Skip to main content
Log in

Research on data fusion of multi-sensors based on fuzzy preference relations

  • Machine Learning Applications for Self-Organized Wireless Networks
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For the data fusion of multi-sensors, the determination of weight directly affects the accuracy and performance of the fusion algorithm. In order to improve the accuracy of fusion algorithm, an adaptive weighted algorithm based on fuzzy preference relations is proposed. The degree of preference between signals is represented by introducing the improved logsig function, and then, the weight is calculated by fuzzy preference relations. Simulation results show that the proposed algorithm is significantly better than the mean value method, and the accuracy is basically equivalent to the method based on correlation function. The analysis of the actual vibration signals in axis system verifies the validity of the algorithm in the practical application. The algorithm in this paper has good dynamic performance and is easy to be implemented. It can be applied to the actual multi-vibration signal estimation to provide more accurate parameters for the next step of fault diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yunusa-Kaltungo A, Sinha JK, Elbhbah K (2014) An improved data fusion technique for faults diagnosis in rotating machines. Measurement 58:27–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chuan LI, Rongrong ZHU, Shuai YANG (2015) Optimal frequency band demodulation for fault diagnosis of rolling element bearings based on fuzzy fusion of multiple criteria. J Mech Eng 51(7):107–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Safizadeh MS, Latifi SK (2014) Using multi-sensor data fusion for vibration fault diagnosis of rolling element bearings by accelerometer and load cell. Inf Fusion 18:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Banerjee TP, Das S (2012) Multi-sensor data fusion using support vector machine for motor fault detection. Inf Sci 217:96–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Duro JA, Padget JA, Bowen CR et al (2016) Multi-sensor data fusion framework for CNC machining monitoring. Mech Syst Signal Process 66:505–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sun G, Lei G, Wang L et al (2016) Method for fault diagnosis based on multi-sensor information fusion. J Shanghai Inst Technol (Nat Sci) 16(1):22–25

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ding H, Zhong Y, Zhang J et al (2016) Multi-sensor adaptive weighted fusion algorithm based on correlation function. J Chongqing Univ Technol (Nat Sci) 30(2):114–118

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hafezalkotob A, Hafezalkotob A (2016) Fuzzy entropy-weighted MULTIMOORA method for materials selection. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 31(3):1211–1226

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Safari S, Shabani F, Simon D (2014) Multirate multisensor data fusion for linear systems using Kalman filters and a neural network. Aerosp Sci Technol 39:465–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Castanedo F (2013) A review of data fusion techniques. Sci World J 2013(2):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhai Y, Dai Y (1998) Study of adaptive weighted fusion estimated algorithm of multisensor data. Acta Metrol Sin 19(1):69–75

    Google Scholar 

  12. Huadong WANG, Dayu WANG (2015) An improved multiple wireless sensor data batch estimation adaptive weighted fusion algorithm. Chin J Sens Actuators 28(8):1239–1243

    Google Scholar 

  13. Khayet M, Cojocaru C (2013) Artificial neural network model for desalination by sweeping gas membrane distillation. Desalination 308:102–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuo RJ, Wang YC, Tien FC (2010) Integration of artificial neural network and MADA methods for green supplier selection. J Clean Prod 18(12):1161–1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yi H, Xiusheng D, Shiyu S et al (2017) A study of training algorithm in deep neural networks based on sigmoid activation function. Comput Meas Control 25(2):126–129

    Google Scholar 

  16. Qinghua H, Pan W, Zhang D et al (2012) Feature selection for monotonic classification. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 20(1):69–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Qinghua H, Daren Yu, Guo M (2010) Fuzzy preference based rough sets. Inf Sci 180(10):2003–2022

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National key R & D plan (Grant: 2017YFD0710201 and 2016YFD0702103), Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant: 2017GGX30105, 2018CXGC0601 and 2017CXGC0903), Innovation plan of agricultural machinery and equipment in Shandong province (Grant: 2018YZ002 and 2017YF006-02).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yongwei Tang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hao, H., Wang, M., Tang, Y. et al. Research on data fusion of multi-sensors based on fuzzy preference relations. Neural Comput & Applic 31 (Suppl 1), 337–346 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3778-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3778-5

Keywords

Navigation