Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Efficiency evaluation research of a regional water system based on a game cross-efficiency model

  • S.I.: AI-based Web Information Processing
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To solve the problem of regional water system evaluation, this paper proposes a system efficiency evaluation method based on the game cross-efficiency model and conducts an empirical analysis. First, autopoiesis is introduced as the theoretical basis. The characteristics of the authigenic system are combined with a regional water system, and the connotation and characteristics of the regional water system are defined. Second, based on the competitive relationship between regional water systems, the existing game crossover efficiency model is improved. A crossover efficiency model of other games is proposed to evaluate the efficiency of regional water systems. Then, the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration is selected as the research object. The effects of four systematic evaluation methods based on the DEA method are compared horizontally to find the optimal system efficiency evaluation method. Finally, the characteristics of the regional water system in the Pearl River Delta are systematically analysed through the evaluation results, and the present situation of the regional water system is fully explained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lobbrecht AH (1997) Dynamic water-system control - design and operation of regional water-resources systems

  2. Zhang Xiaoyu Xu, Zhouyangfan DL, Zhirong Z (2019) Simulation and regulation of the evolution of Alashan’s “three generations” water use system based on system dynamics. Arid Land Resour Environ 33(08):107–113

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yuebin W, Changqing L, Yuan Li, Xiaohui W (2018) Analysis on the evolution of water system structure characteristics based on the multi-watershed ecological network model. China Environ Sci 38(02):755–765

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wang Yousen Xu, Hao BY (2016) Industrial water system efficiency evaluation: two-stage DEA considering the characteristics of pollutants that can be treated. Chinese Manag Sci 24(03):169–176

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yanhu H, Biao L, Xiaohong C, Kairong L, Xiaoqing W (2014) Analysis of coordination degree of water system of Dongjiang river basin under changing environment. People’s Yangtze River 45(15):27–31

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wenjuan C, Zhongmin L, Xiaojing F (2011) Research on the impact of water transfer projects on the coordination of regional industrial water systems. South-to-North Water Transf Water Conserv Sci Technol 9(05):19–22

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sheping L, Jiancang X, Mingcong H, Hongqi C (2004) Analysis of coordination degree of regional industrial water system. J Hydraul Eng 05:14–21

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jing C, Kai Y, Yong Z, Jun Z (2008) Application of grey coordination degree model in industrial water system analysis. Resour Environ Yangtze Basin 05:688–692

    Google Scholar 

  9. Varela FG, Maturana HR, Uribe R (1974) Autopoiesis: the organization of living systems, its characterization and a model. Curr Mod Biol 5(4):187–196

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lei Z (2020) The game evolution, efficiency evaluation and influencing factors of library discipline and business system. Libr Sci Res 13:9–17

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ren T, Li S, Zhou Z, Li S, Xiao H (2021) Research on the system efficiency evaluation of regional sustainable development based on satisfaction BLP-DEA [J/OL]. China Manag Sci. https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.0080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. He B (2014) Applied research on logistics system efficiency evaluation based on fuzzy DEA model. Appl Mech Mater 3468:6189–6191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Linlin Z, Yong Z, Yuliang Z et al (2019) Data envelopment analysis for sustainability evaluation in China: tackling the economic, environmental, and social dimensions. Eur J Oper Res 275(3):1083–1095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liang L, Wu J, Cook WD et al (2008) Alternative secondary goals in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation. Int J Prod Econ 113(2):1025–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liang L, Jie W, Cook WD et al (2008) The DEA game cross-efficiency model and its nash equilibrium. Oper Res 56(5):1278–1288

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Salmasnia A, Rahimi A, Abdzadeh B (2019) An integration of NSGA-II and DEA for economic–statistical design of T2-Hotelling control chart with double warning lines. Neural Comput & Applic 31:1173–1194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hatami-Marbini A, Saati S (2020) Measuring performance with common weights: network DEA. Neural Comput & Applic 32:3599–3617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu J, Xu Q, Chen H et al (2019) Group decision making with interval fuzzy preference relations based on DEA and stochastic simulation. Neural Comput Appli 31:3095–3106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shengzong Z, Zaiwu G (2017) DEA game cross-efficiency method considering the dynamic changes of decision-making unit competition and cooperation. Op Res Manag 26(05):21-27+36

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhou Q, Xu Z, Yen Neil Y (2019) User sentiment analysis based on social network information and its application in consumer reconstruction intention. Comput Hum Behav 100:177–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lin Li, Haijun H, Shouyang W (2016) Research on the evaluation of academic journals based on DEA/AR game cross-efficiency method. J Manag Sci 19(04):118–126

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kuzlu M, Fair C, Guler O (2021) Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Internet of Things (IoT) cybersecurity. Discov Internet Things 1:7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu W, Wang YM, Lv S (2017) An aggressive game cross-efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis. Ann Oper Res 259(1–2):241–258

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Kawamoto H (2016) Third generation system theory: autogenic system theory. Central Compilation and Translation Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ke W (2018) System comprehensive evaluation and data envelopment analysis method: modeling and application. Science Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. China Aerospace Academy of Systems Science and Engineering, Beijing, 100035, China

    Wenyu Zhang, Hongze Yu & Lu Ren

  2. Xi’an University of Posts and Telecommunications, Xi’an Shaanxi, 710061, China

    Wenyu Zhang, Lu Ren & Qing Dong

  3. PipeChina Oil&Gas Control Centre Beijing, Beijing, 100013, China

    Chenxiao Zhao

Authors
  1. Wenyu Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hongze Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lu Ren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qing Dong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chenxiao Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenyu Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The author(s) declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, W., Yu, H., Ren, L. et al. Efficiency evaluation research of a regional water system based on a game cross-efficiency model. Neural Comput & Applic 34, 9441–9454 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06381-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06381-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation