Skip to main content
Log in

Bidirectional projection method for multiple attribute group decision making with neutrosophic numbers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neutrosophic numbers are very suitable for expressing indeterminate evaluation information in complex decision-making problems, and then projection measure is a useful method for handling the decision-making problems. However, due to the lack of engineering applications of neutrosophic numbers and some shortcoming implied in general projection measures in some cases. Therefore, the paper proposes a bidirectional projection measure of interval numbers to overcome the shortcoming and extend it to the bidirectional projection measure of neutrosophic numbers, and then develops a bidirectional projection-based multiple attribute group decision-making method with neutrosophic numbers. Through the bidirectional projection measure between each alternative decision matrix and the ideal alternative matrix, all the alternatives can be ranked to select the best one. Finally, an illustrative example demonstrates the application of the proposed method. The effectiveness and advantages of the proposed method are shown by the comparative analysis with existing relative methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Xu ZS, Da QL (2004) Projection method for uncertain multi-attribute decision making with preference information on alternatives. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 3(3):429–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Xu Z (2005) On method for uncertain multiple attribute decision making problems with uncertain multiplicative preference information on alternatives. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 4(2):131–139

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Xu Z, Hu H (2010) Projection models for intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 9(2):267–280

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Fu C, Gao X, Liu M, Liu XY, Han LS, Chen J (2011) GRAP: grey risk assessment based on projection in ad hoc networks. J Parallel Distrib Comput 71(9):1249–1260

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Zheng G, Jing Y, Huang H, Gao Y (2010) Application of improved grey relational projection method to evaluate sustainable building envelope performance. Appl Energy 87(2):710–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xu ZS, Cai XQ (2012) Intuitionistic fuzzy information aggregation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 249–258

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Xu GL, Liu F (2013) An approach to group decision making based on interval multiplicative and fuzzy preference relations by using projection. Appl Math Model 37(6):3929–3943

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Yue ZL (2012) Approach to group decision making based on determining the weights of experts by using projection method. Appl Math Model 36(7):2900–2910

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Yue ZL (2013) An intuitionistic fuzzy projection-based approach for partner selection. Appl Math Model 37(23):9538–9551

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Zeng SZ, Balezentis T, Chen J, Luo GF (2013) A projection method for multiple attribute group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy information. Informatica 24(3):485–503

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Ju YB, Wang AH (2013) Projection method for multiple criteria group decision making with incomplete weight information in linguistic setting. Appl Math Model 37(20):9031–9040

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Yue ZL, Jia YY (2015) A group decision making model with hybrid intuitionistic fuzzy information. Comput Ind Eng. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2015.05.016

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smarandache F (1998) Neutrosophy: neutrosophic probability, set, and logic. American Research Press, Rehoboth

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Smarandache F (2013) Introduction to neutrosophic measure, neutrosophic integral, and neutrosophic Probability. Sitech & Education Publisher, Craiova, Columbus

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Smarandache F (2014) Introduction to neutrosophic statistics. Sitech & Education Publishing, Craiova

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Smarandache F (2013) n-valued refined neutrosophic logic and its applications to physics. Prog Phys 4:143–146

    Google Scholar 

  17. Smarandache F (2015) (t, i, f)-Neutrosophic structures. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 8:3–9

    Google Scholar 

  18. Smarandache F (2015) Refined literal indeterminacy and the multiplication law of sub-indeterminacies. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 9:58–63

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ye J (2015) Multiple-attribute group decision-making method under a neutrosophic number environment. J Intell Syst. doi:10.1515/jisys-2014-0149

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kong L, Wu Y, Ye J (2015) Misfire fault diagnosis method of gasoline engines using the cosine similarity measure of neutrosophic numbers. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 8:43–46

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kaufmann A, Gupta MM (1985) Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic: theory and applications. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Ye.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ye, J. Bidirectional projection method for multiple attribute group decision making with neutrosophic numbers. Neural Comput & Applic 28, 1021–1029 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-2123-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-2123-5

Keywords

Navigation