Skip to main content
Log in

Damage identification method of prestressed concrete beam bridge based on convolutional neural network

  • S.I.: DPTA Conference 2019
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bridges play an important role in transportation, but because of overload and natural factors, bridges will inevitably be damaged, which will affect traffic and even lead to major accidents. Therefore, timely and accurate identification of bridge damage is extremely necessary. Because of the great danger of manual detection, in order to identify the damage of prestressed concrete girder bridge safely, conveniently and accurately, this paper proposes a method of damage identification of prestressed concrete girder bridge based on convolutional neural network, which realizes the intelligent identification of bridge damage. Firstly, the damage identification method based on the flexibility matrix is introduced, and the flexibility diagonal curvature index constructed by the diagonal element of flexibility matrix is introduced. Secondly, the basic principle of applying convolutional neural network to bridge damage identification is elaborated. Finally, combined with the flexibility curvature method and the convolutional neural network, the flexibility of the structure is selected as the input of the convolutional neural network to realize the bridge damage identification. Through simulation, it is found that the use of convolutional neural network for the bridge identification is feasible, and combined with the flexibility curvature method, it can well identify the damage location and damage degree of prestressed concrete beam bridge structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhao Z, Chen C (2002) A fuzzy system for concrete bridge damage diagnosis. Comput Struct 80(7):629–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Banerjee S, Shinozuka M (2008) Mechanistic quantification of RC bridge damage states under earthquake through fragility analysis. Probab Eng Mech 23(1):12–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaloop MR, Li H (2011) Sensitivity and analysis GPS signals based bridge damage using GPS observations and wavelet transform. Measurement 44(5):927–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Silva M, Santos A, Figueiredo E et al (2016) A novel unsupervised approach based on a genetic algorithm for structural damage detection in bridges. Eng Appl Artif Intell 52(C):168–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dziedziech K, Pieczonka L, Kijanka P et al (2016) Enhanced nonlinear crack-wave interactions for structural damage detection based on guided ultrasonic waves. Struct Control Health Monit 23(8):1108–1120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zak G, Wylomanska A, Zimroz R (2018) Local damage detection method based on distribution distances applied to time–frequency map of vibration signal. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 54(5):4091–4103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Xiao-Long XU, Xiang S, Wei Z (2013) Influence of signal-noise ratio on global damage detection of offshore platform. Noise Vib Control 33(4):212–218

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cawley D, Oliver D, Billings J et al (2012) Using consensus methodology to identify events that could trigger holistic assessment in severe COPD. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2(Suppl 1):A29–A30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Islam MR, Smrity RA, Chatterjee S et al (2020) Optimization of protein folding using chemical reaction optimization in HP cubic lattice model. Neural Comput Appl 32:3117–3134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tikhonov DA, Sobolev EV (2010) An averaged over molecular trajectories method of integral equations of the theory of liquids in RISM approximation. Math Biol Bioinform 5(2):188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang X, Hu N, Fukunaga H et al (2001) Structural damage identification using static test data and changes in frequencies. Eng Struct 23(6):610–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nie ZH, Cheng LY, Hong-Wei MA (2011) Visualization method for structural damage detection based on its dynamic characteristics. J Vib Shock 30(12):7–13

    Google Scholar 

  13. Xiong CB, Lu HL, Zhu JS (2018) Reality of virtual damage identification based on neural networks and vibration analysis of a damaged bridge under a moving vehicle. Neural Comput Appl 29(5):1331–1341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yu Z, Xia H, Goicolea JM et al (2016) Bridge damage identification from moving load induced deflection based on wavelet transform and Lipschitz exponent. Int J Struct Stab Dyn 16(05):91–105

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Ni YQ, Zhou HF, Chan KC et al (2010) Modal flexibility analysis of cable-stayed Ting Kau bridge for damage identification. Comput Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 23(3):223–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Perera R, Fang SE, Ruiz A (2010) Application of particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithms to multiobjective damage identification inverse problems with modelling errors. Meccanica 45(5):723–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shadan F, Khoshnoudian F, Esfandiari A (2016) A frequency response-based structural damage identification using model updating method. Struct Control Health Monit 23(2):286–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Son CN, Kim TE, Park K et al (2016) Simplified radiographic damage index for affected joints in chronic gouty arthritis. J Korean Med Sci 31(3):435–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chamkalani A (2016) A novel technique for screening of asphaltene deposition by the pattern recognition method. Energy Sources 38(3):450–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shao YH, Deng NY, Yang ZM (2016) Least squares recursive projection twin support vector machine for classification. Int J Mach Learn Cybernet 7(3):411–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ren T, Shi L, Yan G et al (2016) Temperature prediction of the molten salt collector tube using BP neural network. IET Renew Power Generation 10(2):212–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen X, Shen W, Dai M et al (2016) Robust adaptive sliding-mode observer using RBF neural network for lithium-ion battery state of charge estimation in electric vehicles. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 65(4):1936–1947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gonzalez I, Karoumi R (2015) BWIM aided damage detection in bridges using machine learning. J Civil Struct Health Monit 5(5):715–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Diao YS, Ren H (2014) Structural damage early warning based on AR model and factor analysis. J Vib Shock 33(18):115–119

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kwon KS, Lin RM (2005) Robust damage location in structures using Taguchi method. J Struct Eng 131(4):629–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bo C, Zang C (2011) A hybrid immune model for unsupervised structural damage pattern recognition. Expert Syst Appl 38(3):1650–1658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bo C, Swartz RA (2011) Comparison study of feature extraction methods in structural damage pattern recognition. Proc SPIE 7981(3):765–768

    Google Scholar 

  28. Xiang CS, Zhou Y, Di SK et al (2015) Detection indicator of structural nondestructive damage based on flexibility curvature difference rate. Appl Mech Mater 744–746(5):46–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sailor HB, Patil HA (2016) Novel unsupervised auditory filterbank learning using convolutional RBM for speech recognition. IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Language Process 24(12):2341–2353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Anthimopoulos M, Christodoulidis S, Ebner L et al (2016) Lung pattern classification for interstitial lung diseases using a deep convolutional neural network. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 35(5):1207–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Han S, Vasconcelos N (2014) Object recognition with hierarchical discriminant saliency networks. Front Comput Neurosci 8(109):109–128

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Hebei Provincial Natural Science Foundation Funded Project (E2018201106), Hebei Province High-level Talents Funding Project (B2017005024), Ministry of Transport Technology Demonstration Project (2016009), Ministry of Transport Technology Demonstration Project (2016010), Sino-Ukrainian Science and Technology Exchange Project (CU03-32), Hebei Provincial Department of Transportation Science and Technology Project (TH-201918), Hebei Provincial Department of Transportation Science and Technology Project (TH-201925) and Xinjiang Provincial Department of Science and Technology Project (2018E02075).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Huang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no potential competing interests in our paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, S., Huang, Y. Damage identification method of prestressed concrete beam bridge based on convolutional neural network. Neural Comput & Applic 33, 535–545 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05052-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05052-w

Keywords

Navigation