Skip to main content
Log in

Neural network ensemble-based parameter sensitivity analysis in civil engineering systems

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of artificial neural networks for parameter sensitivity analysis in civil engineering systems is an emerging research focus of increased interest. Existing methods are generally based on a single neural network, but are inadequate as a basis for parameter sensitivity analysis because of the instability of a single neural network. To address this deficiency, this study develops a neural network ensemble-based parameter sensitivity analysis paradigm. This paradigm features use of a set of preselected superior neural networks to make decisions about parameter sensitivity by synthesizing sensitivity analysis results of individual neural networks. The proposed paradigm is employed to address two classic civil engineering problems: (1) identification of critical parameters in the fracture failure of notched concrete beams and (2) recognition of the most significant parameters in the lateral deformation of deep foundation pits. The results show that tensile strength and modulus of elasticity are the critical parameters in the fracture failure of the notched concrete beam, and elasticity modulus of soil, Poisson’s ratio and soil cohesion are the most significant influential factors in the lateral deformation of the deep foundation pit. The proposed method provides a common paradigm for analysing the sensitivity of influential parameters, shedding light on the underlying mechanisms of civil engineering systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goh AT (1994) Some civil engineering applications of neural networks. Proc ICE-Struct Build 104(4):463–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sakellariou MG, Ferentinou MD (2005) A study of slope stability prediction using neural networks. Geotech Geolog Eng 23(4):419–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Flood I, Kartam N (1994) Neural networks in civil engineering. II: systems and application. J Comput Civ Eng 8(2):149–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jeng DS, Lee TL, Lin C (2003) Application of artificial neural networks in assessment of Chi-Chi earthquake-induced liquefaction. Asian J Inf Technol 2(3):190–198

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cladera A, Mari AR (2004) Shear design procedure for reinforced normal and high-strength concrete beams using artificial neural networks. Part II: beams with stirrups. Eng Struct 26(7):927–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cao MS, Qiao PZ, Ren QW (2009) Improved hybrid wavelet neural network methodology for time-varying behavior prediction of engineering structures. Neural Comput Appl 18(7):821–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Specht DF (1991) A general regression neural network. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 2(6):568–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Olden JD, Jackson DA (2002) Illuminating the “black box”: a randomization approach for understanding variable contributions in artificial neural networks. Ecol Model 154(1):135–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Das SK, Biswal RK, Sivakugan N, Das B (2011) Classification of slopes and prediction of factor of safety using differential evolution neural networks. Environ Earth Sci 64(1):201–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hadzima-Nyarko M, Nyarko EK, Morić D (2011) A neural network based modelling and sensitivity analysis of damage ratio coefficient. Expert Syst Appl 38(10):13405–13413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jain A, Jha SK, Misra S (2008) Modeling and analysis of concrete slump using artificial neural networks. J Mater Civ Eng 20(9):628–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hao J, Wang B (2014) Parameter sensitivity analysis on deformation of composite soil-nailed wall using artificial neural networks and orthogonal experiment. Math Prob Eng. doi:10.1155/2014/502362

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sudheer KP (2005) Knowledge extraction from trained neural network river flow models. J Hydrol Eng 10(4):264–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Maier HR, Dandy GC (2000) Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: a review of modelling issues and applications. Environ Model Softw 15(1):101–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Benaouda D, Wadge G, Whitmarsh RB, Rothwell RG, MacLeod C (1999) Inferring the lithology of borehole rocks by applying neural network classifiers to downhole logs: an example from the Ocean Drilling Program. Geophys J Int 136(2):477–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Atiya A, Ji C (1997) How initial conditions affect generalization performance in large networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 8(2):448–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Thimm G, Fiesler E (1997) High-order and multilayer perceptron initialization. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 8(2):349–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sollich P, Krogh A (1996) Learning with ensembles: how over-fitting can be useful. In: Proceedings of the 1995 conference, vol 8, pp 190–196

  19. Cao M, Qiao P (2008) Neural network committee-based sensitivity analysis strategy for geotechnical engineering problems. Neural Comput Appl 17(5–6):509–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gevrey M, Dimopoulos I, Lek S (2003) Review and comparison of methods to study the contribution of variables in artificial neural network models. Ecol Model 160(3):249–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang W, Jones P, Partridge D (2000) Assessing the impact of input features in a feedforward neural network. Neural Comput Appl 9(2):101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bai R, Jia H, Cao P (2011) Factor sensitivity analysis with neural network simulation based on perturbation system. J Comput 6(7):1402–1407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Novák D, Teplý B, Shiraishi N (1993) Sensitivity analysis of structures: a review. In: Proceedings of CIVIL COMP, vol 93, pp 201–207

  24. Shahin MA, Jaksa MB, Maier HR (2009) Recent advances and future challenges for artificial neural systems in geotechnical engineering applications. Adv Artif Neural Syst. doi:10.1155/2009/308239

  25. He S, Li J (2009) Modeling nonlinear elastic behavior of reinforced soil using artificial neural networks. Appl Soft Comput 9(3):954–961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Papatheocharous E, Papadopoulos H, Andreou AS (2012) Feature subset selection for software cost modelling and estimation. arXiv preprint. arXiv:1210.1161

  27. Raghavendra BK, Srivatsa SK (2011) Evaluation of logistic regression and neural network model with sensitivity analysis on medical datasets. Int J Comput Sci Secur (IJCSS) 5(5):503–511

    Google Scholar 

  28. De Oña J, Garrido C (2014) Extracting the contribution of independent variables in neural network models: a new approach to handle instability. Neural Comput Appl 25(3–4):859–869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Aires F, Prigent C, Rossow WB (2004) Neural network uncertainty assessment using Bayesian statistics: a remote sensing application. Neural Comput 16(11):2415–2458

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Cherkassky V, Krasnopolsky V, Solomatine DP, Valdes J (2006) Computational intelligence in earth sciences and environmental applications: issues and challenges. Neural Netw 19(2):113–121

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Kingston GB, Maier HR, Lambert MF (2006) A probabilistic method for assisting knowledge extraction from artificial neural networks used for hydrological prediction. Math Comput Model 44(5):499–512

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Das SK, Basudhar PK (2006) Undrained lateral load capacity of piles in clay using artificial neural network. Comput Geotech 33(8):454–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Das SK, Basudhar PK (2008) Prediction of residual friction angle of clays using artificial neural network. Eng Geol 100(3):142–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Muduli PK, Das MR, Samui P, Kumar Das S (2013) Uplift capacity of suction caisson in clay using artificial intelligence techniques. Mar Georesour Geotechnol 31(4):375–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Dimopoulos Y, Bourret P, Lek S (1995) Use of some sensitivity criteria for choosing networks with good generalization ability. Neural Process Lett 2(6):1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Garson GD (1991) Interpreting neural-network connection weights. Artif Intell Expert 6(4):46–51

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rots J G (1988) Computational modeling of concrete fracture [D]. Technische Hogeschool Delft

  38. Carpinteri A, Ferro G (1994) Size effects on tensile fracture properties: a unified explanation based on disorder and fractality of concrete microstructure. Mater Struct 27(10):563–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Novák D, Lehký D (2006) ANN inverse analysis based on stochastic small-sample training set simulation. Eng Appl Artif Intell 19(7):731–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lehký D, Keršner Z, Novák D (2014) FraMePID-3PB software for material parameter identification using fracture tests and inverse analysis. Adv Eng Softw 72:147–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Stein M (1987) Large sample properties of simulations using Latin hypercube sampling. Technometrics 29(2):143–151

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Novák D, Vořechovský M, Teplý B (2014) FReET: software for the statistical and reliability analysis of engineering problems and FReET-D: degradation module. Adv Eng Softw 72:179–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Vořechovský M, Novák D (2009) Correlation control in small-sample Monte Carlo type simulations I: a simulated annealing approach. Probab Eng Mech 24(3):452–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Červenka V, Jendele L, Červenka J (2009) ATENA® Program Documentation, part 1: theory, Prague, Czech Republic, May

  45. Feng S, Wu Y, Li J, Li P, Zhang Z, Wang D (2012) The analysis of spatial effect of deep foundation pit in soft soil areas. Proc Earth Planet Sci 5:309–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Xu C, Ye GB (2004) Parameter sensitivity analysis of numerical model by cross test design technique. Hydrogeol Eng Geol 1:95–97

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was partially supported by the Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11132003), and the Projects (Grant No. LH14334 and Grant No. LO1408) under the National Sustainability Programme I, granted by the Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. S. Cao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cao, M.S., Pan, L.X., Gao, Y.F. et al. Neural network ensemble-based parameter sensitivity analysis in civil engineering systems. Neural Comput & Applic 28, 1583–1590 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-2132-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-2132-4

Keywords

Navigation