Skip to main content
Log in

Extending extension theory for classifying data with numerical values

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The extension theory (ET) is one of the simplest and most attractive pattern classification methods. However, it has difficulty determining the classical domain. In addition, the traditional extended relational function used in extension theory does not provide very useful summaries of asymmetrical data. This study proposes a modified extension theory (MET) to overcome these shortcomings. The MET applies the largest sphere concept to determine the range of the classical domains and incorporates the information about the data distribution when calculating the relevance of an element belonging to a set. Experimental results indicate that the MET consistently achieved better or comparable results than the traditional ET. The MET also produces a classifier with satisfactory classification accuracy compared with well-known classifiers (e.g., decision trees and k-nearest neighbor).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cai W (1983) The extension set and incompatibility problem. J Sci Explor 1:610–614

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chao K-H, Li C-J (2010) An intelligent maximum power point tracking method based on extension theory for PV systems. Expert Syst Appl 37:1050–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Duer S (2011) Qualitative evaluation of the regeneration process of a technical object in a maintenance system with an artificial neural network. Neural Comput Appl 20(5):741–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gao J, Lin P, Yang Y, Wang P, Zheng C (2010) Real-time removal of ocular artifacts from EEG based on independent component analysis and manifold learning. Neural Comput Appl 19(8):1217–1226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu M, Lo SM, Hu BQ, Zhao CM (2009) On the use of fuzzy synthetic evaluation and optimal classification for computing fire risk ranking of buildings. Neural Comput Appl 18(6):643–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lopez JJ, Cobos M, Aguilera E (2011) Computer-based detection and classification of flaws in citrus fruits. Neural Comput Appl 20(7):975–981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Koonce DA, Tsai S-C (2000) Using data mining to find patterns in genetic algorithm solutions to a job shop schedule. Comput Ind Eng 38:361–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Oztekin A, Kong ZJ, Delen D (2011) Development of a structural equation modeling-based decision tree methodology for the analysis of lung transplantations. Decis Support Syst 51(1):155–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang M-H (2004) Application of extension theory to vibration fault diagnosis of generator sets. IEE Proc Gener Transm Distrib 151(4):503–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang M-H, Hung C-P (2003) Extension neural network and its applications. Neural Netw 16:779–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang M-H, Tseng Y-F, Chen H-C, Chao K-H (2009) A novel clustering algorithm based on the extension theory and genetic algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 36:8269–8276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ye J (2009) Application of extension theory in misfire fault diagnosis of gasoline engines. Expert Syst Appl 36:1217–1221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yilmaz S, Arici AA, Feyzullahoglu E (2011) Surface roughness prediction in machining of cast polyamide using neural network. Neural Comput Appl 20(8):1249–1254

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheng-Hsiang Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, CH. Extending extension theory for classifying data with numerical values. Neural Comput & Applic 23, 161–167 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-011-0795-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-011-0795-z

Keywords

Navigation