient dynamics versus fixed points in odor representations by Locust Antennal Lobe projection neurons. Neuron 48(4):661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kurikawa T, Kaneko K (2011) Learning shapes spontaneous activity itinerating over memorized states. PLoS ONE 6(3): e17432. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017432

  12. Xie X, Seung HS (2004) Learning in neural networks by reinforcement of irregular spiking. Phys Rev E 69(4):41909

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Jay TM (2003) Dopamine: a potential substrate for synaptic plasticity and memory mechanisms. Prog Neurobiol 69(6):375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Reynolds JNJ, Hyland BI, Wickens JR (2001) A cellular mechanism of reward-related learning. Nature 413(6851):67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fusi S, Drew PJ, Abbott LF (2005) Cascade models of synaptically stored memories. Neuron 45(4):599

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is partially supported by the people of Japan, via a Grant-in-Aid for scientific research (No.21120004) from MEXT, Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomoki Kurikawa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kurikawa, T., Kaneko, K. Learning to memorize input--output mapping as bifurcation in neural dynamics: relevance of multiple timescales for synapse changes. Neural Comput & Applic 21, 725–734 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-011-0650-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-011-0650-2

keywords

Navigation