Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

New radial basis function network method based on decision trees to predict flow variables in a curved channel

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Open channel bends have fascinated engineers and scientists for decades while providing water for domestic, irrigation and industrial consumption. The presence of curvature in a channel impacts the flow pattern, velocity and water surface profile. Simulating flow variables such as velocity and water surface depth is one of the most important matters in the design and application of open channel bends. This study investigates a new neural network method using the radial basis function (RBF) based on decision trees (DT-RBF) to predict velocity and free-surface water profiles in a 90° open channel bend. In this study, 506 flow depth and 520 depth-averaged velocity field data obtained at 5 different discharges (5, 7.8, 13.6, 19.1 and 25.3 l/s) in a 90° sharp bend were used for training and testing purposes. The obtained results showed that the proposed DT-RBF models were more accurate than RBF models in estimating flow depth and depth-averaged velocity in the bend. The RBF root-mean-square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE) and relative error (δ) were reduced by 20, 24 and 23.5%, respectively, when using the hybrid DT-RBF model to estimate the depth-averaged velocity. For water surface prediction, the RMSE, MAE and δ decreased by 33, 27.5 and 37%, respectively, when using the proposed DT-RBF hybrid model. For the longitudinal profiles of water surface profile prediction at the outer edge, MAE (0.018) improved to MAE (0.0084) with DT-RBF. It was found that the hybrid decision tree-based method significantly improved RBF neural network performance in forecasting the velocity and free-surface water profiles in a 90° open channel sharp bend.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kimura I, Takimoto S, Blanckaert K, Shimizu Y, Hosoda T (2010) 3D RANS computations of open channel flows with a sharp bend. In: Proceedings of the 6th international symposium on environmental hydraulics, Athens, Greece, 23–25 June 2010, pp 961–966

  2. Shukry A (1950) Flow around bends in an open flume. Trans ASCE 115:751–788

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rozovskii IL (1961) Flow of water in bends of open channels. Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR, Israel Program for Science Translation, Jerusalem, pp 1–233

  4. DeVriend HJ, Geoldof HJ (1983) Main flow velocity in short river bends. J Hydraul Eng 109(7):991–1011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Steffler PM, Rajartnam N, Peterson AW (1985) Water surface change of channel curvature. J Hydraul Eng 111(5):866–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ye J, McCorquodale JA (1998) Simulation of curved open channel flows by 3D hydrodynamic model. J Hydraul Eng 124(7):687–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Blanckaert K, DeVriend HJ (2004) Secondary flow in sharp open-channel bends. J Fluid Mech 498:353–380

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Uddin MN, Rahman MM (2012) Flow and erosion at a bend in the braided Jamuna River. Int J Sediment Res 27(4):498–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Barbhuiya AK, Talukdar S (2010) Scour and three dimensional turbulent flow fields measured by ADV at a 90 degree horizontal forced bend in a rectangular channel. Flow Meas Instrum 21(3):312–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Naji MA, Ghodsian M, Vaghefi M, Panahpur N (2010) Experimental and numerical simulation of flow in a 90° bend. Flow Meas Instrum 21(3):292–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Akhtari AA, Abrishami J, Sharifi MB (2009) Experimental investigations water surface characteristics in strongly-curved open channels. J Appl Sci 9(20):3699–3706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ramamurthy AS, Han S, Biron PM (2013) Three-dimensional simulation parameters for 90° open channel bend flows. J Comput Civil Eng 27(3):282–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gholami A, Akhtari AA, Minatour Y, Bonakdari H, Javadi AA (2014) Experimental and numerical study on velocity fields and water surface profile in a strongly-curved 90° open channel bend. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech 8(3):447–461

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vaghefi M, Akbari M, Fiouz AR (2015) Experimental investigation of the three-dimensional flow velocity components in a 180 degree sharp bend. World Appl Progr 5(9):125–131

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ghobadian R, Mohammadi K (2011) Simulation of subcritical flow pattern in 180° uniform and convergent open-channel bends using SSIIM3-D model. Water Sci Eng 4(3):270–283

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vaghefi M, Ghodsian M, Neyshabouri SAAS (2012) Experimental study on scour around a T-shaped spur dike in a channel bend. J Hydraul Eng 138:471–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Han S, Ramamurthy AS, Biron PM (2011) Characteristics of flow around open channel 90° bends with vanes. J Irrig Drain Eng 137(10):668–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Han S, Biron PM, Ramamurthy AS (2011) Three-dimensional modelling of flow in sharp open-channel bends with vanes. J Hydraul Eng 49(1):64–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Beygipoor Gh, Bajestan MS, Kaskuli HA, Nazari S (2013) The effects of submerged vane angle on sediment entry to an intake from a 90 degree converged bend. Adv Environ Biol 7(9):2283–2292

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tayfur G (2002) Artificial neural network for sheet sediment transport. Hydrol Sci J 47(6):879–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kisi O (2004) River flow modeling using artificial neural networks. J Hydrol Eng 9(1):60–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Partal T, Kisi O (2007) Wavelet and neuro-fuzzy conjunction model for precipitation forecasting. J Hydrol 342(1–2):199–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zeng Y, Huai W (2009) Application of artificial neural network to predict the friction factor of open channel flow. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 14:2373–2378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ghorbani MA, Khatibi R, Aytek A, Makarynskyy O, Shiri J (2010) Sea water level forecasting using genetic programming and comparing the performance with artificial neural networks. Comput Geosci 36(5):620–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Riahi HM, Ayyoubzadeh SA, Atani MG (2011) Developing an expert system for predicting alluvial channel geometry using ANN. Expert Sys Appl 38(1):215–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Akbari M, Solaimani K, Mahdavi M, Habibnejhad M (2011) Monitoring of regional low-flow frequency using artificial neural networks. J Water Sci Res 3(1):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zaji AH, Bonakdari H (2014) Performance evaluation of two different neural network and particle swarm optimization methods for prediction of discharge capacity of modified triangular side weirs. Flow Meas Instrum 40:149–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zaji AH, Bonakdari H (2015) Application of artificial neural network and genetic programming models for estimating the longitudinal velocity field in open channel junctions. Flow Meas Instrum 41:81–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Petković D, Gocic M, Trajkovic S, Shamshirband S, Pavlović NT, Bonakdari H (2015) Determination of the most influential weather parameters on reference evapotranspiration by adaptive neuro-fuzzy methodology. Comput Electron Agric 114:277–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ebtehaj I, Bonakdari H (2015) Bed load sediment transport estimation in a clean pipe using multilayer perceptron with different training algorithms. KSCE J Civil Eng. doi:10.1007/s12205-015-0630-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tahershamsi A, Menhaj MB, Ahmadian R (2006) Sediment loads prediction using multilayer feedforward neural networks. Amirkabir J Sci Technol 16(63):103–110

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kumar B, Sreenivasulu G, Ramakrishna Rao A (2010) Radial basis function network based design of alluvial channels with seepage. J Hydrol Hydromech 58(2):102–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tahershamsi A, Majdzade Tabatabai MR, Shirkhani R (2012) An evaluation model of artificial neural network to predict stable width in gravel bed rivers. Int J Environ Sci Technol 9:333–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Senthil Kumar AR, Ojha CSP, Manish Kumar G, Singh RD, Swamee PK (2012) Modeling of suspended sediment concentration at Kasol in India using ANN, fuzzy logic, and decision tree algorithms. J Hydrol Eng 17(3):394–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bonakdari H, Baghalian S, Nazari F, Fazli M (2011) Numerical analysis and prediction of the velocity field in curved open channel using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech 5(3):384–396

    Google Scholar 

  36. Baghalian S, Bonakdari H, Nazari F, Fazli M (2012) Closed-form solution for flow field in curved channel in comparison with experimental and numerical analysis and artificial neural network. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech 6(4):514–526

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sahu M, Jana S, Agarwal S, Khatua KK (2011) Point form velocity prediction in meandering open channel using artificial neural network. In: 2nd International conference on environmental science and technology, vol 6. IACSIT Press, Singapore, pp 209–212

  38. Gholami A, Bonakdari H, Zaji AH, Akhtari AA (2015) Simulation of open channel bend characteristics using computational fluid dynamics and artificial neural networks. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech 9(1):355–369

    Google Scholar 

  39. Gholami A, Bonakdari H, Zaji AH, Akhtari AA, Khodashenas SR (2015) Predicting the velocity field in a 90° open channel bend using a gene expression programming model. Flow Meas Instrum. doi:10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2015.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Chen W, Fu ZJ, Chen CS (2014) Recent advances in radial basis function collocation methods. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. Kisi O (2008) The potential of different ANN techniques in evapotranspiration modelling. Hydrol Process 22:2449–2460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Coppersmith D, Hong SJ, Hosking JRM (1999) Partitioning nominal attributes in decision trees. Data Min Knowl Disc 3(2):197–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Razi, Kermanshah, Iran

    Azadeh Gholami, Hossein Bonakdari, Amir Hossein Zaji, Salma Ajeel Fenjan & Ali Akbar Akhtari

Authors
  1. Azadeh Gholami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hossein Bonakdari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amir Hossein Zaji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Salma Ajeel Fenjan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ali Akbar Akhtari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hossein Bonakdari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gholami, A., Bonakdari, H., Zaji, A.H. et al. New radial basis function network method based on decision trees to predict flow variables in a curved channel. Neural Comput & Applic 30, 2771–2785 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-2875-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-2875-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation