Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A deep learning based framework for optimizing cloud consumer QoS-based service composition

  • Published:
Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The service composition problem in Cloud computing is formulated as a multiple criteria decision-making problem. Due to the extensive search space, Cloud service composition is addressed as an NP-hard problem. In addition, it is a long term based and economically driven. Building an accurate economic model for service composition has great attention to interest and importance for the Cloud consumer. A deep learning based service composition (DLSC) framework has been proposed in this paper. The proposed DLSC framework is considered an amalgamation between the deep learning long short term memory (LSTM) network and particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm. The LSTM network is applied to accurately predict the Cloud QoS provisioned values, and the output of LSTM network is fed to PSO algorithm to compose the best Cloud providers to contract with them for composing the needed services to minimize the consumer cost function. The proposed DLSC framework has been implemented using a real QoS dataset. According to the comparative results, it is found that the performance of the proposed framework outperforms the existing models with respect to the predictive accuracy and composition accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://github.com/SamarShabanCS/Math_for_ML/tree/master/time series data QoS.

References

  1. Motahari-Nezhad HR, Stephenson B, Singhal S (2009) Outsourcing business to cloud computing services: opportunities and challenges. IEEE Internet Comput 10:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yu Q, Liu X, Bouguettaya A, Medjahed B (2008) Deploying and managing web services: issues, solutions, and directions. VLDB J 17:537–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bittman TJ (2019) Hybrid clouds and hybrid IT: the next frontier. In: Gart. Inc. https://www.gartner.com/event/local-briefing/2544619. Accessed 1 Apr 2019

  4. Candan KS, Li W-S, Phan T, Zhou M (2011) At the frontiers of information and software as services. In: Agrawal D, Candan KS, Li WS (eds) New frontiers in information and software as services. Springer, Berlin, pp 283–300

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Sun L, Dong H, Hussain FK et al (2014) Cloud service selection: state-of-the-art and future research directions. J Netw Comput Appl 45:134–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zeng L, Benatallah B, Ngu AHH et al (2004) QoS-aware middleware for web services composition. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 30:311–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jaeger MC, Muhl G, Golze S (2005) QoS-aware composition of web services: a look at selection algorithms. In: IEEE international conference on web services (ICWS’05), IEEE

  8. Canfora G, Di Penta M, Esposito R, Villani ML (2005) An approach for QoS-aware service composition based on genetic algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 7th annual conference on genetic and evolutionary computation, ACM, pp 1069–1075

  9. Lewis PR, Faniyi F, Bahsoon R, Yao X (2013) Markets and clouds: adaptive and resilient computational resource allocation inspired by economics. In: Suri N, Cabri G (eds) Adaptive, dynamic, and resilient systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 285–318

    Google Scholar 

  10. Natis YV (2012) Gartner aPaaS report card: choose your cloud application platform wisely

  11. Ye Z, Bouguettaya A, Zhou X (2012) QoS-aware cloud service composition based on economic models. In: International conference on service-oriented computing, Springer, pp 111–126

  12. Haytamy SS, Kholidy HA, Omara FA (2018) ICSD: integrated cloud services dataset. In: Yang A et al (eds) Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics). Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ye Z, Mistry S, Bouguettaya A, Dong H (2016) Long-term QoS-aware cloud service composition using multivariate time series analysis. IEEE Trans Serv Comput 9:382–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zheng Z, Wu X, Zhang Y et al (2013) QoS ranking prediction for cloud services. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 24:1213–1222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pacheco-Sanchez S, Casale G, Scotney B et al (2011) Markovian workload characterization for QoS prediction in the cloud. In: 2011 IEEE 4th international conference on cloud computing, IEEE, pp 147–154

  16. Zhang Y, Zheng Z, Lyu MR (2011) WSPred: a time-aware personalized QoS prediction framework for web services. In: 2011 IEEE 22nd international symposium on software reliability engineering, IEEE, pp 210–219

  17. Zheng Z, Ma H, Lyu MR, King I (2013) Collaborative web service QoS prediction via neighborhood integrated matrix factorization. IEEE Trans Serv Comput 6:289–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li L, Rong M, Zhang G (2011) A web service QoS prediction approach based on multi-dimension QoS. In: 2011 6th international conference on computer science & education (ICCSE), IEEE, pp 1319–1322

  19. Zhang M, Liu X, Zhang R, Sun H (2012) A web service recommendation approach based on QoS prediction using fuzzy clustering. In: 2012 IEEE ninth international conference on services computing, IEEE, pp 138–145

  20. Ye Z, Bouguettaya A, Zhou X (2013) QoS-aware cloud service composition using time series. In: international conference on service-oriented computing, Springer, pp 9–22

  21. Papazoglou MP, Traverso P, Dustdar S, Leymann F (2007) Service-oriented computing: state of the art and research challenges. Computer (Long Beach Calif) 40:38–45

    Google Scholar 

  22. Liang Q, Wu X, Lau HC (2009) Optimizing service systems based on application-level QoS. IEEE Trans Serv Comput 2:108–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hayyolalam V, Kazem AAP (2018) A systematic literature review on QoS-aware service composition and selection in cloud environment. J Netw Comput Appl 110:52–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu B, Chi C-H, Chen Z et al (2009) Workflow-based resource allocation to optimize overall performance of composite services. Futur Gener Comput Syst 25:199–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Qu L, Wang Y, Orgun MA (2013) Cloud service selection based on the aggregation of user feedback and quantitative performance assessment. In: 2013 IEEE international conference on services computing, IEEE, pp 152–159

  26. Baumol WJ, Blinder AS (2011) Economics—principles and policy (paperback), 12th edn. South-Western College Publishing, Mason

    Google Scholar 

  27. D’Agostino D, Galizia A, Clematis A et al (2013) A QoS-aware broker for hybrid clouds. Computing 95:89–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Benouaret K, Benouaret I, Barhamgi M, Benslimane D (2018) Efficient top-k cloud services query processing using trust and QoS. In: International conference on database and expert systems applications, Springer, pp 203–217

  29. Amdouni S, Barhamgi M, Benslimane D et al (2014) Web services composition in the presence of uncertainty. In: International conference on conceptual modeling, Springer, pp 136–143

  30. Berkelaar M, Eikland K, Notebaert P (2004) LPSolve: open source (mixed-integer) linear programming system, version 5.0. 0.0. http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/lp_solve. Accessed May 2004

  31. Ye Z, Zhou X, Bouguettaya A (2011) Genetic algorithm based QoS-aware service compositions in cloud computing. In: International conference on database systems for advanced applications, Springer, pp 321–334

  32. Zhu J, He P, Zheng Z, Lyu MR (2014) Towards online, accurate, and scalable QoS prediction for runtime service adaptation. In: 2014 IEEE 34th international conference on distributed computing systems, IEEE, pp 318–327

  33. Liu S, Wei Y, Tang K et al (2015) QoS-aware long-term based service composition in cloud computing. In: 2015 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation (CEC), IEEE, pp 3362–3369

  34. Mistry S, Bouguettaya A, Dong H, Qin AK (2015) Predicting dynamic requests behavior in long-term IaaS service composition. In: 2015 IEEE international conference on web services, IEEE, pp 49–56

  35. Mistry S, Bouguettaya A, Dong H, Erradi A (2016) Qualitative economic model for long-term IaaS composition. In: International conference on service-oriented computing, Springer, pp 317–332

  36. Mistry S, Bouguettaya A, Dong H, Qin AK (2018) Metaheuristic optimization for long-term IaaS service composition. IEEE Trans Serv Comput 11:131–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Labbaci H, Medjahed B, Aklouf Y (2017) A deep learning approach for long term QoS-compliant service composition. In: International conference on service-oriented computing, Springer, pp 287–294

  38. Popoola A, Ahmad K (2006) Testing the suitability of wavelet preprocessing for TSK fuzzy models. In: 2006 IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems, IEEE, pp 1305–1309

  39. Ramsey JB (1999) The contribution of wavelets to the analysis of economic and financial data. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Eng Sci 357:2593–2606

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. Colah’s blog (2019) http://colah.github.io/posts/2015-08-Understanding-LSTMs/. Accessed 4 Mar 2019

  41. Del Valle Y, Venayagamoorthy GK, Mohagheghi S et al (2008) Particle swarm optimization: basic concepts, variants and applications in power systems. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 12:171–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Synthetic dataset (2019) https://github.com/TimeSynth/TimeSynth. Accessed 15 May 2019

  43. Jiang W, Lee D, Hu S (2012) Large-scale longitudinal analysis of soap-based and restful web services. In: 2012 IEEE 19th international conference on web services, IEEE, pp 218–225

  44. Manning C, Raghavan P, Schütze H (2010) Introduction to information retrieval. Nat Lang Eng 16:100–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ye Z, Bouguettaya A, Zhou X (2014) Economic model-driven cloud service composition. ACM Trans Internet Technol 14:20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Nourani V, Komasi M, Mano A (2009) A multivariate ANN-wavelet approach for rainfall–runoff modeling. Water Resour Manag 23:2877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Kim TY, Oh KJ, Kim C, Do JD (2004) Artificial neural networks for non-stationary time series. Neurocomputing 61:439–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt

    Samar Haytamy

  2. Department of Computer Science, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

    Fatma Omara

Authors
  1. Samar Haytamy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fatma Omara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samar Haytamy.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haytamy, S., Omara, F. A deep learning based framework for optimizing cloud consumer QoS-based service composition. Computing 102, 1117–1137 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-019-00784-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-019-00784-7

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Search

Navigation