Skip to main content
Log in

User-perceived quality of service in wireless data networks

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For so long, the term quality of service (QoS) has been a pursuit area for network engineers trying to dimension wireless networks to run in the most efficient way possible. Of late, there has been a trend reversal, looking at the user perceptions of the network performance to decide where dimensioning can have the greatest impact. This paper demonstrates the importance of defining the concept of user-perceived QoS and linking this to specific wireless data network parameters for some anticipated valuable applications. It has been shown that a quantitative rating can be obtained for a variety of important factors in the assessment of service quality, and mapped to specific values of multiple network parameters. We found QoS to be application-specific, where various applications require different levels of network performance to satisfy users. The role of physical location was also examined, investigating the influence of being indoors versus outdoors on the user perception of QoS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Davidor Y (2000) Winning the wireless war, Telephony, June

  2. Constantiou ID, Rodina EI, Polyzos GC (2002) Adverse selection in fourth generation networks: quality of services for entertainment. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Mobile Business, Athens, Greece

  3. Wu J (2000) Performance analysis of QoS-based voice/data CDMA systems. Wireless Personal Communications, 13:223–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lakelin P (2000) Internet service providers in Western Europe, http://www.isp-planet.com/business/lakelin-exec.html

  5. Varshney U (2004) Using wireless networks for enhanced monitoring of patients. Paper presented at the Tenth America’s Conference on Information Systems, New York

  6. Banitsas KA, Song YH, Owens TJ (2004) OFDM over IEEE 802.11b hardware for telemedical applications. Int J Mobile Commun 2(3):310–327

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chua S, Turner P (2004) Examining the utilisation of mobile handheld devices at an Australian aged care facility. Paper presented at the eighth Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Shanghai, China

  8. Kwok TC (1997) Residential broadband Internet services and applications requirements. IEEE Commun Mag, June, 76–83

  9. Mace S What is Quality of Service?

  10. http://www.winsock2.com/qos/intro.htm, 2000

  11. Caprihan G, Kumar S, Saran H, (1997) A QoS translation methodology based on user perception. IEEE Singapore International Conference on Networking, Singapore,

  12. Vogel A, Kerherve B, von Bochmann G, Gecsei J (1995) Distributed multimedia and QoS: a survey. IEEE Multimedia, 10–19

  13. Bouch A, Sasse MA, DeMeer H (2000) Of packets and people: a user-centered approach to quality of service. Conf Proc IWQoS’00, pp 189–197

  14. Barnes SJ, Liu K, Vidgen, RT (2001) Evaluating WAP news sites: the webqual/m approach. Paper presented at the European Conference on Information Systems, Bled, Slovenia

  15. Choi S-m, Lee E-k, Park M-c (2003) An empirical study on the determinants of repurchase intention in Korean mobile internet services. Paper presented at the International Telecommunications Society, Asia-Australasian Regional Conference, Perth, Australia

  16. ETSI (1990) Network Aspects (NA); general aspects of quality of service and network performance in digital networks, including ISDN (ETSI ETR 003 ed.1)

  17. Fluckiger F (1995) Understanding networked multimedia. Prentice Hall, USA

    Google Scholar 

  18. Coverdale P (1999) Multimedia wireless performance requirements. Internal Nortel report

  19. Ang PH, Nadarajan B (1997) Issues in the regulation of Internet Quality of Service, http://www.isoc.org/isoc/whatis/conferences/inet/97/proceedings/B1/B1_1.htm

  20. ITU The E-Model, a computational model for use in transmission planning”, ITU-T Recommendation G.107 (05/00)

  21. Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL (1988) SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. J Retailing. Volume 64(1):12–40

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kelley SW, Hoffman KD (1997) An investigation of positive affect, prosocial behaviours and service quality. Journal of Retailing, 73(3):407–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zeithaml VA, Parasuraman A, Berry LL (1990) Delivering Service Quality: Balancing Customer Perceptions and Expectations. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Naumann E, Jackson Jr.DW (1999) One more time: How do you satisfy customers? Business Horizons, 71–76

  25. Fitzpatrick P, Ivanovich M, Beresford M, Saliba A A hierarchical model for quality of service in wireless data networks, submitted

  26. Halsall F (1992) Data Communications, Computer Networks and Open Systems. 3rd edn, Addison Wesley, USA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Telstra for permission to publish this paper. The authors also acknowledge the valuable assistance of Jonathan Li in the phases of network build, verification and result graphing, and to Dr. John Fabre for his advice on the experimental design and assistance with testing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony J. Saliba.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saliba, A.J., Beresford, M.A., Ivanovich, M. et al. User-perceived quality of service in wireless data networks. Pers Ubiquit Comput 9, 413–422 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-005-0034-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-005-0034-7

Keywords

Navigation