Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Derivation of personalized numerical scales from distribution linguistic preference relations: an expected consistency-based goal programming approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to the promising performance of distribution linguistic preference relations (DLPRs) in eliciting the comparison information coming from decision makers (DMs), linguistic decision problems of this type of preference relations have attracted considerable research interest in recent years. However, to our best knowledge, there is little research on the personalized individual semantics of linguistic terms when dealing with computing with words (CWW) in the process of solving linguistic decision problems with DLPRs. As is well known, one statement about CWW in linguistic decisions is that words might exhibit different meanings for different people. Words need to be individually quantified when dealing with CWW. Hence, the objective of this study is to fill this gap by applying the idea of personalizing numerical scales of linguistic terms for different DMs in linguistic decision with DLPRs to manage the statement about CWW. First, this study connects DLPRs to fuzzy preference relations and multiplicative preference relations by using different types of numerical scales. Then, definitions of expected consistency for DLPRs are presented. On the basis of expected consistency, some goal programming models are built to derive personalized numerical scales for linguistic terms from DLPRs. Finally, a numerical study concerning football player evaluation is analyzed by using the proposed method to demonstrate its applicability in practical decision scenarios. A discussion and a comparative study highlight the validity of the proposed method in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alonso S, Cabrerizo FJ, Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (2009) Group decision making with incomplete fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Int J Intell Syst 24:201–222

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Dong YC, Xu YF, Li HY, Dai M (2008) A comparative study of the numerical scales and the prioritization methods in AHP. Eur J Oper Res 186:229–242

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Dong YC, Xu YF, Yu S (2009) Linguistic multiperson decision making based on the use of multiple preference relations. Fuzzy Set Syst 160:603–623

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Dong YC, Xu YF, Yu S (2009) Computing the numerical scale of the linguistic term set for the 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 17:1366–1378

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dong YC, Zhang GQ, Hong WC, Yu S (2013) Linguistic computational model based on 2-tuples and intervals. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 21:1006–1018

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dong YC, Herrera-Viedma E (2015) Consistency-driven automatic methodology to set interval numerical scales of 2-tuple linguistic term sets and its use in the linguistic GDM with preference relation. IEEE Trans Cybern 45:780–792

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dong YC, Wu YZ, Zhang HJ, Zhang GG (2015) Multi-granular unbalanced linguistic distribution assessments with interval symbolic proportions. Knowl Based Syst 82:139–151

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dong YC, Li CC, Herrera F (2016) Connecting the linguistic hierarchy and the numerical scale for the 2-tuple linguistic model and its use to deal with hesitant unbalanced linguistic information. Inf Sci 367:259–278

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dutta B, Guha D, Mesiar R (2015) A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with heterogeneous relationship among attributes in multi-expert decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 23:1817–1831

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gao J, Xu ZS, Ren PJ, Liao HC (2018) An emergency decision making method based on the multiplicative consistency of probabilistic linguistic preference relations. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 10:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ghadikolaei AS, Madhoushi M, Divsalar M (2018) Extension of the VIKOR method for group decision making with extended hesitant fuzzy linguistic information. Neural Comput Appl 30:3589–3602

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gou XJ, Xu ZS, Herrera F (2018) Consensus reaching process for large-scale group decision making with double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Knowl Based Syst 157:20–33

    Google Scholar 

  13. Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F, Chiclana F, Luque M (2004) Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 154:98–109

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Herrera-Viedma E, Martinez L, Mata F, Chiclana F (2005) A consensus support system model for group decision-making problems with multigranular linguistic preference relations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 13:644–658

    Google Scholar 

  15. Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay JL (1996) A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments. Fuzzy Set Syst 78:73–87

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Martinez L (2000) A fusion approach for managing multi-granularity linguistic term sets in decision making. Fuzzy Set Syst 114:43–58

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Chiclana F (2001) Multiperson decision-making based on multiplicative preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 129:372–385

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Herrera F, Martinez L (2001) A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with multigranular hierarchical linguistic contexts in multi-expert decision-making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern 31:227–234

    Google Scholar 

  19. Herrera F, Alonso S, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2009) Computing with words in decision making: foundations, trends and prospects. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 8:337–364

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Krishankumar R, Ravichandran KS, Ahmed MI, Kar S, Tyagi SK (2019) Probabilistic linguistic preference relation-based decision framework for multi-attribute group decision making. Symmetry 11:2

    Google Scholar 

  21. Li CC, Dong YC, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Martinez L (2017) Personalized individual semantics in computing with words for supporting linguistic group decision making. An application on consensus reaching. Inf Fusion 33:29–40

    Google Scholar 

  22. Li CC, Rodríguez RM, Herrera F, Martinez L, Dong YC (2017) A consistency-driven approach to set personalized numerical scales for hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. In: IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems (FUZZ-IEEE), Naples, Italy. IEEE, pp 1–5

  23. Li CC, Rodriguez RM, Martinez L, Dong YC, Herrera F (2018) Personalized individual semantics based on consistency in hesitant linguistic group decision making with comparative linguistic expressions. Knowl Based Syst 145:156–165

    Google Scholar 

  24. Liu HB, Ma Y, Jiang L (2019) Managing incomplete preferences and consistency improvement in hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations with applications in group decision making. Inf Fusion 51:19–29

    Google Scholar 

  25. Martinez L, Herrera F (2012) An overview on the 2-tuple linguistic model for computing with words in decision making: extensions, applications and challenges. Inf Sci 207:1–18

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Massanet S, Riera JV, Torrens J, Herrera-Viedma E (2016) A model based on subjective linguistic preference relations for group decision making problems. Inf Sci 355:249–264

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mendel JM, Wu D (2010) Perceptual computing: aiding people in making subjective judgments. IEEE Press and John Wiley, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mendel JM, Zadeh LA, Trillas E, Yager R, Lawry J, Hagras H, Guadarrama S (2010) What computing with words means to me. IEEE Comput Intell Mag 5:20–26

    Google Scholar 

  29. Morente-Molinera JA, Perez IJ, Urena MR, Herrera-Viedma E (2015) On multi-granular fuzzy linguistic modeling in group decision making problems: a systematic review and future trends. Knowl Based Syst 74:49–60

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ölçer Aİ, Odabaşi AY (2005) A new fuzzy multiple attributive group decision making methodology and its application to propulsion/manoeuvring system selection problem. Eur J Oper Res 166:93–114

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Pang Q, Wang H, Xu ZS (2016) Probabilistic linguistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making. Inf Sci 369:128–143

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rodriguez RM, Martinez L, Herrera F (2013) A group decision making model dealing with comparative linguistic expressions based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Inf Sci 241:28–42

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Salo AA, Hämäläinen RP (1997) On the measurement of preferences in the analytic hierarchy process. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 6:309–319

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Tanino T (1984) Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision-making. Fuzzy Set Syst 12:117–131

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang JH, Hao JY (2006) A new version of 2-tuple. Fuzzy linguistic, representation model for computing with words. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 14:435–445

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wang JH, Hao J (2007) An approach to computing with words based on canonical characteristic values of linguistic labels. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 15:593–604

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wu YZ, Li CC, Chen X, Dong YC (2018) Group decision making based on linguistic distributions and hesitant assessments: maximizing the support degree with an accuracy constraint. Inf Fusion 41:151–160

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wu ZB, Xu JP (2016) Managing consistency and consensus in group decision making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Omega Int J Manag S 65:28–40

    Google Scholar 

  40. Xu JP, Wu ZB (2013) A maximizing consensus approach for alternative selection based on uncertain linguistic preference relations. Comput Ind Eng 64:999–1008

    Google Scholar 

  41. Xu ZS (1999) Study on the relation between two classes of scales in AHP. Syst Eng Theory Pract 19:311–314

    Google Scholar 

  42. Xu ZS (2004) EOWA and EOWG operators for aggregating linguistic labels based on linguistic preference relations. Int J Uncertain Fuzz 12:791–810

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Xu ZS (2007) A survey of preference relations. Int J Gen Syst 36:179–203

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Xu ZS (2008) Group decision making based on multiple types of linguistic preference relations. Inf Sci 178:452–467

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. 1. Inf Sci 8:199–249

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhang BW, Liang HM, Gao Y, Zhang GQ (2018) The optimization-based aggregation and consensus with minimum-cost in group decision making under incomplete linguistic distribution context. Knowl Based Syst 162:92–102

    Google Scholar 

  47. Zhang GQ, Dong YC, Xu YF (2014) Consistency and consensus measures for linguistic preference relations based on distribution assessments. Inf Fusion 17:46–55

    Google Scholar 

  48. Zhang YX, Xu ZS, Wang H, Liao HC (2016) Consistency-based risk assessment with probabilistic linguistic preference relation. Appl Soft Comput 49:817–833

    Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang YX, Xu ZS, Liao HC (2017) A consensus process for group decision making with probabilistic linguistic preference relations. Inf Sci 414:260–275

    Google Scholar 

  50. Zhang YX, Xu ZS, Liao HC (2018) An ordinal consistency-based group decision making process with probabilistic linguistic preference relation. Inf Sci 467:179–198

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhang Z, Guo CH, Martinez L (2017) Managing multigranular linguistic distribution assessments in large-scale multiattribute group decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 47:3063–3076

    Google Scholar 

  52. Zhang ZM, Wu C (2014) On the use of multiplicative consistency in hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Knowl Based Syst 72:13–27

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the State Scholarship Fund of China (No. 201706690025), the Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71521001) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 71690230, 71690235, 71501056, 71601066, 71501055, 71501054 and 71571166).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, Box 270, Hefei, 230009, Anhui, People’s Republic of China

    Xiaoan Tang, Qiang Zhang, Zhanglin Peng & Shanlin Yang

  2. Key Laboratory of Process Optimization and Intelligent Decision-making, Ministry of Education, Hefei, Box 270, Hefei, 230009, Anhui, People’s Republic of China

    Xiaoan Tang, Qiang Zhang, Zhanglin Peng & Shanlin Yang

  3. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6R 2V4, Canada

    Xiaoan Tang & Witold Pedrycz

  4. Systems Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland

    Witold Pedrycz

Authors
  1. Xiaoan Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qiang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhanglin Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shanlin Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Witold Pedrycz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoan Tang.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tang, X., Zhang, Q., Peng, Z. et al. Derivation of personalized numerical scales from distribution linguistic preference relations: an expected consistency-based goal programming approach. Neural Comput & Applic 31, 8769–8786 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04466-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04466-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation