Skip to main content
Log in

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Prediction microhardness profile of functionally graded steels by ANFIS

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article was retracted on 25 August 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

In the present study, the Vickers microhardness profile of ferritic and austenitic functionally graded steel produced by electroslag remelting process has been modeled by adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). To produce functionally graded steels, a spot-welded electrode that consists of two slices of plain carbon steel and austenitic stainless steel was used. Functionally graded steel containing graded layers of ferrite and austenite may be fabricated via diffusion of alloying elements during remelting stage. Vickers microhardness profile of the specimen has been obtained experimentally and modeled with ANFIS. To build the model for graded ferritic and austenitic steels, training, testing and validation using, respectively, 174 and 120 experimental data were conducted. According to the input parameters, the Vickers microhardness of each layer was predicted. The training, testing and validation results in the ANFIS models have shown a strong potential for predicting microhardness profile of both graded ferritic and austenitic steels. It was shown that the Vickers microhardness can be predicted by ANFIS in the range of the examined data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 25 August 2020

    The Editor-in-Chief has retracted this articl

References

  1. Sankar BV (2001) An elasticity solution for functionally graded beams. Compos Sci Technol 61:689–696

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jin ZH, Paulino GH, Dodds RH Jr (2003) Cohesive fracture modeling of elastic–plastic crack growth in functionally graded materials. Eng Fract Mech 70:1885–1912

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carpenter RD, Liang WW, Paulino GH, Gibeling JC, Munir ZA (1999) Fracture testing and analysis of a layered functionally graded Ti/TiB beam in 3-point bending. Mater Sci Forum 308–311:837–842

    Google Scholar 

  4. Williamson RL, Rabin BH, Drake JT (1993) Finite element analysis of thermal residual stresses at graded ceramic-metal interfaces. J Appl Phys 74:1310–1320

    Google Scholar 

  5. Giannakopoulos AE, Suresh S, Finot M, Olsson M (1995) Elastoplastic analysis of thermal cycling: layered materials with compositional gradients. Acta Metall Mater 43:1335–1354

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kolednik O (2000) The yield stress gradient effect in inhomogeneous materials. Int J Sol Struct 37(5):781–808

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Aghazadeh Mohandesi J, Shahosseinie MH (2005) Transformation characteristics of functionally graded steels produced by electroslag remelting. Metall Mater Trans A 36A:3471–3476

    Google Scholar 

  8. Aghazadeh Mohandesi J, Shahosseinie MH, Parastar Namin R (2006) Tensile behavior of functionally graded steels produced by electroslag remelting. Metall Mater Trans 37A:2125–2132

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nazari A, Aghazadeh Mohandesi J (2010) Modelling impact resistance of functionally graded steels with crack divider configuration. Mater Sci Technol 26:1377–1383

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nazari A, Aghazadeh Mohandesi J (2009) Impact energy of functionally graded steels with crack divider configuration. J Mater Sci Technol 25(6):847–852

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nazari A, Aghazadeh Mohandesi J, Riahi S (2010) Modeling impact energy of functionally graded steels in crack divider configuration using modified stress-strain curve data. Int J Damage Mech. doi:10.1177/1056789510397073

  12. Nazari A, Aghazadeh Mohandesi J, Hamid Vishkasogheh M, Abedi M (2011) Simulation of impact energy in functionally graded steels. Comput Mater Sci 50:1187–1196

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nazari A, Aghazadeh Mohandesi J (2010) Impact energy of functionally graded steels in crack arrester configuration. J Mater Eng Perform 19:1058–1064

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nazari A, Milani AA, Zakeri M (2011) Modeling ductile to brittle transition temperature of functionally graded steels by artificial neural networks. Comput Mater Sci 50:2028–2037

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nazari A, Milani AA (2011) Ductile to brittle transition temperature of functionally graded steels. Int J Damage Mech. doi:10.1177/1056789511398270

  16. Nazari A, Milani AA (2011) Modeling ductile-to-brittle transition temperature of functionally graded steels by gene expression programming. Int J Damage Mech. doi:10.1177/1056789511406561

  17. Nazari A, Milani AA (2011) Ductile to brittle transition temperature of functionally graded steels with crack arrester configuration. Mater Sci Eng A 528:3854–3859

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nazari A, Milani AA (2011) Modeling ductile to brittle transition temperature of functionally graded steels by fuzzy logic. J Mater Sci 46:6007–6017

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nazari A, Aghazadeh Mohandesi J, Riahi S (2011) Modified modeling fracture toughness of functionally graded steels in crack divider configuration. Int J Damage Mech 20:811–831

    Google Scholar 

  20. Aghazadeh Mohandesi J, Nazari A, Hamid Vishkasogheh M, Abedi M (2010) Modeling fracture toughness of functionally graded steels in crack divider configuration. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 18:075007

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nazari A, Aghazadeh Mohandesi J, Riahi S (2011) Fracture toughness of functionally graded steels. J Mater Eng Perform. doi:10.1007/s11665-011-9945-9

  22. Nazari A, Aghazadeh Mohandesi J, Riahi S (2011) Modeling fracture toughness of functionally graded steels in crack arrester configuration. Comput Mater Sci 50:1578–1586

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nazari A, Aghazadeh Mohandesi J (2011) Modeling tensile strength of oblique layer functionally graded austenitic steel. Comput Mater Sci 50:1425–1431

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nazari A, Riahi S (2010) Effect of layer angle on tensile behavior of oblique layer functionally graded steels. Turk J Eng Environ Sci 34:17–24

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nazari A, Aghazadeh Mohandesi J, Tavareh S (2011) Microhardness profile prediction of a graded steel by strain gradient plasticity theory. Comput Mater Sci 50:1781–1784

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nazari A, Aghazadeh Mohandesi J, Tavareh S (2011) Modeling tensile strength of austenitic graded steel based on the strain gradient plasticity theory. Comput Mater Sci 50:1791–1794

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nazari A, Mojtahed Najafi SM (2011) Prediction Charpy impact energy of bcc and fcc functionally graded steels in crack divider configuration by strain gradient plasticity theory. Comput Mater Sci 50:3178–3183

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nazari A, Mojtahed Najafi SM (2011) Prediction impact behavior of functionally graded steel by strain gradient plasticity theory. Comput Mater Sci 50:3218–3223

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nazari A (2011) Modeling Charpy impact energy of functionally graded steel based on the strain gradient plasticity theory and modified stress–strain curve data. Comput Mater Sci 50:3350–3357

    Google Scholar 

  30. Nazari A (2011) Application of strain gradient plasticity theory to model Charpy impact energy of functionally graded steels. Comput Mater Sci 50:3410–3416

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nazari A (2011) Strain gradient plasticity theory to predict the input data for modeling Charpy impact energy in functionally graded steels. Comput Mater Sci 50:3442–3449

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nazari A (2012) Simulation of impact energy in functionally graded steels by mechanism-based strain gradient plasticity theory. Comput Mater Sci 51:13–19

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nazari A (2011) Simulation Charpy impact energy of functionally graded steels by modified stress–strain curve through mechanism-based strain gradient plasticity theory. Comput Mater Sci 51:225–232

    Google Scholar 

  34. Nazari A (2012) Application of strain gradient plasticity theory to model Charpy impact energy of functionally graded steels using modified stress–strain curve data. Comput Mater Sci 51:281–289

    Google Scholar 

  35. Nazari A (2011) Modeling fracture toughness of ferritic and austenitic functionally graded steel based on the strain gradient plasticity theory. Comput Mater Sci 50:3238–3244

    Google Scholar 

  36. Nazari A (2011) Strain gradient plasticity theory for modeling JIC of functionally graded steels. Comput Mater Sci 50:3403–3409

    Google Scholar 

  37. Nazari A, Riahi S (2010) Computer-aided prediction of physical and mechanical properties of high strength cementitious composite containing Cr2O3 nanoparticles. Nano 5(5):301–318

    Google Scholar 

  38. Nazari A, Riahi S (2011) Prediction split tensile strength and water permeability of high strength concrete containing TiO2 nanoparticles by artificial neural network and genetic programming. Compos Part B Eng 42:473–488

    Google Scholar 

  39. Nazari A, Riahi S (2011) Computer-aided design of the effects of Fe2O3 nanoparticles on split tensile strength and water permeability of high strength concrete. Mater Des 32:3966–3979

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Nazari A, Didehvar N (2011) Modeling impact resistance of aluminum-epoxy laminated composites by ANFIS. Compos Part B Eng 42:1912–1919

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Jang JSR (1993) ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cyber 23(3):665–685

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sarldemir M (2009) Predicting the compressive strength of mortars containing metakaolin by artificial neural networks and fuzzy logic. Adv Eng Soft 40(9):920–927

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Topcu IB, Sarldemir M (2008) Prediction of mechanical properties of recycled aggregate concretes containing silica fume using artificial neural networks and fuzzy logic. Comp Mater Sci 42(1):74–82

    Google Scholar 

  44. Jang JSR, Sun CT (1995) Nuro-fuzzy modeling and control. Proc IEEE 83(3):378–406

    Google Scholar 

  45. Guzelbey IH, Cevik A, Erklig A (2006) Prediction of web crippling strength of cold-formed steel sheetings using neural networks. J Constr Steel Res 62:962–973

    Google Scholar 

  46. Guzelbey IH, Cevik A, Gögüs MT (2006) Prediction of rotation capacity of wide flange beams using neural networks. J Constr Steel Res 62:950–961

    Google Scholar 

  47. Cevik A, Guzelbey IH (2008) Neural network modeling of strength enhancement for Cfrp confined concrete cylinders. Build Environ 43:751–763

    Google Scholar 

  48. Cevik A, Guzelbey IH (2007) A soft computing based approach for the prediction of ultimate strength of metal plates in compression. Eng Struct 29(3):383–394

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ramezanianpour AA, Sobhani M, Sobhani J (2004) Application of network based neuro-fuzzy system for prediction of the strength of high strength concrete. Amirkabir J Sci Technol 5(59-C):78–93

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ramezanianpour AA, Sobhani J, Sobhani M (2004) Application of an adaptive neurofuzzy system in the prediction of HPC compressive strength. In: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on engineering computational technology. Civil-Comp Press, Lisbon

  51. Topcu IB, Sarldemir M (2008) Prediction of compressive strength of concrete containing fly ash using artificial neural network and fuzzy logic. Comp Mater Sci 41(3):305–311

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Nazari.

About this article

Cite this article

Bohlooli, H., Nazari, A. & Kaykha, M.M. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Prediction microhardness profile of functionally graded steels by ANFIS. Neural Comput & Applic 22, 847–858 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-011-0775-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-011-0775-3

Keywords

Navigation