Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-view multi-label-based online method with threefold correlations and dynamic updating multi-region

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Semi-supervised real-time generation multi-view multi-label data sets are widely encountered in practical applications. A key issue is how to process the data whose information including labels or features may be lost due to some unforeknowable factors. In our work, we develop a multi-view multi-label-based online method with threefold correlations and dynamic updating multi-region (M2CR) to solve this issue. First, we adopt three kinds of correlations between features and labels to recover the missing information. Second, we process new arriving instances with dynamic updating multi-region. Experiments on classical multi-view multi-label data sets validate the effectiveness of M2CR in terms of classification, time performance, convergence, etc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. multi-view based multi-label propagation for image annotation

  2. multi-view conditional random fields

  3. multi-view label embedding model

  4. trigraph regularized collective matrix tri-factorization framework

  5. multi-view ensemble learning with contextual features

  6. multi-label streaming feature selection based on neighbourhood rough set

  7. semi-supervised multi-view clustering based on orthonormality-constrained NMF

  8. multi-view matrix completion

  9. multi-view vector-valued manifold regularization

  10. individuality- and commonality-based multi-view multi-label learning

  11. block-row sparse multi-view multi-label learning

  12. indeed, we get the classification performances about accuracy, acc\(^{+}\)-true positive rate, acc\(^{-}\)-true negative rate, PPV-positive predictive value, F-measure, and G-mean [64], but with the limitation of the length for paper, only performances about accuracy are shown. While this would not disturb our conclusions.

  13. the ranks are given on the base of the six classification indexes

  14. with the limitation of the length for paper, we only show the results in terms of the accuracy under the semi-supervised case. Indeed, for other cases, the conclusions are same

  15. indeed, in our experiments expect for this subsection, we show the results with a feasible percentage of training instances set, namely, the percentage accords to best parameters

  16. adjusted weight voting random forest

  17. matrix completion for multi-view weak label learning

  18. pseudo-label conditional generative adversarial imputation networks for incomplete data

  19. multi-view semi-supervised learning for classification on dynamic networks

  20. online semi-supervised active learning framework

  21. semi-supervised one-pass multi-view learning

References

  1. Zhu Y, Kwok JT, Zhou ZH (2018) Multi-label learning with global and local label correlation. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 30(6):1081–1094

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tan QY, Yu GX, Domeniconi C, Wang J, Zhang ZL (2018) Multi-view weak-label learning based on matrix completion. In: Proceedings of the 2018 SIAM international conference on data mining (SIAM 2018), pp 450–458

  3. Zong LL, Miao FQ, Zhang XC, Liu XY, Yu H (2021) Incomplete multi-view clustering with partially mapped instances and clusters. Knowl-Based Syst 212:106615

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hu XC, Pedrycz W, Wu KY, Shen YH (2021) Information granule-based classifier: a development of granular imputation of missing data. Knowl-Based Syst 214:106737

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sun L, Wang LY, Ding WP, Qian YH, Xu JC (2020) Neighborhood multi-granulation rough sets-based attribute reduction using Lebesgue and entropy measures in incomplete neighborhood decision systems. Knowl-Based Syst 192:105373

    Google Scholar 

  6. Park LAF, Bezdek JC, Leckie C, Kotagiri R, Bailey J, Palaniswami M (2016) Visual assessment of clustering tendency for incomplete data. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 28(12):3409–3422

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang XS, Zhuang Y, Wang W, Pedrycz W (2018) Online feature transformation learning for cross-domain object category recognition. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 29(7):2857–2871

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Yan YG, Wu QY, Tan MK, Ng MK, Min HQ, Tsang IW (2018) Online heterogeneous transfer by hedge ensemble of offline and online decisions. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 29(7):3252–3263

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Li GX, Shen YL, Zhao PL, Lu X, Liu J, Liu YY, Hoi SCH (2019) Detecting cyberattacks in industrial control systems using online learning algorithms. Neurocomputing 364:338–348

    Google Scholar 

  10. Qian BY, Wang X, Ye JP, Davidson I (2015) A reconstruction error based framework for multi-label and multi-view learning. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 27(3):594–607

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nie FP, Tian L, Wang R, Li XL (2020) Multiview semi-supervised learning model for image classification. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 32(12):2389–2400

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bai L, Liang JY, Cao FY (2021) Semi-supervised clustering with constraints of different types from multiple information sources. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 43(9):3247–3258

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jia XD, Jing XY, Zhu XK, Chen SC, Du B, Cai ZY, De ZY, Yue D (2021) Semi-supervised multi-view deep discriminant representation learning. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 43(7):2496–2509

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gao C, Zhou J, Miao DQ, Wen JJ, Yue XD (2021) Three-way decision with co-training for partially labeled data. Inf Sci 544:500–518

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. He L, Zhang H (2018) Kernel k-means sampling for Nystr\(\ddot{o}\)m approximation. IEEE Trans Image Process 27(5):2108–2120

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Li M, Bi W, Kwok JT, Lu BL (2015) Large-scale Nystr\(\ddot{o}\)m kernel matrix approximation using randomized SVD. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 26(1):152–164

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhong G, Pun CM (2020) Revisiting Nystr\(\ddot{o}\)m extension for hypergraph clustering. Neurocomputing 403:247–256

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhu CM, Wang Z, Zhou RG, Wei L, Zhang XF, Ding Y (2019) Semi-supervised one-pass multi-view learning. Neural Comput Appl 31:8117–8134

    Google Scholar 

  19. Davenport MA, Romberg J (2016) An overview of low-rank matrix recovery from incomplete observations. IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process 10(4):608–622

    Google Scholar 

  20. Peng SJ, He GF, Liu X, Wang HZ (2015) Hierarchical block-based incomplete human mocap data recovery using adaptive nonnegative matrix factorization. Comput Gr 49:10–23

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang L, Zhao Y, Zhu ZF, Shen DG, Ji SW (2018) Multi-view missing data completion. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 30(7):1296–1309

    Google Scholar 

  22. Niu GL, Yang YL, Sun LQ (2021) One-step multi-view subspace clustering with incomplete views. Neurocomputing 438:290–301

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lin WC, Tsai CF (2020) Missing value imputation: a review and analysis of the literature [2006-2017]. Artif Intell Rev 53:1487–1509

    Google Scholar 

  24. Garciarena U, Santana R (2017) An extensive analysis of the interaction between missing data types, imputation methods, and supervised classifiers. Expert Syst Appl 89:52–65

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shao J, Meng W, Sun GD (2017) Evaluation of missing value imputation methods for wireless soil datasets. Pers Ubiquit Comput 21(1):113–123

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pati SK, Das AK (2017) Missing value estimation for microarray data through cluster analysis. Knowl Inf Syst 52(3):709–750

    Google Scholar 

  27. Oh S, Kang DD, Brock GN, Tseng GC (2011) Biological impact of missing-value imputation on downstream analyses of gene expression profiles. Bioinformatics 27(1):78–86

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mesquite DPP, Gomes JPP, Junior AHS, Nobre JS (2017) Euclidean distance estimation in incomplete datasets. Neurocomputing 248:11–18

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang L, Bing ZH, Zhang LY (2015) A hybrid clustering algorithm based on missing attribute interval estimation for incomplete data. Pattern Anal Appl 18:377–384

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Purwar A, Singh SK (2015) Hybrid prediction model with missing value imputation for medical data. Expert Syst Appl 42(13):5621–5631

    Google Scholar 

  31. Huang JL, Keung JW, Sarro F, Li YF, Yu YT, Chan WK, Sun HY (2017) Cross-validation based K nearest neighbor imputation for software quality datasets: an empirical study. J Syst Softw 132:226–252

    Google Scholar 

  32. Xia J, Zhang SY, Cai GL, Li L, Pan Q, Yan J, Ning GM (2017) Adjusted weight voting algorithm for random forests in handling missing values. Pattern Recogn 69:52–60

    Google Scholar 

  33. Yoon JS, Jordon J, Schaar MVD (2018) GAIN: missing data imputation using generative adversarial nets. In: Proceedings of the 35th international conference on machine learning (ICML 2018), vol 80, pp 5689–5698

  34. Wang YF, Li D, Li X, Yang M (2021) PC-GAIN: Pseudo-label conditional generative adversarial imputation networks for incomplete data. Neural Netw 141:395–403

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang Y, Zhou BH, Cai XR, Guo WY, Ding XK, Yuan XJ (2021) Missing value imputation in multivariate time series with end-to-end generative adversarial networks. Inf Sci 551:67–82

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Sun LJ, Ye P, Lyu GY, Feng SH, Dai GJ, Zhang H (2020) Weakly-supervised multi-label learning with noisy features and incomplete labels. Neurocomputing 413:61–71

    Google Scholar 

  37. Jiang L, Yu GX, Guo MZ, Wang J (2020) Feature selection with missing labels based on label compression and local feature correlation. Neurocomputing 395:95–106

    Google Scholar 

  38. Li LC, Liu HL, Zhou HJ, Zhang CD (2020) Missing data estimation method for time series data in structure health monitoring systems by probability principal component analysis. Adv Eng Softw 149:102901

    Google Scholar 

  39. Baisa NL (2021) Robust online multi-target visual tracking using a HISP filter with discriminative deep appearance learning. J Vis Commun Image Represent 77:102952

    Google Scholar 

  40. Li Z, Xing YY, Huang JM, Wang HB, Gao JL, Yu GX (2021) Large-scale online multi-view graph neural network and applications. Futur Gener Comput Syst 116:145–155

    Google Scholar 

  41. Chen C, Li YZ, Qian H, Zheng ZB, Hu YQ (2020) Multi-view semi-supervised learning for classification on dynamic networks. Knowl-Based Syst 195:105698

    Google Scholar 

  42. Nie XL, Fan MY, Huang XY, Yang WJ, Zhang B, Ma XS (2020) Online semisupervised active classification for multiview PolSAR data. IEEE Trans Cybern. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2020.3026741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhu CM (2016) Improved multi-kernel classification machine with Nystr\(\ddot{o}\)m approximation technique and universum data. Neurocomputing 175:610–634

    Google Scholar 

  44. Chua TS, Tang J, Hong R, Li H, Luo Z, Zheng Y (2009) Nus-wide: a real-world web image database from national university of Singapore. In: Proceedings of the ACM international conference on image and video retrieval, pp 48

  45. He ZY, Chen C, Bu JJ, Li P, Cai D (2015) Multi-view based multi-label propagation for image annotation. Neurocomputing 168:853–860

    Google Scholar 

  46. Sun XL, Sun SL, Yin MZ, Yang H (2020) Hybrid neural conditional random fields for multi-view sequence labeling. Knowl-Based Syst 189:105151

    Google Scholar 

  47. Duygulu P, Barnard K, Freitas JFGd, Forsyth DA (2002) Object recognition as machine translation: learning a lexicon for a fixed image vocabulary. In: Proceedings of the 7th European conference on computer vision-part IV (ECCV 2002), pp 97–112

  48. Huiskes MJ, Lew MS (2008) The mir flickr retrieval evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM international conference on multimedia information retrieval (MIR 2008), pp 39–43

  49. Makadia A, Pavlovic V, Kumar S (2008) A new baseline for image annotation. In: Proceedings of the 10th European conference on computer vision: part III (ECCV 2008), pp 316–329

  50. Ahn LV, Dabbish L (2004) Labeling images with a computer game. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI 2004), pp 319–326

  51. LozaMen\(\acute{c}\)ia E, F\(\breve{u}\)rnkranz J (2010) Efficient multilabel classification algorithms for large-scale problems in the legal domain. In: S Montemagni, W Peters, D Tiscornia (Eds.) Semantic processing of legal texts: where the language of law meets the law of language, Springer, Berlin, pp 192–215

  52. He ZY, Chen C, Bu JJ, Li P, Cai D (2015) Multi-view based multi-label propagation for image annotation. Neurocomputing 168:853–860

    Google Scholar 

  53. Zhu PF, Hu Q, Hu QH, Zhang CQ, Feng ZZ (2018) Multi-view label embedding. Pattern Recogn 84:126–135

    Google Scholar 

  54. Zhang JY, Rao Y, Zhang JL, Zhao YQ (2019) Trigraph regularized collective matrix tri-factorization framework on multiview features for multilabel image annotation. IEEE Access 7:161805–161821

    Google Scholar 

  55. Liu Y, Jiang CQ, Zhao HM (2018) Using contextual features and multi-view ensemble learning in product defect identification from online discussion forums. Decis Support Syst 105:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  56. Liu JH, Lin YY, Li YW, Weng W, Wu SX (2018) Online multi-label streaming feature selection based on neighborhood rough set. Pattern Recogn 84:273–287

    Google Scholar 

  57. Zhang HY, Pedrycz W, Miao DQ, Wei ZH (2014) From principal curves to granular principal curves. IEEE Trans Cybern 44(6):748–760

    Google Scholar 

  58. Lai ZH, Mo DM, Wong WK, Xu Y, Miao DQ, Zhang D (2018) Robust discriminant regression for feature extraction. IEEE Trans Cybern 48:2472–2484

    Google Scholar 

  59. Cai H, Liu B, Xiao YS, Lin LY (2020) Semi-supervised multi-view clustering based on orthonormality-constrained nonnegative matrix factorization. Inf Sci 536:171–184

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  60. Luo Y, Liu TL, Tao DC, Xu C (2015) Multiview matrix completion for multilabel image classification. IEEE Trans Image Process 24(8):2355–2368

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  61. Luo Y, Tao DC, Xu C, Xu C, Liu H, Wen YG (2013) Multiview vector-valued manifold regularization for multilabel image classification. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 24(5):709–722

    Google Scholar 

  62. Tan QY, Yu GX, Wang J, Domeniconi C, Zhang XL (2021) Individuality- and commonality-based multiview multilabel learning. IEEE Trans Cybern 51(3):1716–1727

    Google Scholar 

  63. Zhu XF, Li XL, Zhang SC (2016) Block-row sparse multi-view multi-label learning for image classification. IEEE Trans Cybern 46(2):450–461

    Google Scholar 

  64. Zhu CM, Wang Z (2017) Entropy-based matrix learning machine for imbalanced data sets. Pattern Recogn Lett 88:72–80

    Google Scholar 

  65. Demsar J (2006) Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets. J Mach Learn Res 7(1):1–30

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by ‘Chenguang Program’ supported by Shanghai Education Development Foundation and Shanghai Municipal Education Commission under Grant Number 18CG54. Furthermore, this work is also sponsored by National Natural Science Foundation of China (CN) under Grant Number 61602296. The authors would like to acknowledge their supports.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Changming Zhu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that can inappropriately influence our work; there is no professional or other personal interest of any nature or kind in any product, service, and/or company that could be construed as influencing the position presented in, or the review of, the manuscript entitled, ‘Multi-view multi-label-based Online Method with Threefold Correlations and Dynamic Updating Multi-Region’.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, C., Guo, S., Cao, D. et al. Multi-view multi-label-based online method with threefold correlations and dynamic updating multi-region. Neural Comput & Applic 34, 6097–6117 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06766-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06766-1

Keywords

Navigation