Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of artificial intelligence techniques for the classification of different activities of daily living and falls

  • Intelligent Biomedical Data Analysis and Processing
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Automatic detection of falls is extremely important, especially in the remote monitoring of elderly people, and will become more and more critical in the future, given the constant increase in the number of older adults. Within this framework, this paper deals with the task of evaluating several artificial intelligence techniques to automatically distinguish between different activities of daily living (ADLs) and different types of falls. To do this, UniMiB SHAR, a publicly available data set containing instances of nine different ADLs and of eight kinds of falls, is considered. We take into account five different classes of classification algorithms, namely tree-based, discriminant-based, support vector machines, K-nearest neighbors, and ensemble mechanisms, and we consider several representatives for each of these classes. These are all the classes contained in the Classification Learner app contained in MATLAB, which serves as the computational basis for our experiments. As a result, we apply 22 different classification algorithms coming from artificial intelligence under a fivefold cross-validation learning strategy, with the aim to individuate which the most suitable is for this data set. The numerical results show that the algorithm with the highest classification accuracy is the ensemble based on subspace as the ensemble method and on KNN as learner type. This shows an accuracy equal to 86.0%. Its results are better than those in the other papers in the literature that face this specific 17-class problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Altman NS (1992) An introduction to kernel and nearest-neighbor nonparametric regression. Am Stat 46(3):175–185

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45(1):5–32

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ (1984) Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole Advanced Books and Software, Donoho

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bulling A, Blanke U, Schiele B (2014) A tutorial on human activity recognition using body-worn inertial sensors. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR) 46(3):33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2006) Fatalities and injuries from falls among older adults—United States, 1993–2003 and 2001–2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wky Rep 55(45):1221–1224

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chaudhuri S, Thompson H, Demiris G (2014) Fall detection devices and their use with older adults: a systematic review. J Geriatr Phys Therapy (2001) 37(4):178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. De Falco I (2013) Differential evolution for automatic rule extraction from medical databases. Appl Soft Comput 13(2):1265–1283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. De Falco I, Della Cioppa A, Tarantino E (2006) Automatic classification of handsegmented image parts with differential evolution. In: Workshops on applications of evolutionary computation, pp 403–414. Springer

  9. Feldhorst S, Masoudenijad M, ten Hompel M, Fink GA (2016) Motion classification for analyzing the order picking process using mobile sensors. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on pattern recognition applications and methods, pp 706–713. SCITEPRESS-Science and Technology Publications, Lda

  10. Harris A, True H, Hu Z, Cho J, Fell N, Sartipi M (2016) Fall recognition using wearable technologies and machine learning algorithms. In: IEEE international conference on big data (big data), 2016, pp 3974–3976. IEEE

  11. He H, Ma Y (2013) Imbalanced learning: foundations, algorithms, and applications. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Ivascu T, Cincar K, Dinis A, Negru V (2017) Activities of daily living and falls recognition and classification from the wearable sensors data. In: E-health and bioengineering conference (EHB), 2017, pp 627–630. IEEE

  13. John G.H, Langley P (1995) Estimating continuous distributions in Bayesian classifiers. In: Proceedings of the eleventh conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence, pp 338–345

  14. Kannus P, Parkkari J, Niemi S, Palvanen M (2005) Fall-induced deaths among elderly people. Am J Public Health 95(3):422–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lara OD, Labrador MA et al (2013) A survey on human activity recognition using wearable sensors. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 15(3):1192–1209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G (2015) Deep learning. Nature 521(7553):436–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li F, Shirahama K, Nisar MA, Köping L, Grzegorzek M (2018) Comparison of feature learning methods for human activity recognition using wearable sensors. Sensors 18(2):679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu J, Sohn J, Kim S (2017) Classification of daily activities for the elderly using wearable sensors. J Healthc Eng 2017:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  19. Malhotra A, Schizas ID, Metsis V (2018) Correlation analysis-based classification of human activity time series. IEEE Sens J 18(3):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Melillo P, Castaldo R, Sannino G, Orrico A, De Pietro G, Pecchia L (2015) Wearable technology and ecg processing for fall risk assessment, prevention and detection. In: Engineering in medicine and biology society (EMBC), 2015 37th annual international conference of the IEEE, pp 7740–7743. IEEE

  21. Mellone S, Tacconi C, Schwickert L, Klenk J, Becker C, Chiari L (2012) Smartphone-based solutions for fall detection and prevention: the farseeing approach. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie 45(8):722–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Micucci D, Mobilio M, Napoletano P (2017) Unimib shar: a dataset for human activity recognition using acceleration data from smartphones. Appl Sci 7(10):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Micucci D, Mobilio M, Napoletano P, Tisato F (2017) Falls as anomalies? An experimental evaluation using smartphone accelerometer data. J Ambient Intell Hum Comput 8(1):87–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Narsky I, Porter FC (2013) Statistical analysis techniques in particle physics: fits. Density estimation and supervised learning. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Ngu AH, Tseng PT, Paliwal M, Carpenter C, Stipe W (2018) Smartwatch-based IoT fall detection application. Open J Internet Things (OJIOT) 4(1):87–98

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ordonez FJ, Englebienne G, De Toledo P, Van Kasteren T, Sanchis A, Krose B (2014) In-home activity recognition: Bayesian inference for hidden Markov models. IEEE Pervasive Comput 13(3):67–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ordóñez FJ, Roggen D (2016) Deep convolutional and lstm recurrent neural networks for multimodal wearable activity recognition. Sensors 16(1):115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Platt J (1998) Fast training of support vector machines using sequential minimal optimization. In: Schölkopf B, Burges CJC, Smola AJ (eds) Advances in Kernel methods—support vector learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 185–208

    Google Scholar 

  29. Public Health Agency of Canada (2005) Division of aging and seniors: report on seniors’ falls in Canada. Division of Aging and Seniors, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  30. Quiroz JC, Banerjee A, Dascalu SM, Lau SL (2017) Feature selection for activity recognition from smartphone accelerometer data. Intell Autom Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1080/10798587.2017.1342400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Reyes-Ortiz JL, Oneto L, Samà A, Parra X, Anguita D (2016) Transition-aware human activity recognition using smartphones. Neurocomputing 171:754–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Roggen D, Cuspinera LP, Pombo G, Ali F, Nguyen-Dinh LV (2015) Limited-memory warping lcss for real-time low-power pattern recognition in wireless nodes. In: European conference on wireless sensor networks, pp 151–167. Springer

  33. Rokach L (2010) Ensemble-based classifiers. Artif Intell Rev 33(1–2):1–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rubenstein L.Z (2006) Falls in older people: epidemiology, risk factors and strategies for prevention. Age Ageing 35(\(\text{suppl}\_2\)): ii37–ii41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986) Learning representation by back-propagation errors. Nature 323:533–536

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Saez Y, Baldominos A, Isasi P (2016) A comparison study of classifier algorithms for cross-person physical activity recognition. Sensors 17(1):66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Salguero AG, Espinilla M, Delatorre P, Medina J (2018) Using ontologies for the online recognition of activities of daily living. Sensors 18(4):1202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sannino G, De Falco I, De Pietro G (2014) Effective supervised knowledge extraction for an mhealth system for fall detection. In: XIII Mediterranean conference on medical and biological engineering and computing 2013, pp 1378–1381. Springer

  39. Sannino G, De Falco I, De Pietro G (2015) A supervised approach to automatically extract a set of rules to support fall detection in an mhealth system. Appl Soft Comput 34:205–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sannino G, De Falco I, De Pietro G (2016) Easy fall risk assessment by estimating the mini-bes test score. In: IEEE 18th international conference on e-health networking, applications and services (Healthcom), 2016, pp 1–5. IEEE

  41. Sannino G, De Falco I, De Pietro G (2017) Detection of falling events through windowing and automatic extraction of sets of rules: preliminary results. In: IEEE 14th international conference on networking, sensing and control (ICNSC), 2017, pp 661–666. IEEE

  42. Sannino G, De Falco I, De Pietro G (2017) A statistical analysis for the evaluation of the use of wearable and wireless sensors for fall risk reduction. In: HEALTHINF, pp 508–516

  43. Schmidhuber J (2015) Deep learning in neural networks: an overview. Neural Netw 61:85–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Taramasco C, Rodenas T, Martinez F, Fuentes P, Munoz R, Olivares R, Albuquerque VHC, Demongeot J (2018) A novel low-cost sensor prototype for nocturia monitoring in older people. IEEE Access 6:52500–52509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Taramasco C, Rodenas T, Martinez F, Fuentes P, Munoz R, Olivares R, De Albuquerque VHC, Demongeot J (2018) A novel monitoring system for fall detection in older people. IEEE Access 6:43563–43574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. The Mathworks, Inc. (2017) MATLAB version 9.3.0.713579 (R2017b). Natick

  47. Van Thanh P, Tran DT, Nguyen DC, Anh ND, Dinh DN, El-Rabaie S, Sandrasegaran K (2018) Development of a real-time, simple and high-accuracy fall detection system for elderly using 3-dof accelerometers. Arab J Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-018-3496-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. World Health Organization (2018) WHO global report on falls prevention in older age. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  49. Yao R, Lin G, Shi Q, Ranasinghe DC (2018) Efficient dense labelling of human activity sequences from wearables using fully convolutional networks. Pattern Recognit 78:252–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Yoo S, Oh D (2018) An artificial neural network-based fall detection. Int J Eng Bus Manag 10:1847979018787905

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ICAR, National Research Council of Italy, Via P. Castellino, 111 80131, Naples, Italy

    Ivanoe De Falco, Giuseppe De Pietro & Giovanna Sannino

Authors
  1. Ivanoe De Falco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Giuseppe De Pietro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Giovanna Sannino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivanoe De Falco.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the writing of this paper does not cause any competing interests to them.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Falco, I., De Pietro, G. & Sannino, G. Evaluation of artificial intelligence techniques for the classification of different activities of daily living and falls. Neural Comput & Applic 32, 747–758 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-03973-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-03973-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation