Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Adaptive neurofuzzy H-infinity control of DC–DC voltage converters

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A novel adaptive neurofuzzy H-infinity control approach to feedback control of DC–DC converters, being used in applications of renewable energy generation, is developed. The form and the parameters of the differential equations that constitute the dynamic model of the controlled system are considered to be unknown, while there is only knowledge about the order of the system. The model of the controlled system undergoes approximate linearization around a temporary operating point which is re-computed at each iteration of the control algorithm. The linearization procedure makes use of Taylor series expansion and the computation of Jacobian matrices. For the approximately linearized model of the DC–DC converter, it is possible to design a stabilizing H-infinity feedback controller, provided that knowledge about the matrices of the linearized state-space description is available. In such a case, the computation of the feedback controller’s gain comes from the solution of an algebraic Riccati equation taking also place at each iteration of the control method. However, since the elements of these matrices are unknown, it is proposed to estimate them with the use of neurofuzzy approximators. Actually, neurofuzzy networks are employed for learning the constituent functions of the system’s dynamic model. Based on these function estimates, the system’s Jacobian matrices are also obtained and this allows the implementation of the H-infinity feedback controller. To assure the stability of the control loop, the learning rate of the neurofuzzy approximators is chosen from the requirement that the first derivative of the system’s Lyapunov function to be always a negative one. The global asymptotic stability and the robustness properties of the control method are proven through Lyapunov stability analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gopal C, Mohanraj M, Chandramohan P, Chandrasekar P (2013) Renewable energy source water pumping systems—a literature review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 25:351–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lopez-Luque R, Reca J, Martinez J (2015) Optimal design of a standalone direct pumping photovoltaic system for deficit irrigation of olive orchards. Appl Energy 149:13–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Theunisse TAF, Chai J, Sanfelice RG, Heemels WPMH (2015) Robust global stabilization of the DC–DC boost converter via hybrid control. IEEE Trans Circ Syst I Regul Pap 62(4):1052–1061

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Ouachani I, Rabhi A, Tidhaf B, Zouggar S, Elhajjaji A (2013) Optimization and control for a photovoltaic pumping system. In: 2013 International conference on renewable energy research and applications, Madrid, Spain

  5. Mazumder SK, Nayfeh AH, Borojevic D (2002) Robust control of parallel DC–DC buck converters by combining integral-variable-structure and multiple-sliding-surface control schemes. IEEE Trans Power Electron 17(3):428–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fadil HE, Giri F, Haloua M, Ouadi H (2003) Nonlinear and adaptive control of buck power converters. In: Proceedings of the 42nd IEEE conference on decision and control. Maui, Hawaii USA

  7. Zurita-Bustamante EW, Linares-Flores J, Guzman-Ramirez E, Sira-Ramirez H (2011) A comparison between the GPI and PID controllersfor the stabilization of a DC–DC buck converter: a field programmable gate array implementation. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 58(11):5251–5263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. An L, Dah-Chuan Lu D (2015) Design of a single-switch DC/DC converter for a PV-battery-powered pump system with PFM+PWM control. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 62(2):910–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Andoulssi R, Draou A, Jerbi H, Alghonamy A, Khiari B (2013) Nonlinear control of a photovoltaic water pumping System. Energy Procedia 42:328–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Angulo-Nunez MI, Sira-Ramirez H (1998) Flatness in the passivity based control of DC-to-DC power converters. In: Proceedings of the 37th IEEE conference on decision and control, Tampa, Florida, USA

  11. Linares-Flores J, Sira-Ramirez H (2004) DC motor velocity control through a DC-to-DC power converter. In: 43rd IEEE conference on decision and control, Bahamas

  12. Linares-Flores J, Mendez A Hernadez, Garcia-Rodriguez C, Sira-Ramirez H (2014) Robust nonlinear adaptive control of a “boost” converter via algebraic parameter identification. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 61(8):4105–4114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sira-Ramirez H (1999) Flatness and trajectory tracking in sliding mode based regulation of dc-to-ac conversion schemes. In: Proceedings of the 38th conference on decision and control phoenix, Arizona, USA

  14. Silva-Ortigoza R, Hernandez-Guzman VM, Antonio-Cruz M, Munoz-Carrillo D (2015) DC–DC Buck power converter as a smooth starter for a DC motor based on a hierarchical control. IEEE Trans Power Electron 30(2):1076–1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Thounthong P, Pierfederici S (2010) A new control law based on the differential flatness principle for multiphase interleaved DC–DC converter. IEEE Trans Circ Syst II Express Briefs 57(11):903–907

    Google Scholar 

  16. Antritter F, Maurer P, Reger J (2006) Flatness-based control of a buck-converter driven DC motor. In: Proceedings 4th IFAC symposium on mechatronic systems 2006. Heidelberg, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  17. Qin Y, Peng H, Zhou F, Zeng X, Wu J (2015) Nonlinear modeling and control approach to magnetic levitation ball system using functional weight RBF network-based state-dependent ARX model. J Frankl Inst 352:4309–4338

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhao J (2016) NN-adaptive predictive control for a class of discrete-time nonlinear systems with input-delay. Neurocomputing 173:1832–1838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yue H, Li J (2012) Output-feedback adaptive fuzzy control for a class of nonlinear time-varying delay systems with unknown control directions. IET Control Theory Appl 6:1266–1280

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Cho YW, Park CW, kim JH, Park M (2005) Indirect model reference adaptive fuzzy control of dynamic fuzzy-state space model. IET Proc Control Theory Appl 148(4):273–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Huang YS, Zhou DQ, Xiao SP, Ling D (2009) Coordinated deventralized hybrid adaptive output feedback fuzzy control for a class of large-scale nonlinear systems with strong interconnections. IET Control Theory and Appl 3(9):1261–1274

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Horng JH (1999) Neural adaptive tracking control of a DC motor. Inf Sci 118:1–13

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Ge SS, Wang C (2002) Direct adaptive NN control of a class of nonlinear systems. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 13(1):214–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang LX (1998) A course in fuzzy systems and control. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tong S, Li H-X, Chen G (2004) Adaptive fuzzy decentralized control for a class of large-scale nonlinear systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B Cybern 34(1):770–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Li HX, Tong S (2003) A hybrid adaptive fuzzy control for a class of nonlinear MIMO systems. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 11(1):24–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Song T, Bin C, Wang Y (2005) Fuzzy adaptive output feedback control for MIMO nonlinear systems. Fuzzy Sets Syst 156:285–299

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen CS (2009) Dynamic structure adaptive neural fuzzy control for MIMO uncertain nonlinear systems. Inf Sci 179:2676–2688

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Tong S, Li Y (2009) Observer-based adaptive control for strict-feedback nonlinear systems. Fuzzy Sets Syst 160:1749–1764

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen CH, Lin CM, Chen TY (2008) Intelligent adaptive control for MIMO uncertain nonlinear systems. Expert Syst Appl 35:865–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lévine J (2011) On necessary and sufficient conditions for differential flatness. Appl Algebra Eng Commun Comput 22(1):47–90

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Rudolph J (2003) Flatness based control of distributed parameter systems, examples and computer exercises from various technological domains. Shaker Verlag, Aachen

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sira-Ramirez H, Agrawal S (2004) Differentially flat systems. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Rigatos GG (2011) Modelling and control for intelligent industrial systems: adaptive algorithms in robotics and industrial engineering. Springer, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Rigatos G (2013) Advanced models of neural networks: nonlinear dynamics and stochasticity in biological neurons. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Rigatos G (2015) Nonlinear control and filtering using differential flatness approaches: applications to electromechanical systems. Springer, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Rigatos G (2016) Intelligent renewable energy systems: modelling and control. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  38. Rigatos G (2017) State-space approaches for modelling and control in financial engineering: systems theory and machine learning methods. Springer, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Rigatos G, Siano P (2014) An H-infinity feedback control approach to autonomous robot navigation. In: IEEE IECON 2014. Dallas, Texas

  40. Rigatos G, Siano P (2015) A New Nonlinear H-infinity Feedback Control Approach to the Problem of Autonomous Robot Navigation. Journal of Intelligent Industrial Systems, Springer 1(3):179–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Rigatos G, Siano P, Wira P, Profumo F (2015) Nonlinear H-infinity feedback control for asynchronous motors of electric trains. J Intell Ind Syst 1(3):85–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Rigatos GG, Tzafestas SG (2007) Extended Kalman filtering for fuzzy modelling and multi-sensor fusion. Math Comput Model Dyn Syst 13:251–266

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Rigatos G, Zhang Q (2009) Fuzzy model validation using the local statistical approach. Fuzzy Sets Syst 60(7):882–904

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Basseville M, Nikiforov I (1993) Detection of abrupt changes: theory and applications. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Kurylowicz A, Jaworska I, Tzafestas SG (1993) Robust stabilizing control: an overview. In: Tzafestas SG (ed) Applied control: current trends and modern methodologies. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 289–324

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lublin L, Athans M (1995) An experimental comparison of and designs for interferometer testbed. In: Francis B, Tannenbaum A (eds) Lectures notes in control and information sciences: feedback control, nonlinear systems and complexity. Springer, Berlin, pp 150–172

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Doyle JC, Glover K, Khargonekar PP, Francis BA (1989) State-space solutions to standard \(H_2\) and \(H_{\infty }\) control problems. IEEE Trans Autom Control 34:831–847

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhang WJ, van Lutterwelt CA (2011) Towards a resilient manufacturing system. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 60:469–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Ouyang PR, Zhang WJ, Gupta MM (2016) An adaptive switching learning control method for trajectory tracking of robotic manipulators. Mechatronics 16:51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Gardezi MSH, Hasan A (2018) Machine learning based adaptive predictive horizon in finite control set model predictive control. IEEE Access 6:32392–32400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Nizam TK, Chakravarty A, Mahanta C (2017) Design and implementation of a neuro=adaptive backstepping controller for buck converter fed PMDC-motor. Control Eng Pract 58:78–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Sharifian A, Sansansara SF, Ghadi MJ, Ghadival S, Li L, Zhang J (2018) Dynamic performance improvement of an ultra-lift Luo DC-DC converter by using a type-2 fuzzy neural network. Comput Electr Eng 63:171–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding was provided by Unit of Industrial Automation/Industrial Systems Institute (Grant No. Ref 5585/Intelligent Renewable Energy Systems).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Rigatos.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

To the authors’ knowledge, there is no known conflict of interest about this research work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rigatos, G., Siano, P. & Sayed-Mouchaweh, M. Adaptive neurofuzzy H-infinity control of DC–DC voltage converters. Neural Comput & Applic 32, 2507–2520 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04394-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04394-4

Keywords

Navigation