Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison and validation of artificial intelligent techniques to estimate intestinal broiler microflora

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was carried out to investigate the ability of major mathematical methods to estimate intestinal broiler microflora population. Artificial neural network (ANN), coactive neuro-fuzzy inference system (CANFIC), and artificial neural network genetic algorithm (ANNGA) were used in this respect. The lactic acid bacteria and Enterobacteriaceae were applied as models of microflora. Input and output variables were considered as time and microflora population, respectively. The best model of ANN, CANFIC, and ANNGA was determined based on the coefficient of determination and root mean square error criteria. The results of the current study have shown that ANN, ANNGA, and CANFIS are accurate methods to estimate lactic acid bacteria and Enterobacteriaceae. The highest accuracy of microflora estimation was related to 7 days of age. The efficiency of intelligent models to lactic acid bacteria and Enterobacteriaceae has shown that ANNGA had better prediction between mentioned models. The models estimated Enterobacteriaceae population better than that for lactic acid bacteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Patterson JA, Burkholder KM (2003) Application of prebiotics and probiotics in poultry production. Poult Sci 82:627–631

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kisi O, Yildirim G (2005) Discussion of ‘estimating actual evapotranspiration from limited climatic data using neural computing technique’ by Sudheer KP, Gosain AK, Ramasastri KS. ASCE J Irrigation Drainage Eng 131(2):219–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Smirnov A, Perez R, Amit-Romach E, Skllan D, Uni Z (2005) Mucin dynamics and microbial populations in chicken small intestine are changed by dietary probiotic and antibiotic growth promoter supplementation. J Nutr 135:187–192

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lan Y, Xun S, Tamminga S, Williams BA, Verstegem MWA, Erdi G (2004) Real-time PCR detection of Lactic acid bacteria in cecal contents of Eimeria tenella-infected broilers fed soybean oligosaccharides and soluble soybean polysaccharides. Poult Sci 83:1696–1702

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barrow PA (1992) Probiotics for chicken. In: Fuller R (ed) Probiotics: the scientific basis. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 229–234

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zoetendal EG, Akkeremans ADL, De Vos WM (1998) Temperature gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of 16S rRNA from human fecal samples reveals stable and host-specific communities of active bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:3854–3859

    Google Scholar 

  7. Apajalahti JHA, Kettuneen A, Holben WE, Nurminrn PH, Rautonen N, Mutanen M (2002) Culture-independent microbial community analysis reveals that inulin in the diet primarily affects previously unknown bacteria in the mouse cecum. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:4986–4995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lu J, Idris U, Harmon B, Hofacre C, Maurer JJ, Lee MD (2003) Diversity and succession of the intestinal bacterial community of the maturing broiler chicken. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:6816–6824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Escalante-Minakata P, Ibarra-Junquera V, Rosu HC, De Leon-Rodriguez A, Gonzalez-Garcia R (2009) Online monitoring of Mezcal fermentation based on redox potential measurements. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 32:47–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hemati Matin HR, Saki AA, Aliarabi H, Shadmani M, Zare Abyane H (2011) Intestinal broiler microflora estimation by artificial neural network. Neural Comput Applic. doi:10.1007/s00521-011-0553-2

    Google Scholar 

  11. Engberg RM, Hedmann MS, Jensen B (2002) The influence of grinding and pelleting of feed on the microbial composition and activity in the digestive tract of broiler chickens. Br Poult Sci 43:569–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Takagi T, Sugeno M (1985) Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control. IEEE Trans Syst 15(1):116–132

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithm in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, p 412

  14. Williams BA, Verstegen MWA, Tamminga S (2001) Fermentation in the large intestine of single-stomached animals and its relationship to animal health. Nutr Res Rev 14:207–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim S, Kim H (20008) Neural networks and genetic algorithm approach for nonlinear evaporation and evapotranspiration modeling. J Hydrology 351:299–317

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Our special thanks to Tarbiat Modares University for providing facilities and financial support for this study. We also wish to thank the Saeed Yakhkeshi for their excellent collaboration.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Asghar Saki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hemati Matin, H.R., Saki, A.A., Bayat Varkeshi, M. et al. Comparison and validation of artificial intelligent techniques to estimate intestinal broiler microflora. Neural Comput & Applic 23, 61–66 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-012-1059-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-012-1059-2

Keywords

Navigation