Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The politics of representing cultures in ubiquitous media: challenging national cultural norms by studying a map with Indian and British users

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ubiquitous computing brings new parts of the world into contact with each other through digital devices. Consequently, it is important to understand what meaning is attached across contexts to particular interface choices, especially for the display of identity-related information. This understanding is made all the more critical when there are politically sensitive differences in status between areas (such as those implied by labelling one a “developing region”). This paper examines the politics of designing interfaces by looking at the situation of two producers in developing regions and relating this to the outcomes of studying a map metaphor with potential consumers from India and the UK. It does so in the context of exploring the representation of food production information as interactive user-generated content. Its findings challenge the popular notion of national cultural norms and suggest that an interface, which emphasises geography, can hide inter-continental similarities and intra-national variation and thus provide new support for stereotyping by region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A fascinating wikipedia entry on this quote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Map%E2%80%93territory_relation.

  2. Coffee has a middle-class urban association in southern India, particularly linked to coffee bars.

  3. In further studies, that stressed the timeline and a social network, processes and people were correspondingly more obvious and more commented upon.

  4. It makes even less sense to talk of the Indian consumers we interviewed in this way. Their lifestyle is highly westernized.

References

  1. Bannon L (1995) The politics of design: representing work. Communications of the ACM 38(9):66–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boyd D (2007) Viewing American class divisions through Facebook and MySpace. Apophenia blog essay, June 24 2007: http://www.danah.org/papers/essays/ClassDivisions.html

  3. Brown JS, Duguid P (1996) The social life of documents. First Monday, 1, 1996: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/466/387

  4. Butler JP (1990) Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chalermsripinyorat R (2004) Politics of representation. Crit Asian Stud 36(4):541–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Friedman B, Kahn PH Jr (2003) Human values, ethics, and design. In: Jacko JA, Sears A (eds) The human-computer interaction handbook. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp 1177–1201

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hall S (1997) Representation: cultural representations and signifying practices. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jones PH (2003) Analysis and representation of field research: activity patterns in intellectual collaboration CSCW 2 workshop on analyzing collaborative activity: representing field research for understanding collaboration: http://redesignresearch.com/cscw/jones-cscw02.pdf

  9. ITU Internet Reports 2005 (2005) The internet of things executive summary, http://www.itu.int/osg/spu/publications/internetofthings/InternetofThings_summary.pdf

  10. Le Dantec CA, Poole ES, Wyche SP (2009) Values as lived experience: evolving value sensitive design in support of value discovery. CHI ‘09, pp 1141–1150

  11. Light A (2009) Designing for other cultures: putting Hofstede to bed, Flow Interactive blog, 14th Jan 2009 http://www.thinkflowinteractive.com/2009/01/14/designing-for-other-cultures-putting-hofstede-to-bed/

  12. Light A (2006) Adding method to meaning: a technique for exploring peoples’ experience with digital products. Behav Inform Technol 25(2)

  13. Light A, Anderson T (2009) Research project as boundary object: negotiating the conceptual design of a tool for international development. Proc. ECSCW’09

  14. Light A (2010) Bridging global divides with tracking and tracing technology, IEEE Pervasive

  15. Light A, Kleine D, Vivent M (2010a) Performing Charlotte: a Tool to bridge cultures in participatory design. Int J Sociotechnol Knowl Dev, 1, 2

  16. Light A, Wakeman I, Robinson J, Basu A, Chalmers D (2010b) Chutney and relish: designing to augment the experience of shopping at a farmers’ Market, OzCHI’10

  17. Marsden G, Maunder A, Parker M (2008) People are people, but technology is not technology. Phil Trans R Soc A 366:3795–3804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Massey D (1994) Space, place and gender. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  19. Massey DB (2005) For space. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  20. McEwan C (2009) Postcolonialism and development. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  21. Miller D (2004) Social justice in multicultural societies. In: Van Parijs P (ed) Cultural diversity versus economic solidarity. Deboeck University Press, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  22. Oshlyansky L, Thimbleby H, Cairns P (2004) Breaking affordance: culture as context. Third Nordic ACM Conference on human-computer interaction, NordiChi, pp 81–84

  23. Oshlyansky L, Cairns P, Thimbleby H (2006) A cautionary tale: Hofstede’s VSM revisited. In: Fields B, Stockman T, Valgerour Nickerson L, Healey P (eds) Proceedings of HCI vol 2, pp 128–132

  24. Patnaik S, Brunskill E, Thies W (2009) Evaluating the accuracy of data collection on mobile phones: a study of forms, sms, and voice, Proc. ICTD 09, pp 74–84

  25. Pickens H, and others Comments on “Google Earth Raises Discrimination Issue In Japan” (2009) Slashdot: http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/05/24/184239

  26. Porter ME (1985) Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  27. Suchman L (1995) Making work visible. Communications of the ACM 38(9):56–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. von Hippel E (2005) Democratizing innovation, MIT Press, 2005: http://web.mit.edu/evhippel/www

  29. Young IM (2005) On female body experience: “throwing like a girl” and other essays. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  30. Robinson M, Bannon L (1991) Questioning representations.Proc. ECSCW’91

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK

    Ann Light

Authors
  1. Ann Light
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ann Light.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Light, A. The politics of representing cultures in ubiquitous media: challenging national cultural norms by studying a map with Indian and British users. Pers Ubiquit Comput 15, 585–596 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-010-0339-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-010-0339-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation