Skip to main content
Log in

Elementary cellular automaton Rule 110 explained as a block substitution system

Rule 110 as a block substitution system

  • Published:
Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents the characterization of Rule 110 as a block substitution system of three symbols. Firstly, it is proved that the dynamics of Rule 110 is equivalent to cover the evolution space with triangles formed by the cells of the automaton. It is hence demonstrated that every finite configuration can be partitioned in several blocks of symbols and, that the dynamics of Rule 110 can be reproduced by a set of production rules applied to them. The shape of the blocks in the current configuration can be used for knowing the number of them in the next one; with this, the evolution of random configurations, ether and gliders can be modeled.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wolfram S (1986) Theory and applications of cellular automata. World Scientific Press, Singapore

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Cook M (2004) Universality in elementary cellular automata. Complex Syst 15: 1–40

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Neary T, Woods D (2006) P-completeness of cellular automaton Rule 110. In: International colloquium on automata languages and programming (ICALP). LNCS, vol 4051, pp 132–143

  4. Richard G (2008) Rule 110: universality and catenations. In: Durand B (ed) Proceedings of the first symposium on cellular automata “Journées Automates Cellulaires”, pp 141–160

  5. Martínez G, McIntosh H, Seck-Tuoh-Mora J, Chapa-Vergara S (2008) Determining a regular language by glider-based structures called phases f i _1 in rule 110. J Cell Autom 3: 231–270

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. McIntosh H (1999) Rule 110 as it relates to the presence of gliders. http://delta.cs.cinvestav.mx/~mcintosh/comun/RULE110W/RULE110.html. Accessed 15 Aug 2009

  7. Martínez G, McIntosh H (2001) ATLAS: collisions of gliders like phases of ether in Rule 110. http://delta.cs.cinvestav.mx/~mcintosh/comun/summer2001/bookcollisionsHtml/bookcollisions.html. Accessed 16 Feb 2010

  8. Wolfram S (2002) A new kind of science. Wolfram Media, Champaign

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Kari J (1996) Representation of reversible cellular automata with block permutations. Math Syst Theory 29: 47–61

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan C. Seck-Tuoh-Mora.

Additional information

Communicated by R. Neruda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seck-Tuoh-Mora, J.C., Martínez, G.J., Hernández-Romero, N. et al. Elementary cellular automaton Rule 110 explained as a block substitution system. Computing 88, 193–205 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-010-0096-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-010-0096-x

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

Navigation