Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Efficiency measurement in data envelopment analysis in the presence of ordinal and interval data

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several methods have been proposed in data envelopment analysis (DEA) for measuring efficiency in problems with interval or ordinal data. In this study, we review the weaknesses and drawbacks of these methods and show how converting ordinal or interval data into precise data can lead to violations of established DEA axioms. One of the axioms violated by these conversion processes is the inclusion of observations axiom, which requires a consistent definition of the production possibility set. We describe the special properties of ordinal and interval data together with their effect on the DEA-based rankings using a theorem and an example. We also propose a new algorithm and apply random dataset generation to overcome the problems arising from violations of the inclusion of observations axiom in DEA settings with ordinal or internal data. Several numerical examples are presented to demonstrate the applicability and exhibit the efficacy of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Asosheh A, Nalchigar S, Jamporazmey M (2010) Information technology project evaluation: an integrated data envelopment analysis and balanced scorecard approach. Expert Syst Appl 37:5931–5938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2:429–444

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen Y, Cook WD, Du J, Hu H, Zhu J (2015) Bounded and discrete data and Likert scales in data envelopment analysis: application to regional energy efficiency in China. Ann Oper Res. doi:10.1007/s10479-015-1827-3

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Cooper WW, Park KS, Yu G (1999) IDEA and AR-IDEA: models for dealing with imprecise data in DEA. Manag Sci 45:597–607

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Cooper WW, Park KS, Yu G (2001) IDEA (imprecise data envelopment analysis) with CMDs (column maximum decision making units). J Oper Res Soc 52(2):176–181

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Cooper WW, Park KS, Yu G (2001) An illustrative application of IDEA (imprecise data envelopment analysis) to a Korean mobile telecommunication company. Oper Res 49(6):807–820

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Despotis DK, Smirlis YG (2002) Data envelopment analysis with imprecise data. Eur J Oper Res 140:24–36

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Farzipoor Saen R (2007) Suppliers selection in the presence of both cardinal and ordinal data. Eur J Oper Res 183:741–747

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Kao C (2006) Interval efficiency measures in data envelopment analysis with imprecise data. Eur J Oper Res 174:1087–1099

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Kao C, Liu ST (2009) Stochastic data envelopment analysis in measuring the efficiency of Taiwan commercial banks. Eur J Oper Res 196:312–322

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Karsak EE, Dursun M (2014) An integrated supplier selection methodology incorporating QFD and DEA with imprecise data. Expert Syst Appl 41:6995–7004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Khalili-Damghani K, Tavana M, Haji-Saami S (2015) Data envelopment analysis model with interval data and undesirable output for combined cycle power plant performance assessment. Expert Syst Appl 42:760–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim SH, Park CK, Park KS (1999) An application of data envelopment analysis in telephone offices evaluation with partial data. Comput Oper Res 26:59–72

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee YK, Park KS, Kim SH (2002) Identification of inefficiencies in an additive model based IDEA (imprecise data envelopment analysis). Comput Oper Res 29:1661–1676

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Marbini AH, Emrouznejad A, Agrell PJ (2014) Interval data without sign restrictions in DEA. Appl Math Model 38:2028–2036

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Park KS (2004) Simplification of the transformations and redundancy of assurance regions in IDEA (imprecise DEA). J Oper Res Soc 55:1363–1366

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Park KS (2007) Efficiency bounds and efficiency classifications in DEA with imprecise data. J Oper Res Soc 58:533–540

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Park KS (2010) Duality, efficiency computations and interpretations in imprecise DEA. Eur J Oper Res 200:289–296

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Toloo M (2014) Selecting and full ranking suppliers with imprecise data: a new DEA method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 74:1141–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Toloo M, Nalchigar S (2011) A new DEA method for supplier selection in presence of both cardinal and ordinal data. Expert Syst Appl 38:14726–14731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang YM, Greatbanks R, Yang JB (2005) Interval efficiency assessment using data envelopment analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 153:347–370

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhu J (2003) Imprecise data envelopment analysis (IDEA): a review and improvement with an application. Eur J Oper Res 144:513–529

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhu J (2004) Imprecise DEA via standard linear DEA models with a revisit to a Korean mobile telecommunication company. Oper Res 52:323–329

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Engineering, Technology Development Institute (ACECR), Sharif University of Technology Branch, Tehran, Iran

    Bohlool Ebrahimi & Morteza Rahmani

  2. Business Systems and Analytics Department, Distinguished Chair of Business Analytics, La Salle University, Philadelphia, PA, 19141, USA

    Madjid Tavana

  3. Business Information Systems Department, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, University of Paderborn, 33098, Paderborn, Germany

    Madjid Tavana

  4. School of Economics and Management, Free University of Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy

    Francisco J. Santos-Arteaga

  5. Instituto Complutense de Estudios Internacionales, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain

    Francisco J. Santos-Arteaga

Authors
  1. Bohlool Ebrahimi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Madjid Tavana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Morteza Rahmani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Francisco J. Santos-Arteaga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Madjid Tavana.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ebrahimi, B., Tavana, M., Rahmani, M. et al. Efficiency measurement in data envelopment analysis in the presence of ordinal and interval data. Neural Comput & Applic 30, 1971–1982 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2826-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2826-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation