Skip to main content
Log in

Swiping paper: the second hand, mundane artifacts, gesture and collaboration

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is widely recognised that paper remains a pervasive resource for collaboration and yet there has been uncertain progress in developing technologies that aim to enhance paper documents with computational capabilities. In this article, we discuss the design of a technology that interweaves developments in hardware and materials, electronics and software, and seeks to create new affinities between digital content and paper. The design of the technology drew from findings from naturalistic studies of the uses of paper, particularly when considering how ‘users’ might ‘interact’ with the augmented technology. We briefly review these studies and discuss the results of an evaluation of the emerging technology. Analysis of the fine details of the conduct of participants in these assessments suggest how, even when we design simple forms of interaction with a device, these can be shaped and transformed by the participation and collaboration of others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atkinson JM (2004) Lend me your ears: all you need to know about making speeches and presentations. Ebury Press, Vermillion

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bellotti V, Rogers Y (1997) From Web press to Web pressure: multimedia representations and multimedia publishing. Paper presented at the CHI ’97, Atlanta, Georgia

  3. Bi X, Moscovich T, Ramos G, Balakrishnan R, Hinckley K (2008). An exploration of pen rolling for pen-based interaction. Paper presented at the UIST ’08, Monterey, CA

  4. Buxton W, Myers BA (1986) A study in two-handed input. In: CHI ’86, Boston, Mass, pp 321–326

  5. Card SK, Moran T, Newell A (1983) The psychology of human–computer interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chatty S (1994) Issues and experience designing two-handed interaction. In: CHI ’94, Boston, MA, pp 253–254

  7. Cooper G, Bowers J (1995) Representing the user: notes on the disciplinary rhetoric human–computer interaction. In: Thomas P (ed) The social and interactional dimensions of human-computer interfaces. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 48–66

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gesell A (1925) The mental growth of the preschool child: a psychological outline of normal development from birth to sixth year, including a system of developmental diagnosis. Macmillan, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Gesell A, Halverson H, Thompson H, Ilg FL, Castner BM, Bates Ames L et al (1940) The first five years of life: a guide to the preschool child. Harper and Brothers, New York and London

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goodwin C (1981) Conversational organisation: interaction between speakers and hearers. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goodwin C, Goodwin MH (1996) Seeing as a situated activity: formulating planes. In: Engeström Y, Middleton D (eds) Cognition and communication at work. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 61–95

    Google Scholar 

  12. Guiard Y (1987) Asymmetric division of labor in human skilled bimanual action: the kinematic chain as a model. J Motor Behav 19:486–517

    Google Scholar 

  13. Harper RHR (1998) Inside the IMF: an ethnography of documents, technology and organisational action. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  14. Harper RHR, O’Hara K, Sellen A, Duthie D (1997) Towards the paperless hospital? A case study of document use by anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth 78:762–767

    Google Scholar 

  15. Harper RR, Hughes JA, Shapiro DZ (1989) The functionality of flight strips in ATC work: the report for the civil aviation authority. Lancaster Sociotechnics Group, Department of Sociology, Lancaster University

  16. Heath CC (1986) Body movement and speech in medical interaction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Hecht DL (1994) Embedded data glyphs technology for hardcopy digital documents. SPIE Color Hard Copy and Graphics Arts III(2171 (Feb)):341–352

  18. Hecht DL (2001) Printed embedded data graphical user interfaces. IEEE Comput 34(3):47–55

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kabbash P, MacKenzie IS, Buxton W (1993) Human performance using computer input devices in the preferred and non-preferred hands. In: InterCHI ’93, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp 474–481

  20. Leganchuck A, Zhau S, Buxton W (1998) Manual and cognitive benefits of two-handed input: an experimental study. ACM Trans Comput–Hum Interact 5(4):326–359

    Google Scholar 

  21. Luff P, Heath C, Norrie M, Signer B, Herdman P (2004, November 8–10) Only touching the surface: creating affinities between digital content and paper. Paper presented at the CSCW 2004, Chicago

  22. Luff P, Heath CC (1998, November 14–18) Mobility in collaboration. Paper presented at the CSCW ’98, Seattle, WA

  23. Luff P, Heath CC, Greatbatch D (1992) Tasks-in-interaction: paper and screen based documentation in collaborative activity. Paper presented at the CSCW ’92, Toronto, Canada

  24. Luyten K, Verpoorten K, Coninx K (2007) Ad-hoc co-located collaborative work with mobile devices. In: MobileHCI 2007, Singapore, pp. 507–514

  25. Mackay W, Velay G, Carter K, Ma C, Pagani D (1993) Augmenting reality: adding computational dimensions to paper. Commun Assoc Comput Mach 36(7):96–97

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mackay WE, Pothier G, Letondal C, Bøegh K, Sørensen H-E (2002) The missing link: augmenting biology laboratory notebooks. Paper presented at the UIST ’02, Paris

  27. Norrie MC, Signer B (2003, December). Switching over to paper: a new web channel. Paper presented at the WISE ’2003, Rome

  28. Perry M, O’Hara K, Sellen A, Brown B, Harper R (2001) Dealing with mobility: understanding access anytime, anywhere. ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact 8(4):323–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rønby Pedersen E, Sokoler T, Nelson L (2000) PaperButtons: expanding a tangible user interface. Paper presented at the symposium on designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, New York City, NY

  30. Schnettler B (2006) Orchestrating bullet lists and commentaries: a video performance analysis of computer supported presentations. In: Knoblauch H, Schnettler B, Raab J, Soeffner H-G (eds) Video-analysis: methodology and methods of qualitative audiovisual data analysis in sociology. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main, pp 155–169

    Google Scholar 

  31. Schnettler B, Knoblauch H (eds) (2007) Powerpoint-Präsentationen. Neue Formen der gesellschaftlichen Kommunikation von Wissen. UVK, Konstanz

  32. Sellen A, Harper RHR (2002) The myth of the paperless office. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  33. Signer B, Norrie M (2007) PaperPoint: a paper-based presentation and interactive paper prototyping tool. In: First international conference on tangible and embedded interaction, Baton Rouge

  34. Silberman S (2001, April) The hot new medium: paper—how the oldest interface in the book is redrawing the map of the networked world. Wired, pp 184–191

  35. Suchman L (1987) Plans and situated actions: the problem of human–machine communication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  36. Terrenghi L, Kirk D, Richter H, Krämer S, Hilliges O, Butz A (2008). Physical handles at the interactive surface: exploring tangibility and its benefits. In: AVI (Advanced Visual Interfaces) ’08, Napoli, Italy

  37. Tufte ER (2003) The cognitive style of Powerpoint: pitching out corrupts within. Graphics Press, Connecticut

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wellner P (1993) Interacting with paper on the DigitalDesk. Commun ACM 36(7):86–96

    Google Scholar 

  39. Winograd T, Flores F (1986) Understanding computers and cognition: a new foundation for design. Addison-Wesley, Norwood, NJ

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Woolgar S (1991) Configuring the user: the case of usability trials. In: Law J (ed) A sociology of monsters: essays on power, technology and domination. Routledge, London, pp 58–97

    Google Scholar 

  41. Yee K-P (2004) Two-handed interaction on a tablet display. In: CHI (Computer–Human Interaction) 2004, Vienna, pp 1493–1496

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work reported here was undertaken within the EU Funded Projects: Paper++ (IST-2000-26130), SuperInks (IST-2001-38770) and PaperWorks (IST-FP6-516895). Our thanks to colleagues on these projects, in particular David Frohlich, David Harrison, Lars-Olov Hennerdal, Moira Norrie, Anurak Sawatdee, Tommi Remonen, Rachel Murphy, Abi Sellen, Beat Signer, Ella Tallyn and Nadir Weibel. We are also grateful to the officers in the EU Commission, the participating organisations and associated institutions for all their help and support in undertaking the project, and the anonymous reviewers who provided very useful comments. We would also like to thank the participants in the experiments for their patience and assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Luff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Luff, P., Pitsch, K., Heath, C. et al. Swiping paper: the second hand, mundane artifacts, gesture and collaboration. Pers Ubiquit Comput 14, 287–299 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-009-0253-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-009-0253-4

Keywords

Navigation