Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Performance evaluation of manufacturing collaborative logistics based on BP neural network and rough set

  • S.I. : DPTA Conference 2019
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The collaborative logistics in manufacturing industry has a greater impact on its operation effect, and there are many hidden factors. In order to improve the performance evaluation of manufacturing collaborative logistics, this study builds a combined performance evaluation model based on BP neural network and rough set. Moreover, this study uses the rough set attribute reduction theory to screen and optimize the evaluation indicators to obtain the key performance indicator set, and then uses BP neural network to predict and evaluate the key performance indicator data, which greatly reduces the number of training times and shortens the learning time. In addition, in this study, a case analysis was used to solve the performance evaluation model of manufacturing collaborative logistics based on rough set and BP neural network, and corresponding strategies were given. The research results show that the method proposed in this paper has certain effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhenzhen W, Yingjie WU, Economics SO et al (2018) Stability analysis of interactive development between manufacturing enterprise and logistics enterprise based on Logistic-Volterra model. J Comput Appl 38(02):589–595

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zekić Z (2018) The project approach to development of a logistics concept of enterprise management. Zbornik radova Veleučilišta u Šibeniku 1-2/2018:107–114

    Google Scholar 

  3. Niu EX, Meng B, Shen SY (2017) Evaluation model and empirical study of port enterprise green logistics based on cloud model. Dalian Haishi Daxue Xuebao/J Dalian Marit Univ 43(2):67–74

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beker K, Garces-Descovich A, Mangosing J et al (2017) Optimizing MRI logistics: prospective analysis of performance, efficiency, and patient throughput. AJR Am J Roentgenol 209(4):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dittes S, Smolnik S (2019) Towards a digital work environment: the influence of collaboration and networking on employee performance within an enterprise social media platform. J Bus Econ 89(8–9):1215–1243

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jia F, Yang Z, Jiang L (2018) The effects of government relation and institutional environments on channel performance. Asia Pac J Market Logist 30(2):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  7. Edirisinghe L, Jayathilake S (2013) Frontier Logistics performance in Sri Lanka-The role play of the Customs. In: International research symposium

  8. Alvarado CSM, Garcia C (2018) Implementation of KPIs for analyzing control loop performance by using PI system of the OSIsoft enterprise. IEEE Latin Am Trans 16(1):59–65

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Rahim RA, Mahmood NHN, Masrom M (2017) Innovation and knowledge management as the catalyst of small medium enterprise’s performance: a conceptual paper. Adv Sci Lett 23(4):2727–2730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee ES (2016) Knowledge Sharing within an Intermodal Logistics Network and Logistics Performance. J Int Trade Commer 12(4):37–51

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tuan LT (2017) Under entrepreneurial orientation, how does logistics performance activate customer value co-creation behavior? Int J Logist Manag 28(2):600–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Qi Y, Sun Y, Lang M (2017) Evaluating the performance of the logistics parks: a state-of-the-art review. In: International conference on intelligent and interactive systems and applications. Springer, Cham, pp 42–48

  13. Khan SAR, Zhang Y, Kumar A, Zavadskas E, Streimikiene D (2020) Measuring the impact of renewable energy, public health expenditure, logistics and environmental performance on sustainable economic growth. Sustain Dev. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chew W (2018) Performance and risk: logistics and transportation company in Malaysia. Mpra Paper

  15. Mamun AA, Nasir WMNBWM (2017) Effect of market and interaction orientations on innovation orientation and enterprise performance. Adv Sci Lett 23(4):2925–2928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhu Y, Zhang L, Zhao H et al (2017) Significantly improved electrochemical performance of CF x promoted by SiO 2 modification for primary lithium batteries. J Mater Chem A 5(2):796–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ullah S, Williams CC, Arif BW (2019) The impacts of informality on enterprise innovation, survival and performance: some evidence from Pakistan. J Dev Entrep 24(03):1950015

    Google Scholar 

  18. Arredondo-Hidalgo MG (2017) Análisis de las capacidades logísticas internacionales de las pymes del estado de guanajuato. Revista Global de Negocios 5(6):19–34

    Google Scholar 

  19. Michelberger B, Hipp M, Mutschler B (2017) Process-oriented information logistics: requirements, techniques, application. In: Reichert M, Oberhauser R, Grambow G (eds) Advances in intelligent process-aware information systems. Springer, Cham, pp 127–153

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Jie X, Daoyin S, Information SO (2017) A study of the relationship among enterprise social capital, technical knowledge acquisition and product innovation performance. Manag Rev 29(05):23–39

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhonggao ZXL (2017) Control right transfer, material weaknesses in internal control and enterprise performance: empirical research based on enterprise life cycle theory. J Bus Econ 09:46–60

    Google Scholar 

  22. Octavia A, Zulfanetti E (2017) Influence models of entrepreneurial orientation, entrepreneurship training, and business performance of small medium enterprises. Adv Sci Lett 23(8):7232–7234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jianxiang W, Yiting Z (2018) The influence of social capital on enterprise performance: based on the economic transition stage of China. Manag Rev 1:6

    Google Scholar 

  24. Naseem T, Shahzad F, Asim GA et al (2019) Corporate social responsibility engagement and firm performance in Asia Pacific: the role of enterprise risk management. Corp Social Responsib Environ Manag 27:501–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lu WM, Kweh QL, He DS et al (2017) Performance analysis of the cultural and creative industry: a network-based approach. Naval Res Logist (NRL) 64(8):662–676

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Business School, Shandong Technology and Business University, Yantai, 264005, Shandong, China

    Jianli Gao

Authors
  1. Jianli Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianli Gao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, J. Performance evaluation of manufacturing collaborative logistics based on BP neural network and rough set. Neural Comput & Applic 33, 739–754 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05099-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05099-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation