Abstract
The term “water quality” is used to describe the condition of water, including its chemical, physical, and biological characteristics. Modeling water quality parameters is a very important aspect in the analysis of any aquatic systems. Prediction of surface water quality is required for proper management of the river basin so that adequate measure can be taken to keep pollution within permissible limits. Accurate prediction of future phenomena is the life blood of optimal water resources management. The artificial neural network is a new technique with a flexible mathematical structure that is capable of identifying complex non-linear relationships between input and output data when compared to other classical modeling techniques. Johor River Basin located in Johor state, Malaysia, which is significantly degrading due to human activities and development along the river. Accordingly, it is very important to implement and adopt a water quality prediction model that can provide a powerful tool to implement better water resource management. Several modeling methods have been applied in this research including: linear regression models (LRM), multilayer perceptron neural networks and radial basis function neural networks (RBF-NN). The results showed that the use of neural networks and more specifically RBF-NN models can describe the behavior of water quality parameters more accurately than linear regression models. In addition, we observed that the RBF finds a solution faster than the MLP and is the most accurate and most reliable tool in terms of processing large amounts of non-linear, non-parametric data.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmed AN, Elshafie A, Karim O, Jaffar O (2009) Evaluation the efficiency of radial basis function neural network for prediction of water quality parameters. Eng Intell Syst 17(4):221–231
Bishop CM (1996) Neural networks for pattern recognition, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Biswas AK (1981) Models for water quality management. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York
Chau KW (1992) An expert system for the design of gravity-type vertical seawalls. Eng Appl Artif Intell 5(4):363–367
Chau KW, Yang WW (1993) Development of an integrated expert system for fluvial hydrodynamics. Adv Eng Softw 17(3):165–172
Chau KW, Zhang XN (1995) An expert system for flow routing in a river network. Adv Eng Softw 22(3):139–146
Chau K (2006) A review on integration of artificial intelligence into water quality modeling. Mar Pollut Bull 52:726–733
Chen Q, Mynett AE (2003) Integration of data mining techniques and heuristic knowledge in fuzzy logic modelling of eutrophication in Taihu Lake. Ecol Model 162(1/2):55–67
Dogan E, Sengorur B, Koklu R (2009) Modeling biological oxygen demand of the Melen River in Turkey using an artificial neural network technique. J Environ Manag 90:1229–1235
Department of Environment (DOE) (2003) Water quality management in Malaysia. DOE Documents, Kuala Lumpur
El-Shafie A, Najah AA, Karim O (2009) Application of neural network for scour and air entrainment prediction. International conference on computer technology and development 2, art. no. 5360151, pp 273–277
El-Shafie A, Reda Taha M, Noureldin AA (2007) Neuro-fuzzy model for inflow forecasting of the Nile river at Aswan High Dam. Water Resour Manag 21(3):533–556
El-Shafie A, Jaafer O, Seyed A (2011) Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system based model for rainfall forecasting in Klang River, Malaysia. Int J Phys Sci 6(12):2875–2888
El-Shafie AH, El-Shafie A, El Mazoghi HG, Shehata A, Taha MR (2011) Artificial neural network technique for rainfall forecasting applied to Alexandria, Egypt. Int J Phys Sci 6(6):1306-1316
Einax JW, Aulinger A, Tumpling WV, Prange A (1999) Quantitative description of element concentrations in longitudinal river profiles by multiway PLS models. Fres J Anal Chem 363:655–661
Freeman JA, Skapura DM (1991) Neural networks algorithms, applications, and programming techniques. Addison-Wesley, Reading
Grayson RB, Finlayson BL, Gippel CJ, Hart BT (1996) The potential of field turbidity measurements for the computation of total phosphorus and suspended solids loads. J Environ Manag 47(3):257
Grubert JP (2003) Acid deposition in the eastern United States and neural network predictions for the future. J Environ Eng Sci 2(2):99–109
Güldal V, Tongal H (2010) Comparison of recurrent neural network, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and stochastic models in Eirdir lake level forecasting. Water Resour Manag 24:105–128
Elhatip H, Aydin Komur M (2008) Evaluation of water quality parameters for the Mamasin dam in Aksaray City in the central Anatolian part of Turkey by means of artificial neural networks. Environ Geol 53:1157–1164. doi:10.1007/s00254-007-0705-y
Haykin S (1999) Neural networks: comprehensive foundation. Prentice-hall, Upper Saddle River
Hornik K, White H (1989) Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Netw 2:359–366
Hull V, Parrella L, Falcucci M (2008) Modelling dissolved oxygen dynamics in coastal lagoons. Ecol Model 2:468–480
Kasabov NK (1996) Foundations of neural networks, fuzzy systems, and knowledge engineering. MIT Press, Cambridge
Lek S, Delacoste M, Baran P, Dimopoulos I, Lauga J, Aulagnier S (1996) Application of neural networks to modeling nonlinear relationships in ecology. Ecol Model 90:39–52
Maier HR, Dandy GC (2000) Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: a review of modeling issues and applications. Environ Model Softw 15:101–124
Makarynskyy O (2004) Improving wave predictions with artificial neural networks. Ocean Eng 31:709–724
Mehta R, Jain SK (2009) Optimal operation of a multi-purpose reservoir using neuro-fuzzy technique. Water Resour Manag 23(3):509–529
Najah A, Elshafie A, Karim OA, Jaffar O (2009) Prediction of Johor River water quality parameters using artificial neural net- 575 works. Eur J Sci Res 28(3):422–435 ISSN 1450-X
Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part 1: a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10(3):282–290
Olden JD, Jackson DA (2001) Fish-habitat relationships in lakes: gaining predictive and explanatory insight by using artificial neural networks. Trans Am Fish Soc 130:878–897
Ömer Faruk D (2010) A hybrid neural network and ARIMA model for water quality time series prediction. Eng Appl Artif Intell 23(4):586–594
Palani S, Liong SY, Tkalich P (2008) An ANN application for water quality forecasting. Mar Pollut Bull 56:1586–1597
Reckhow KH (1999) Water quality prediction and probability network models. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 56:1150–1158
Rumelhart D, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986) Learning internal representations by error propagation. In: Rumelhart DE, McCelland JL (eds) Parallel distributed processing vol 1 chap. 8. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass
Xiang SL, Liu ZM, Ma LP (2006) Study of multivariate linear regression analysis model for ground water quality prediction. Guizhou Sci 24(1):60–62
Wang X, Yin Z-Y (1997) Using GIS to assess the relationship between land use and water quality at a watershed level. Environ Int 23(1):103–114
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the Department Of Environment for providing the required data for developing this research and Dr. Sundarambal Palani for her insight and guidance throughout this research. This research was supported by the research grant for the second and third authors from University Kebangsaan Malaysia UKM-GUP-PLW-08-13-308.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Najah, A., El-Shafie, A., Karim, O.A. et al. Application of artificial neural networks for water quality prediction. Neural Comput & Applic 22 (Suppl 1), 187–201 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-012-0940-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-012-0940-3