Skip to main content
Log in

Deep localization of subcellular protein structures from fluorescence microscopy images

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accurate localization of proteins from fluorescence microscopy images is challenging due to the inter-class similarities and intra-class disparities introducing grave concerns in addressing multi-class classification problems. Conventional machine learning-based image prediction pipelines rely heavily on pre-processing such as normalization and segmentation followed by handcrafted feature extraction to identify useful, informative, and application-specific features. Here, we demonstrate that deep learning-based pipelines can effectively classify protein images from different datasets. We propose an end-to-end Protein Localization Convolutional Neural Network (PLCNN) that classifies protein images more accurately and reliably. PLCNN processes raw imagery without involving any pre-processing steps and produces outputs without any customization or parameter adjustment for a particular dataset. Experimental analysis is performed on five benchmark datasets. PLCNN consistently outperformed the existing state-of-the-art approaches from traditional machine learning and deep architectures. This study highlights the importance of deep learning for the analysis of fluorescence microscopy protein imagery. The proposed deep pipeline can better guide drug designing procedures in the pharmaceutical industry and open new avenues for researchers in computational biology and bioinformatics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Publicly available datasets are used in this study.

Notes

  1. Code available at https://github.com/saeed-anwar/PLCNN.

References

  1. Yang F, Xu YY, Wang ST, Shen HB (2014) Image-based classification of protein subcellular location patterns in human reproductive tissue by ensemble learning global and local features. Neurocomputing 131:113–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chong YT, Koh JL, Friesen H, Duffy SK, Cox MJ, Moses A, Moffat J, Boone C, Andrews BJ (2015) Yeast proteome dynamics from single cell imaging and automated analysis. Cell 161(6):1413–1424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pärnamaa T, Parts L (2017) Accurate classification of protein subcellular localization from high-throughput microscopy images using deep learning. G3 Genes Genomes Genet 7(5):1385–1392

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shao W, Ding Y, Shen HB, Zhang D (2017) Deep model-based feature extraction for predicting protein subcellular localizations from bio-images. Front Comput Sci 11(2):243–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Glory E, Murphy RF (2007) Automated subcellular location determination and high-throughput microscopy. Dev Cell 12(1):7–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xu YY, Yao LX, Shen HB (2018) Bioimage-based protein subcellular location prediction: a comprehensive review. Front Comput Sci 12(1):26–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tahir M, Khan A, Majid A (2011) Protein subcellular localization of fluorescence imagery using spatial and transform domain features. Bioinformatics 28(1):91–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Itzhak DN, Tyanova S, Cox J, Borner GH (2016) Global, quantitative and dynamic mapping of protein subcellular localization. Elife 5:e16950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Xiang S, Liang Q, Hu Y, Tang P, Coppola G, Zhang D, Sun W (2019) Amc-net: asymmetric and multi-scale convolutional neural network for multi-label hpa classification. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 178:275–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kreft M, Milisav I, Potokar M, Zorec R (2004) Automated high through-put colocalization analysis of multichannel confocal images. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 74(1):63–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tahir M, Khan A (2016) Protein subcellular localization of fluorescence microscopy images: employing new statistical and texton based image features and svm based ensemble classification. Inf Sci 345:65–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Boland MV, Markey MK, Murphy RF (1998) Automated recognition of patterns characteristic of subcellular structures in fluorescence microscopy images. Cytom J Int Soc Anal Cytol 33(3):366–375

    Google Scholar 

  13. Murphy RF, Boland MV, Velliste M et al (2000) Towards a systematics for protein subcellular location: quantitative description of protein localization patterns and automated analysis of fluorescence microscope images. In: ISMB, pp 251–259

  14. Huang K, Murphy RF (2004) Boosting accuracy of automated classification of fluorescence microscope images for location proteomics. BMC Bioinform 5(1):78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hamilton NA, Pantelic RS, Hanson K, Teasdale RD (2007) Fast automated cell phenotype image classification. BMC Bioinform 8(1):110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chebira A, Barbotin Y, Jackson C, Merryman T, Srinivasa G, Murphy RF, Kovačević J (2007) A multiresolution approach to automated classification of protein subcellular location images. BMC Bioinform 8(1):210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nanni L, Lumini A (2008) A reliable method for cell phenotype image classification. Artif Intell Med 43(2):87–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nanni L, Lumini A, Brahnam S (2010) Local binary patterns variants as texture descriptors for medical image analysis. Artif Intell Med 49(2):117–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Li C, Wang Xh, Zheng L, Huang Jf (2013) Automated protein subcellular localization based on local invariant features. Protein J 32(3):230–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang B, Pham TD (2011) Phenotype recognition with combined features and random subspace classifier ensemble. BMC Bioinform 12(1):128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tahir M, Jan B, Hayat M, Shah SU, Amin M (2018) Efficient computational model for classification of protein localization images using extended threshold adjacency statistics and support vector machines. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 157:205–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nanni L, Ghidoni S, Brahnam S (2017) Handcrafted vs. non-handcrafted features for computer vision classification. Pattern Recogn 71:158–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Xiao M, Shen X, Pan W (2019) Application of deep convolutional neural networks in classification of protein subcellular localization with microscopy images. Genet Epidemiol 43(3):330–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kraus OZ, Grys BT, Ba J, Chong Y, Frey BJ, Boone C, Andrews BJ (2017) Automated analysis of high-content microscopy data with deep learning. Mol Syst Biol 13(4):924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Le NQK, Huynh TT, Yapp EKY, Yeh HY (2019) Identification of clathrin proteins by incorporating hyperparameter optimization in deep learning and pssm profiles. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 177:81–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang L, Yu G, Xia D, Wang J (2019) Protein-protein interactions prediction based on ensemble deep neural networks. Neurocomputing 324:10–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Guo Y, Shang X, Li Z (2019) Identification of cancer subtypes by integrating multiple types of transcriptomics data with deep learning in breast cancer. Neurocomputing 324:20–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gu J, Wang Z, Kuen J, Ma L, Shahroudy A, Shuai B, Liu T, Wang X, Wang G, Cai J et al (2018) Recent advances in convolutional neural networks. Pattern Recogn 77:354–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dürr O, Sick B (2016) Single-cell phenotype classification using deep convolutional neural networks. J Biomol Screen 21(9):998–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE (2012) Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, pp 1097–1105

  31. Tibshirani R (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol) 58(1):267–288

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Godinez WJ, Hossain I, Lazic SE, Davies JW, Zhang X (2017) A multi-scale convolutional neural network for phenotyping high-content cellular images. Bioinformatics 33(13):2010–2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Simonyan K, Zisserman A (2015) Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. In: Proceedings of the international conference on learning representations

  34. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J (2016) Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 770–778

  35. Szegedy C, Ioffe S, Vanhoucke V, Alemi AA (2017) Inception-v4, inception-resnet and the impact of residual connections on learning. In: AAAI, vol 4, p 12

  36. Sabour S, Frosst N, Hinton GE (2017) Dynamic routing between capsules. In: NIPS, pp 3856–3866

  37. Lao Q, Fevens T (2019) Cell phenotype classification using deep residual network and its variants. Int J Pattern Recognit Artif Intell 33(11):1940017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zagoruyko S, Komodakis N (2016) Wide residual networks. In: Proceedings of the British machine vision conference (BMVC). BMVA Press, pp 1–12

  39. Xie S, Girshick R, Dollár P, Tu Z, He K (2017) Aggregated residual transformations for deep neural networks. In: CVPR. IEEE, pp 5987–5995

  40. Han D, Kim J, Kim J (2017) Deep pyramidal residual networks. In: CVPR. IEEE, pp 6307–6315

  41. Huang G, Liu Z, Van Der Maaten L, Weinberger KQ (2016) Densely connected convolutional networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 4700–4708

  42. Anwar S, Barnes N (2020) Densely residual Laplacian super-resolution. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell

  43. Boland MV, Murphy RF (2001) A neural network classifier capable of recognizing the patterns of all major subcellular structures in fluorescence microscope images of hela cells. Bioinformatics 17(12):1213–1223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Szegedy C, Liu W, Jia Y, Sermanet P, Reed S, Anguelov D, Erhan D, Vanhoucke V, Rabinovich A (2015) Going deeper with convolutions. In: CVPR, pp 1–9

  45. Ruder S (2016) An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.04747

  46. Ljosa V, Sokolnicki KL, Carpenter AE (2012) Annotated high-throughput microscopy image sets for validation. Nat Methods 9(7):637–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Selvaraju RR, Cogswell M, Das A, Vedantam R, Parikh D, Batra D (2017) Grad-cam: visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. In: ICCV, pp 618–626

  48. Nanni L, Brahnam S, Alessandra L (2010) Selecting the best performing rotation invariant patterns in local binary/ternary patterns. In: International conference on IP, computer vision, and pattern recognition, pp 369–375

  49. Lin CC, Tsai YS, Lin YS, Chiu TY, Hsiung CC, Lee MI, Simpson JC, Hsu CN (2007) Boosting multiclass learning with repeating codes and weak detectors for protein subcellular localization. Bioinformatics 23(24):3374–3381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Nanni L, Brahnam S, Ghidoni S, Lumini A (2018) Bioimage classification with handcrafted and learned features. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinf 16(3):874–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Nanni L, Brahnam S, Ghidoni S, Maguolo G (2019) General purpose (genp) bioimage ensemble of handcrafted and learned features with data augmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.08084

  52. Anwar S, Barnes N (October 2019) Real image denoising with feature attention. In: ICCV

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Tahir.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

Since no experiments are performed on humans or animals (dead or alive) in this research, therefore, Ethical approval is not required.

Code availability

Code available at https://github.com/saeed-anwar/PLCNN

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tahir, M., Anwar, S., Mian, A. et al. Deep localization of subcellular protein structures from fluorescence microscopy images. Neural Comput & Applic 34, 5701–5714 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06715-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06715-y

Keywords

Navigation