Skip to main content
Log in

An unmanned aerial vehicle-aided node localization using an efficient multilayer perceptron neural network in wireless sensor networks

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Localization of sensor node is decisive for many localization-based scenarios of wireless sensor networks (WSNs). Node localization using fixed terrestrial anchor nodes (ANs) equipped with global positioning system (GPS) modules suffers from high deployment cost and poor localization accuracy, because the terrestrial AN propagates signals to the unknown nodes (UNs) through unreliable ground-to-ground channel. However, the ANs deployed in unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) with a single GPS module communicate over reliable air-to-ground channel, where almost clear line-of-sight path exists. Thus, the localization accuracy and deployment cost are better with aerial anchors than terrestrial anchors. However, still the nonlinear distortions imposed in propagation channel limit the performance of classical RSSI and least square localization schemes. So, the neural network (NN) models can become good alternative for node localization under such nonlinear conditions as they can do complex nonlinear mapping between input and output. Since the multilayer perceptron (MLP) is a robust tool in the assembly of NNs, MLP-based localization scheme is proposed for UN localization in UAV-aided WSNs. The detailed simulation analysis provided in this paper prefers the MLP localization scheme as they exhibit improved localization accuracy and deployment cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harl H, Willig A (2005) Protocols and architectures for wireless sensor networks. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chizari H, Poston T, Abd Razak S, Abdullah AH, Salleh S (2014) Local coverage measurement algorithm in GPS-free wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Net 23:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wen F, Liang C (2015) Fine-grained indoor localization using single access point with multiple antennas. IEEE Sens J 15:1538–1544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tarrío P, Bernardos AM, Casar JR (2012) An energy-efficient strategy for accurate distance estimation in wireless sensor networks. Sensors 12:15438–15466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xiong H, Chen Z, Yang B, Ni R (2015) TDoA localization algorithm with compensation of clock offset for wireless sensor networks. China Commun 12:193–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu Y, Hu YH, Pan Q (2012) Distributed, robust acoustic source localization in a wireless sensor network. IEEE Trans Signal Process 60:4350–4359

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Maddumabandara A, Leung H, Liu M (2015) Experimental evaluation of indoor localization using wireless sensor networks. IEEE Sens J 15:5228–5237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Xu Y, Zhou J, Zhang P (2014) RSS-based source localization when path-loss model parameters are unknown. IEEE Commun Lett 18:1055–1058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Aspnes J, Eren T, Goldenberg DK et al (2006) A theory of network localization. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 5:1663–1678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bulusu N, Heidemann J, Estrin D (2000) GPS-less low-cost outdoor localization for very small devices. IEEE Pers Commun 7:28–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Niculescu D, Nath B (2003) DV based positioning in Ad Hoc networks. Telecomm Syst 22:267–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu Y (2011) An adaptive multi-hop distance localization algorithm in WSN. Manuf Automob 33:161–163

    Google Scholar 

  13. Das ADR, Mallick DK (2017) A congestion aware, energy efficient, on demand fuzzy logic based clustering protocol for multi-hop wireless sensor networks. Wirel Pers Commun 97:1445–1474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. López DA, Rojas CA, Zapata DF et al (2018) Designing a MAC algorithm for equitable spectrum allocation in cognitive radio wireless networks. Wirel Pers Commun 98:363–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cheng BH, Vandenberghe L, Yao K (2009) Distributed algorithm for node localization in wireless ad-hoc networks. ACM Trans Sens Netw 6:8–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Storn R, Price KV (1997) Differential evolution—a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J Glob Optim 11:341–359

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Harikrishnan R, Jawahar Senthil Kumar V, Sridevi Ponmalar P (2016) A comparative analysis of intelligent algorithms for localization in wireless sensor networks. Wirel Pers Commun 87:1057–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Annepu V, Rajesh A (2017) An efficient differential evalutionary algorithm based localization in wireless sensor networks. Int Conf Microelectron Dev Circ Syst. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMDCS.2017.8211560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Weatherington D (2002) Unmanned aerial vehicles roadmap: 2002–2027. Technical report ADA414908. Office of Secretary of Defence, Washington, DC, USA

  20. Xu Y, Zhenguo G, Qiang N (2017) Unmanned aerial vehicle–assisted node localization for wireless sensor Networks. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 13:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hazem S, Mohammad MA, Alessandro C, Sofie P (2018) Aerial anchors positioning for reliable RSS-based outdoor localization in urban environments. IEEE Wirel Commun Lett 7:376–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Morbidi F, Mariottini GL (2013) Active target tracking and cooperative localization for teams of aerial vehicles. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 21:1694–1707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Minaeian S, Liu J, Son YJ (2016) Vision-based target detection and localization via a team of cooperative UAV and UGVs. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 46:1005–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Subong S, Bhoram L, Jihoon K (2008) Vision-based real-time target localization for single-antenna GPS-guided UAV. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 44:1391–1401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yan M, Du P, Wang HL et al (2012) Ground multi-target positioning algorithm for airborne optoelectronic system. J Appl Opt 33:717–720

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bagadi K, Annepu V, Susmita D (2016) Recent trends in multiuser detection techniques for SDMA–OFDM communication system. Phys Commun 20:93–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ravikumar CV, Kalapraveen B (2017) Design of MC-CDMA receiver using radial basis function network to mitigate multiple access interference and nonlinear distortion. Neural Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-3127-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ravikumar CV, Kalapraveen B (2017) MC–CDMA receiver design using recurrent neural networks for eliminating multiple access interference and nonlinear distortion. Int J Commun Syst 30:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kalapraveen B, Susmita D (2013) Neural network-based adaptive multiuser detection schemes in SDMA–OFDM system for wireless application. Neural Comput Appl 23:1071–1082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Guangjie H, Jinfang J, Chenyu Z, Trung Q, Duong MG, George KK (2016) A survey on mobile anchor node assisted localization in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 18:2220–2242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kurt H (1989) Multilayer feed forward networks are universal approximators. Neural Netw 2:359–366

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Khawaja W, Guvenc I, Matolak D (2016) UWB channel sounding and modeling for UAV air-to-ground propagation channels. IEEE Glob Commu Conf 2016:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  33. Khuwaja A, Chen Y, Zhao N, Alouini M, Dobbins P (2018) A survey of channel modeling for UAV communications. IEEE Commu Surv Tutor 20:2804–2821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Popescu Dan et al (2018) A collaborative UAV-WSN Network for monitoring large areas. Sensors (Basel) 18(12):4202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Villas Leandro A et al (2015) An energy efficient joint localization and synchronization solution for wireless sensor networks using unmanned aerial vehicle. Wirel Netw 21(2):485–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Annepu V, Rajesh A (2019) Implementation of an efficient extreme learning machine for node localization in unmanned aerial vehicle assisted wireless sensor networks. Int J Commun Syst. https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.4173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Annepu V, Rajesh A (2019) Implementation of self adaptive mutation factor and cross-over probability based differential evolution algorithm for node localization in wireless sensor networks. Evolut Intell 12(3):469–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that the work presented in this article is not supported by any funding agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Rajesh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Annepu, V., Rajesh, A. An unmanned aerial vehicle-aided node localization using an efficient multilayer perceptron neural network in wireless sensor networks. Neural Comput & Applic 32, 11651–11663 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04653-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04653-4

Keywords

Navigation