Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Computer-based Cobb angle measurement using deflection points in adolescence idiopathic scoliosis from radiographic images

  • S.I. : Emerging Intelligent Algorithms for Edge-of-Things Computing
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Idiopathic scoliosis treatment depends on the accurate assessment of the Cobb angle, which is usually performed manually. Manual measurements, however, can lead to observer variations, which depend on the correct selection of the curvature superior and inferior vertebrae in order to draw the needed lines for Cobb angle measurements. In this paper, we are proposing an algorithm to measure the Cobb angle semi-automatically. The algorithm is based on two processing phases in which each column in the raw X-ray image is reduced to two points representing the end points of the spine and containing its general structure and outline. These points are then used to fit a fifth-order polynomial. We hypothesize that the deflection points of the fitted curve represent the superior and inferior vertebrae of the scoliosis curvature. The deflection points were used to calculate the Cobb angle. The algorithm was tested on X-ray images from 28 subjects (14 females and 14 males, average age of 15.6 ± 1.3 years) diagnosed with adolescence idiopathic scoliosis. Three manual measurements were obtained, with manually measured Cobb angles ranging from of 10° to 98°. The mean of the standard deviation of the manual readings and the algorithm results was 5.28° and 2.64°, respectively, with mean abs error of 6.6° and R value of 0.81. Excluding the cervical and rib cage touching scoliosis cases, the mean of the standard deviation of the manual readings and the algorithm results was 4.73° and 2.35°, respectively, with mean abs error of 3.78° and R value of 0.94. From the results, we can conclude that our proposed algorithm can minimize and simplify user intervention, thus allowing easier and more accurate Cobb angles measurements and resulting in a shorter diagnosis time and requiring no special skills from the user.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Negrini S et al (2012) 2011 SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis 7(1):1–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Clark EM et al (2014) Association between components of body composition and scoliosis: a prospective cohort study reporting differences identifiable before the onset of scoliosis. J Bone Miner Res 29(8):1729–1736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sardjono TA et al (2013) Automatic Cobb angle determination from radiographic images. Spine 38(20):E1256–E1262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kundu R, Chakrabarti A, Lenka PK (2012) Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis with reduced variability. arXiv preprint arXiv:1211.5355

  5. Krishnan SP (2013) Scoliosis. In: Mohan Iyer K (ed) Trauma management in orthopedics. Springer, Berlin, pp 213–228

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Hresko MT (2013) Idiopathic Scoliosis in adolescents. N Engl J Med 368(9):834–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Illés T, Somoskeöy S (2013) Comparison of scoliosis measurements based on three-dimensional vertebra vectors and conventional two-dimensional measurements: advantages in evaluation of prognosis and surgical results. Eur Spine J 22(6):1255–1263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Abuzaghleh T, Barkana B (2012) Computer-aided technique for the measurement of the Cobb angle. In: Proceedings of the international conference on image processing, computer vision, and pattern recognition (IPCV). The Steering Committee of the World Congress in computer science, computer engineering and applied computing (WorldComp)

  9. Konieczny MR, Senyurt H, Krauspe R (2013) Epidemiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Child Orthop 7(1):3–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Allen S et al (2008) Validity and reliability of active shape models for the estimation of Cobb angle in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Digit Imaging 21(2):208–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Weiss H-R et al (2006) Indications for conservative management of scoliosis (guidelines). Scoliosis 1(1):1–5

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Helenius I et al (2005) Does gender affect outcome of surgery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Spine 30(4):462–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Caronni A, Zaina F, Negrini S (2014) Improving the measurement of health-related quality of life in adolescent with idiopathic scoliosis: the SRS-7, a Rasch-developed short form of the SRS-22 questionnaire. Res Dev Disabil 35(4):784–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Goldberg CJ et al (2008) Scoliosis: a review. Pediatr Surg Int 24(2):129–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang J-Y, Kao P-F, Chen Y-S (2007) Automatic Cobb angle measurement system by using nuclear medicine whole body bone scan. In: MVA

  16. Phan P et al (2011) Computer algorithms and applications used to assist the evaluation and treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a review of published articles 2000–2009. Eur Spine J 20(7):1058–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shea KG et al (1998) A comparison of manual versus computer-assisted radiographic measurement. Intraobserver measurement variability for Cobb angles. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23(5):551–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stokes IA, Aronsson DD (2006) Computer-assisted algorithms improve reliability of King classification and Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis. Spine 31(6):665–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shea KG et al (1998) A comparison of manual versus computer-assisted radiographic measurement—intraobserver measurement variability for Cobb angles. Spine 23(5):551–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Illés T, Tunyogi-Csapó M, Somoskeöy S (2011) Breakthrough in three-dimensional scoliosis diagnosis: significance of horizontal plane view and vertebra vectors. Eur Spine J 20(1):135–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Langensiepen S et al (2013) Measuring procedures to determine the Cobb angle in idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 22(11):2360–2371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bland JM, Altmanab DG (2010) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Int J Nurs Stud 47(8):931–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu W et al (2014) Reliability and reproducibility analysis of the Cobb angle and assessing sagittal plane by computer-assisted and manual measurement tools. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 15:33

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biomedical Engineering Department, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P. O. Box 3030, Irbid, 22110, Jordan

    Areen K. Al-Bashir, Hala K. Amari, Enas W. Abdulhay & Rabah M. Al Abdi

  2. Biomedical Engineering Department, the Hashemite University, Zarqa, 13133, Jordan

    Mohammad A. Al-Abed

  3. Orthopedic Department, Jordanian Royal Medical Services, Amman, 11855, Jordan

    Fadi M. Al-Rousan & Omar M. K. Bashmaf

  4. Department of Electronics and Instrumentation, Sastra University, Thajavur, India

    N. Arunkumar

  5. Faculty of Electronics and Communication Engineering, S.A. Engineering College, Chennai, India

    B. R. Tapas Bapu

  6. Radiation Oncology Department, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, 30912, USA

    Ahmad K. Al-Basheer

Authors
  1. Areen K. Al-Bashir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohammad A. Al-Abed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hala K. Amari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fadi M. Al-Rousan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Omar M. K. Bashmaf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Enas W. Abdulhay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Rabah M. Al Abdi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. N. Arunkumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. B. R. Tapas Bapu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Ahmad K. Al-Basheer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Areen K. Al-Bashir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Bashir, A.K., Al-Abed, M.A., Amari, H.K. et al. Computer-based Cobb angle measurement using deflection points in adolescence idiopathic scoliosis from radiographic images. Neural Comput & Applic 31, 1547–1561 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3614-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3614-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation