Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patient admission prediction using a pruned fuzzy min–max neural network with rule extraction

  • Advances in Intelligent Data Processing and Analysis
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A useful patient admission prediction model that helps the emergency department of a hospital admit patients efficiently is of great importance. It not only improves the care quality provided by the emergency department but also reduces waiting time of patients. This paper proposes an automatic prediction method for patient admission based on a fuzzy min–max neural network (FMM) with rules extraction. The FMM neural network forms a set of hyperboxes by learning through data samples, and the learned knowledge is used for prediction. In addition to providing predictions, decision rules are extracted from the FMM hyperboxes to provide an explanation for each prediction. In order to simplify the structure of FMM and the decision rules, an optimization method that simultaneously maximizes prediction accuracy and minimizes the number of FMM hyperboxes is proposed. Specifically, a genetic algorithm is formulated to find the optimal configuration of the decision rules. The experimental results using a large data set consisting of 450740 real patient records reveal that the proposed method achieves comparable or even better prediction accuracy than state-of-the-art classifiers with the additional ability to extract a set of explanatory rules to justify its predictions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Since the number of hyperbox is an integral number, the nearest integral value is reported.

  2. The number of the decision rules is not the same as the number of hyperboxes reported in Table 1 because the number of hyperboxes is the mean of multiple implementations.

  3. We varied the parameters of these four classifiers and found that the accuracies fluctuated slightly.

References

  1. Boyle J, Lind J, Jessup M, Wallis M, Crilly J, Miller P, Green D, Fitzgerald G (2012) Predicting emergency department admissions. Emerg Med J 29:358–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jessup M, Wallis M, Boyle J, Crilly J, Lind J, Green D, Miller P, FitzGerald G (2010) Implementing an emergency department patient admission predictive tool: insights from practice. J Health Organ Manag 24:306–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sun Y, Heng BH, Tay SY, Seo E (2011) Predicting hospital admissions at emergency department triage using routine administrative data. Acad Emerg Med 18:844–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Peck JS, Benneyan JC, Nightingale DJ, Gaehde DA (2012) Predicting emergency department inpatient admissions to improve same-day patient flow. Acad Emerg Med 19:1045–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Leegon J, Jones I, Lanaghan K, Aronsky D (2005) Predicting hospital admission for emergency department patients using a bayesian network. In AMIA Annu Symp Proc, p 1022

  6. Haykin S (1998) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  7. Freund Y, Schapire RE (1997) A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. J Comput Syst Sci 55(1):119–139

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Bishop CM (2006) Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer-Verlag New York Inc, Secaucus

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45(1): 5–32. ISSN 0885–6125.

  10. Breiman L (1984) Classification and regression trees. The Wadsworth and Brooks-Cole statistics-probability series. Chapman & Hall, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Simpson PK (1992) Fuzzy min-max neural networks-part 1: classification. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 3(5):776–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Simpson PK (1993) Fuzzy min-max neural networks—part 2: clustering. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 1(1):32–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Quteishat A, Lim CP (2008) Application of the fuzzy min-max neural networks to medical diagnosis. In Ignac Lovrek, RobertJ. Howlett, and LakhmiC. Jain, editors, Knowledge-based intelligent information and engineering systems, volume 5179 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, pp 548–555

  14. Nandedkar AV, Biswas PK (2009) A granular reflex fuzzy min–max neural network for classification. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 20(7):1117–1134. doi:10.1109/TNN.2009.2016419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Seera M, Lim CP, Ishak D, Singh H (2012) Fault detection and diagnosis of induction motors using motor current signature analysis and a hybrid FMM–CART model. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 23(1):97–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Seera M, Lim CP (2013) Online motor fault detection and diagnosis using a hybrid fmm-cart model. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 99:1–7. doi:10.1109/TNNLS.2013.2280280

    Google Scholar 

  17. Seera M, Lim CP, Ishak D, Singh H (2013) Offline and online fault detection and diagnosis of induction motors using a hybrid soft computing model. Appl Soft Comput 13 (12): 4493–4507. ISSN 1568–4946. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2013.08.002

  18. Zhang H, Liu J, Ma D, Wang Z (2011) Data-core-based fuzzy min–max neural network for pattern classification. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 22(12):2339–2352. doi:10.1109/TNN.2011.2175748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Davtalab R, Dezfoulian MH, Mansoorizadeh M (2014) Multi-level fuzzy min-max neural network classifier. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 25 (3): 470–482. ISSN 2162–237X. doi:10.1109/TNNLS.2013.2275937

  20. Benitez JM, Castro JL, Requena I (1997) Are artificial neural networks black boxes? IEEE Trans Neural Netw 8(5):1156–1164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Taha IA, Ghosh J (1999) Symbolic interpretation of artificial neural networks. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 11(3):448–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Carpenter GA, Tan A (1995) Rule extraction: from neural architecture to symbolic representation. Connect Sci 7:3–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Setiono R, Leow WK, Zurada JM (2002) Extraction of rules from artificial neural networks for nonlinear regression. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 13(3):564–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ishibuchi H, Nozaki K, Yamamoto N, Tanaka H (1994) Construction of fuzzy classification systems with rectangular fuzzy rules using genetic algorithms. Fuzzy Sets Syst 65(2–3): 237–253. ISSN 0165–0114

  25. Ishibuchi H, Nii M, Murata T (1997a) Linguistic rule extraction from neural networks and genetic-algorithm-based rule selection. In: International conference on neural networks vol 4, pp 2390–2395

  26. Ishibuchi H, Murata T, Turksen IBIB (1997b) Single-objective and two-objective genetic algorithms for selecting linguistic rules for pattern classification problems. Fuzzy Sets Syst 89(2):135–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Quteishat A, Lim CP (2008b) A modified fuzzy min-max neural network with rule extraction and its application to fault detection and classification. Appl Soft Comput 8(2):985–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Quteishat A, Lim CP, Tan KS (2010) A modified fuzzy min-max neural network with a genetic-algorithm-based rule extractor for pattern classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 40(3):641–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mitchell M (1998) An introduction to genetic algorithms. MIT Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Zoubir AM, Boashash B (1998) The bootstrap and its application in signal processing. IEEE Signal Process Mag 15(1):56–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Murphy PM, Aha DW (1995) UCI Repository of Machine Learning Databases, (Machine-Readable Data Repository). Dept. Inf. Comput. Sci., Univ. California, Irvine, CA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Ballarat Health Services, Australia, and Victorian Department of Health, Australia, for giving us access to the patient admission dataset.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jin Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, J., Lim, C.P., Creighton, D. et al. Patient admission prediction using a pruned fuzzy min–max neural network with rule extraction. Neural Comput & Applic 26, 277–289 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-014-1631-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-014-1631-z

Keywords

Navigation