Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Towards Human Smart Cities: Internet of Things for sensory impaired individuals

  • Published:
Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cities are the places where the greatest technological changes will take place during the next few decades. Some years from now, important investments will be destined towards elaborating and implementing urban solutions. However, people with sensorial disabilities will still have to overcome the problem of autonomy in urban areas. Autonomy presumes the existence of the right conditions for complete relocation towards the desired destination. This is closely related to the process of planning buildings, sidewalks and signaling, among others and it is supported by legal measures, promoting accessibility. However, several barriers and the lack of information in urban areas should be faced meanwhile. In this paper, the features of a travel aid previously designed, were enhanced based on the Internet of Things—IoT. This approach has a goal to better suit the device to the smart cities’ context. To this end, an architecture combining both haptic feedback (tactile and auditory), acquiring relevant information from the environment, was designed. Quantitative and quantitative assessments obtained from experimental tests shows satisfactory results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://www.ultracane.com/.

  2. http://www.ksonar.com/.

  3. https://www.ultracane.com/.

References

  1. Akhbar F, Chang V, Yao Y, Méndez Muñoz V (2016) Outlook on moving of computing services towards the data sources. Int J Inf Manag 36(4):645–652 (ISSN: 0268-4012)

  2. Atzori L, Iera A, Morabito G (2010) The Internet of Things: a survey. Comput Netw 54(15):2787–2805. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Botterman M (2009) Internet of Things: an early reality of the Future Internet, Workshop Report prepared for European Commission, Information Society and Media Directorate General, Networked Enterprise & RFID Unit (D4). Prague

  4. Brady E, Bigham JP (2014) How companies engage customers around accessibility on social media. In: Proceedings of the 16th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers & accessibility—ASSETS ’14 (pp 51–58). ACM Press, New York, New York. doi:10.1145/2661334.2661355

  5. Caragliu A, Bo CDEL, Nijkamp P (2009) Smart cities in Europe, pp 45–59

  6. Chourabi H, Nam T, Walker S, Gil-Garcia JR, Mellouli S, Nahon K et al (2012) Understanding Smart Cities: an integrative framework. In: 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, pp 2289–2297. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2012.615

  7. Cook AM, Polgar JM (2014) Assistive technologies: principles and practice. Elsevier Health Sciences, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dakopoulos D, Bourbakis NG (2010) Wearable obstacle avoidance electronic travel aids for blind: a survey. Systems, man, and cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews. IEEE Trans 40(1):25–35

  9. Delahoz YS, Labrador MA (2014) Survey on fall detection and fall prevention using wearable and external sensors. Sensors 14(10):19806–19842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Domingo MC (2012) An overview of the Internet of Things for people with disabilities. J Netw Comput Appl 35(2):584–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fortino G, Gravina R (2015) Fall-MobileGuard: a smart real-time fall detection system. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Body Area Networks (BodyNets). Australia, Sydney, pp 44–50

  12. Gubbi J, Buyya R, Marusic S, Palaniswami M (2013) Internet of Things (IoT): a vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Gener Comput Syst 29(7):1645–1660. doi:10.1016/j.future.2013.01.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hersh M, Johnson M (2008) Assistive technology for vision-impaired and blind people

  14. Hoyle BS, Fowler JM, Waters DA, Withington DJ (2004) Development of the electronic guide cane for enhanced primary mobility for the vision impaired. In: Conference and Workshop on Assistive Technologies for Vision and Hearing Impairment

  15. Lau JC, Chiu CC (2003) Accessibility of low-income workers in Hong Kong. Cities 20(3):197–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lazar J, Dudley-Sponaugle A, Greenidge KD (2004) Improving web accessibility: a study of webmaster perceptions. Comput Human Behav 20(2):269–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Luo X, Liu J, Zhang D, Chang X (2016) A large-scale web QoS prediction scheme for the Industrial Internet of Things based on a kernel machine learning algorithm. Comput Netw 101(4):81–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McLaughlin ML, Hespanha JP, Sukhatme GS (2002) Touch in virtual environments. Prentice Hall, USA

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nandyala CS, Kim HK (2016) Green IoT Agriculture and Healthcare Application (GAHA). Int J Smart Home 10(4):289–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Oliveira A, Campolargo M (2015) From Smart Cities to Human Smart Cities. In: System Sciences (HICSS), 48th Hawaii International Conference on. IEEE, pp 2336–2344

  21. Ornstein SW, Ono R, Lopes ME, Monteiro RZ, Gill AA, Machry HS (2007) Health care architecture in Sao Paulo, Brazil: evaluating accessibility and fire safety in large hospitals. Int J Archit Res 1(1):13–25

    Google Scholar 

  22. Paniagua-Martin F, Garcia-Crespo A, Colomo-Palacios R, Ruiz-Mezcua B (2011) Semantic annotation architecture for accessible multimedia resources. IEEE MultiMedia 18(2):16–25

  23. Paredis CJJ, Bishop C, Bodner D, Cosgrave E, Arbuthnot K, Tryfonas T (2013) Living labs, innovation districts and information marketplaces: a systems approach for smart cities. Proc Comput Sci 16:668–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pasaogullari N, Doratli N (2004) Measuring accessibility and utilization of public spaces in Famagusta. Cities 21(3):225–232. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2004.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Perera C, Zaslavsky A, Christen P, Georgakopoulos D (2014) Sensing as a service model for smart cities supported by Internet of Things. Trans Emerg Telecommun Technol 25(1):81–93. doi:10.1002/ett.2704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ramirez ARG, Silva RFL, Cinelli MJ, Albornoz ADC (2012) Evaluation of electronic haptic device for blind and visually impaired people: a case study. J Med Biol Eng 32(6):423–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sanchez L, Galache JA, Gutierrez V, Hernandez JM, Bernat J, Gluhak A, Garcia T (2011) Smartsantander: the meeting point between future internet research and experimentation and the smart cities. In: Future Network & Mobile Summit (FutureNetw). IEEE, pp 1–8

  28. Shaikh FK, Zeadally S, Exposito E (2015) Enabling technologies for green Internet of Things. IEEE Syst J 99:1–12. doi:10.1109/JSYST.2015.2415194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Vereecken W, Van Heddeghem W, Deruyck M, Puype B, Lannoo B, Joseph W, Colle D, Martens L, Demeester P (2011) Power consumption in telecommunication networks: overview and reduction strategies. IEEE Commun Mag 49(6):62–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Walsh ST, Groen AJ, Lee JH, Phaal R, Lee S-H (2013) An integrated service-device-technology roadmap for smart city development. Technol Forecast Soc Change 80(2):286–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wiener WR, Welsh RL, Blasch BB Foundations of Orientation and Mobility. AMDs (adaptive mobility devices) 241:248–250

  32. Zhu X, Li Q, Chen G (2013) APT: accurate outdoor pedestrian tracking with smartphones. In: INFOCOM, 2013 Proceedings IEEE. IEEE, pp 2508–2516

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was granted by 84/2013 MCTI-SECIS/CNPq—Assistive Technology. It is also approved by the Ethical Committee in Human Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universidade do vale do Itajaí, Univali. Rua Uruguay 458, Centro, Itajaí, Brazil

    Alejandro R. García Ramirez, Gustavo Henrique Jasper & Amarilys Lima Lopez

  2. Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, AV. Universidad 30, Leganés, 28911, Madrid, Spain

    Israel González-Carrasco, Jose Luis Lopez-Cuadrado & Angel García-Crespo

Authors
  1. Alejandro R. García Ramirez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Israel González-Carrasco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gustavo Henrique Jasper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Amarilys Lima Lopez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jose Luis Lopez-Cuadrado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Angel García-Crespo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Israel González-Carrasco.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramirez, A.R.G., González-Carrasco, I., Jasper, G.H. et al. Towards Human Smart Cities: Internet of Things for sensory impaired individuals. Computing 99, 107–126 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-016-0529-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-016-0529-2

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Search

Navigation