Skip to main content
Log in

The use of neural networks for the prediction of the settlement of one-way footings on cohesionless soils based on standard penetration test

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, artificial neural networks (ANNs) were used to predict the settlement of one-way footings, without a need to perform any manual work such as using tables or charts. To achieve this, a computer programme was developed in the Matlab programming environment for calculating the settlement of one-way footings from five traditional settlement prediction methods. The footing geometry (length and width), the footing embedment depth, the bulk unit weight of the cohesionless soil, the footing applied pressure, and corrected standard penetration test varied during the settlement analyses, and the settlement value of each one-way footing was calculated for each traditional method by using the written programme. Then, an ANN model was developed for each method to predict the settlement by using the results of the analyses. The settlement values predicted from each ANN model developed were compared with the settlement values calculated from the traditional method. The predicted values were found to be quite close to the calculated values. Additionally, several performance indices such as determination coefficient, variance account for, mean absolute error, root mean square error, and scaled percent error were computed to check the prediction capacity of the ANN models developed. The constructed ANN models have shown high prediction performance based on the performance indices calculated. The results demonstrated that the ANN models developed can be used at the preliminary stage of designing one-way footing on cohesionless soils without a need to perform any manual work such as using tables or charts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shahin MA, Maier HR, Jaksa MB (2002) Predicting settlement of shallow foundations using neural networks. Geotech Geoenviron Eng 128:785–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Maugeri M, Castelli F, Massimino MR, Verona G (1998) Observed and computed settlements of two shallow foundations on sand. Geotech Geoenviron Eng 124:595–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Coduto DP (1994) Foundation design principles and practices. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sowers GF (1970) Introductory soil mechanics and foundations: geo-technical engineering. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Terzaghi K, Peck RD, Mesri G (1996) Soil mechanics in engineering practice, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schmertmann JH (1970) Static cone to compute static settlement over sand. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 96:1032–1043

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yilmaz I, Yüksek AG (2008) An example of artificial neural network application for indirect estimation of rock parameters. Rock Mech Rock Eng 41(5):781–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yilmaz I, Yüksek AG (2009) Prediction of the strength and elasticity modulus of gypsum using multiple regression, ANN, ANFIS models and their comparison. Int J Rock Mech Min 46(4):803–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaynar O, Yilmaz I, Demirkoparan F (2011) Forecasting of natural gas consumption with neural network and neuro fuzzy system. Energy Educ Sci Tech Part A 26:221–238

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yilmaz I, Kaynar O (2011) Multiple regression, ANN (RBF, MLP) and ANFIS models for prediction of swell potential of clayey soils. Expert Syst Appl 38(5):5958–5966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yilmaz I, Marschalko M, Bednarik M, Kaynar O, Fojtova L (2012) Neural computing models for prediction of permeability coefficient of coarse grained soils. Neural Comput Appl 21(5):957–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Erzin Y, Cetin T (2012) The use of neural networks for the prediction of the critical factor of safety of an artificial slope subjected to earthquake forces. Sci Iran 19(2):188–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Erzin Y, Cetin T (2012) The prediction of the critical factor of safety of homogeneous finite slopes using neural networks and multiple regressions. Comput Geosci. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2012.09.003

  14. Choobbasti AJ, Farrokhzad F, Barari A (2009) Prediction of slope stability using artificial neural network (a case study: Noabad, Mazandaran, Iran). Arab J Sci Eng 2:311–319

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sivakugan N, Eckersley JD, Li H (1998) Settlement predictions using neural networks. Aust Civil Eng Trans CE40:49–52

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL (1986) Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol 1. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 318–362

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gul TO (2011) The use of neural networks for the prediction of the settlement of pad and one- way strip footings on cohesionless soils based on standard penetration test. MSc thesis, Celal Bayar University, Manisa (in Turkish)

  18. Meyerhof GG (1965) Shallow foundations. J Soil Mech Found Eng Div ASCE 91:21–31

    Google Scholar 

  19. Terzaghi K, Peck RD (1967) Soil mechanics in foundation engineering practice. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. Parry RHG (1971) A direct method of estimating settlements in sands from standard penetration tests. In: Proceedings of symposium on interaction of structure and foundations, Midland Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering Society, Birmingham, pp 29–37

  21. Peck RB, Hanson WE, Thornburn TH (1974) Foundation engineering. Wiley, NY

    Google Scholar 

  22. Burland JB, Burbidge MC (1985) Settlement of foundations on sand and gravel. Proc Inst Civil Eng 78:1325–1381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Burbidge MC (1982) A case study review of settlements on granular soil. MSc thesis, Imperial College of Science and Technology, University of London, London

  24. Shahin MA, Jaksa MB, Maier HR (2001) Artificial neural network applications in geotechnical engineering. Aust Geomech 36:49–62

    Google Scholar 

  25. Flood I, Kartam N (1994) Neural network in civil engineering. I: principles and understanding. J Comput Civil Eng 8:131–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Twomey M, Smith AE (1997) Validation and verification. In: Kartam N, Flood I, Garrett JH (eds) Artificial neural networks for civil engineers: fundamentals and applications. ASCE, New York, pp 44–64

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stone M (1974) Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. J R Stat Soc B Methodol 36:111–147

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Smith M (1993) Neural networks for modeling. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Shahin MA, Maier HR, Jaksa MB (2004) Data division for developing neural networks applied to geotechnical engineering. J Comput Civil Eng 18:105–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Demuth H, Beale M, Hagan M (2006) Neural network toolbox user’s guide. The Math Works, Inc., Natick

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hornik K, Stinchcombe M, White H (1989) Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Netw 2:359–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Erzin Y (2007) Artificial neural networks approach for swell pressure versus soil suction behavior. Can Geotech J 44:1215–1223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Erzin Y, Rao BH, Singh DN (2008) Artificial neural networks for predicting soil thermal resistivity. Int J Therm Sci 47:1347–1358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Erzin Y, Gumaste SD, Gupta AK, Singh DN (2009) ANN models for determining hydraulic conductivity of compacted fine grained soils. Can Geotech J 46:955–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Erzin Y, Rao BH, Patel A, Gumaste SD, Gupta AK, Singh DN (2010) Artificial neural network models for predicting of electrical resistivity of soils from their thermal resistivity. Int J Therm Sci 49:118–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Erzin Y, Gunes N (2011) The prediction of swell percent and swell pressure by using neural networks. Math Comput Appl 16:425–436

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kanibir A, Ulusay R, Aydan Ö (2006) Liquefaction-induced ground deformations on a lake shore (Turkey) and empirical equations for their prediction. IAEG 2006, paper 362

  38. Erzin Y, Patel A, Singh DN, Tiga MG, Yılmaz I, Srinivas K (2012) Investigations on factors influencing the crushing strength of some Aegean sands. Bull Eng Geol Environ 71:529–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Garson GD (1991) Interpreting neural-network connection weights. AI Expert 6:47–51

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yusuf Erzin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Erzin, Y., Gul, T.O. The use of neural networks for the prediction of the settlement of one-way footings on cohesionless soils based on standard penetration test. Neural Comput & Applic 24, 891–900 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-012-1302-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-012-1302-x

Keywords

Navigation