Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pyramidal neural networks with evolved variable receptive fields

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pyramidal neural networks (PNN) are computational systems inspired by the concept of receptive fields from the human visual system. These neural networks are designed for implicit feature extraction and have been applied in pattern recognition applications. In the original approach, the size of the receptive field within the same 2D layer is a constant parameter, while in the human visual system, the receptive field size is variable. This paper proposes a PNN with variable receptive fields determined by an evolutionary algorithm, called variable pyramidal neural network with evolutionary algorithms. We observed from experiments aiming at detecting faces in images that our approach can achieve better classification rates than the original PNN. We also observed that regions with more information (such as nose and eyes) are more emphasized by variable receptive fields. These results confirm the application of intelligent algorithms to determine adjustable receptive fields in neural networks is useful to find out relevant information for recognition task. Besides, the model is comparable to biological systems regarding the flexibility assigned to receptive fields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Adapted from Fernandes et al. [4]

Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bratton D, Kennedy J (2007) Defining a standard for particle swarm optimization. In: IEEE swarm intelligence symposium, pp 120–127

  2. Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support-vector networks. Mach Learn 20(3):273–297. doi:10.1007/BF00994018

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Deng L, Yu D (2014) Deep learning: methods and applications. Found Trends Signal Process 7(3–4):197–387. doi:10.1561/2000000039

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Fernandes BJT, Cavalcanti GDC, Ren T (2013) Lateral inhibition pyramidal neural network for image classification. IEEE Trans Cybern 43:2082–2092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ghosh K, Pal S (2010) Some insights into brightness perception of images in the light of a new computational model of figure-ground segregation. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 40(4):758–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gilbert CD, Wiesel TN (1992) Receptive field dynamics in adult primary visual cortex. Nature 356(6365):150–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Heisele B, Poggio T, Pontil M (2000) Face detection in still gray images. In: A.I. memo 1687, Center for Biological and Computational Learning

  8. Lecun Y, Bottou L, Bengio Y, Haffner P (1998) Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE, vol 86, no 11, pp 2278–2324. doi:10.1109/5.726791. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=726791

  9. Levine M, Shefner J (2000) Fundamentals of sensation and perception. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mao ZH, Massaquoi S (2007) Dynamics of winner-take-all competition in recurrent neural networks with lateral inhibition. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 18(1):55–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mitchell M (1998) An introduction to genetic algorithms. MIT Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Pettet MW, Gilbert C (1992) Dynamic changes in receptive-field size in cat primary visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89(17):8366–8370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Phung SL, Bouzerdoum A (2007) A pyramidal neural network for visual pattern recognition. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 18(2):329–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Riedmiller M, Braun H (1993) A direct adaptive method for faster backpropagation learning: the RPROP algorithm. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on neural networks, pp 586–591

  15. Rizzolati G, Camarda R (1975) Inhibition of visual responses of single units in the cat visual area of the lateral suprasylvian gyrus (clare-bishop area) by the introduction of a second visual stimulus. Brain Res 88(2):357–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Soares AM, Fernandes BJT, Bastos-Filho CJA (2014) Lateral inhibition pyramidal neural networks designed by particle swarm optimization. In: Wermter S, Weber C, Duch W, Honkela T, Koprinkova-Hristova P, Magg S, Palm G, Villa A (eds) Artificial neural networks and machine learning ICANN 2014, Lecture notes in computer science, vol 8681. Springer, pp 667–674

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially supported by Brazilian agencies Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) and Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Pernambuco (FACEPE).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno J. T. Fernandes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soares, A.M., Fernandes, B.J.T. & Bastos-Filho, C.J.A. Pyramidal neural networks with evolved variable receptive fields. Neural Comput & Applic 29, 1443–1453 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2656-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2656-2

Keywords

Navigation