Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Filament formation in lithium niobate memristors supports neuromorphic programming capability

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Memristor crossbars are capable of implementing learning algorithms in a much more energy and area efficient manner compared to traditional systems. However, the programmable nature of memristor crossbars must first be explored on a smaller scale to see which memristor device structures are most suitable for applications in reconfigurable computing. In this paper, we demonstrate the programmability of memristor devices with filamentary switching based on LiNbO3, a new resistive switching oxide. We show that a range of resistance values can be set within these memristor devices using a pulse train for programming. We also show that a neuromorphic crossbar containing eight memristors was capable of correctly implementing an OR function. This work demonstrates that lithium niobate memristors are strong candidates for use in neuromorphic computing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Snider GS (2008) Cortical computing with memristive nanodevices, SciDAC review

  2. Jo SH, Kim K-H, Lu W (2009) High-density crossbar arrays based on a–Si memristive system. Nano Lett 9(2):870–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yakopcic C, Hasan R, Taha TM (2015) Memristor based neuromorphic circuit for ex-situ training of multi-layer neural network algorithms, IEEE IJCNN, 2015

  4. Taha TM, Hasan R, Yakopcic C (2014) Memristor crossbar based multicore neuromorphic processors, IEEE International SOCC, 2014

  5. Yakopcic C, Taha TM (2015) Determining optimal switching speed for memristors in a neuromorphic system. Electron Lett 51(21):1637–1639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Alibart F, Zamanidoost E, Strukov DB (2013) Pattern classification by memristive crossbar circuits with ex-situ and in-situ training, Nat Comm, vol 4, June 2013

  7. Yakopcic C, Taha TM, Hasan R (2014) Hybrid crossbar architecture for a memristor based memory, IEEE National Aerospace and Electronics Conference (NAECON), pp 237–242, 2014

  8. Yakopcic C, Hasan R, Taha TM (2015) Hybrid crossbar architecture for a memristor based cache. Microelectron J 46(11):1020–1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang S, Wang W, Yakopcic C, Shin E, Subramanyam G, Taha TM (2015) Lithium based memristive device, IEEE National Aerospace and Electronics Conference, 2015

  10. Li H, Xia Y, Xu B, Guo H, Yin J, Liu Z (2010) Memristive behaviors of LiNbO3 ferroelectric diodes. Appl Phys Lett 97:012902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pan X, Shuai Y, Wu C, Luo W, Sun X, Zeng H, Zhou S, Bottger R, Ou X, Mikolajick T, Zhang W, Schmidt H (2016) Rectifying filamentary resistive switching in ion-exfoliated LiNbO3 thin films. Appl Phys Lett 108:032904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu X, Biju KP, Lee J, Park J, Kim S, Park S, Shin J, Sadaf SMd, Hwang H (2011) Parallel memristive filaments model applicable to bipolar and filamentary resistive switching. Appl Phys Lett 99:113518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kozicki MN, Balakrishnan M, Gopalan C, Ratnakumar C, Mitkova M (2005) Programmable metallization cell memory based on Ag–Ge–S and Cu–Ge–S solid electrolytes, In: Proceedings of Non-Volatile Memory Technology Symposium, pp 83–89

  14. Lu W, Kim K-H, Chang T, Gaba S (2011) Two-terminal resistive switches (memristors) for memory and logic applications, In: Proceedings of the 16th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference, pp 217–223

  15. Miao F, Strachan JP, Yang JJ, Zhang M-X, Goldfarb I, Torrezan AC, Eschbach P, Kelley RD, Medeiros-Ribeiro G, Williams RS (2011) Anatomy of a nanoscale conduction channel reveals the mechanism of a high-performance memristor. Adv Mater 23(47):5633–5640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Brivio S, Covi E, Serb A, Prodromakis T, Fanciulli M, Spiga S (2016) Experimental study of gradual/abrupt dynamics of HfO2-based memristive devices. Appl Phys Lett 109:133504. doi:10.1063/1.4963675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang JJ, Sun HJ, Li Y, Wang Q, Xu XH, Miao XS (2016) AgInSbTe memristor with gradual resistance tuning. Appl Phys Lett 102:183513. doi:10.1063/1.4804983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yakopcic C, Taha TM, Subramanyam G, Pino RE (2015) Impact of memristor switching noise in a neuromorphic crossbar IEEE National Aerospace and Electronics Conference, June 2015

  19. Yakopcic C, Taha TM, Subramanyam G, Pino RE (2013) Generalized memristive device SPICE model and its application in circuit design. IEEE Trans Comput Aided Des Integr Circuits Syst 32(8):1201–1214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yakopcic C, Taha TM, Subramanyam G, Pino RE (2013) Memristor SPICE model and crossbar simulation with nanosecond switching time, IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), August 2013

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris Yakopcic.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yakopcic, C., Wang, S., Wang, W. et al. Filament formation in lithium niobate memristors supports neuromorphic programming capability. Neural Comput & Applic 30, 3773–3779 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-2958-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-2958-z

Keywords

Navigation