Skip to main content
Log in

Projector phone use: practices and social implications

Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Phones with integrated pico projectors are starting to be marketed as devices for business presentations and media viewing, and researchers are beginning to design projection-specific applications and interaction techniques to explore a broader array of possible uses. To begin to document how people use projector phones outside the laboratory, we present the results of a 4-week exploratory field study of naturalistic use of commodity projector phones. In our analysis, we consider how context, such as group size, relationships, and locale, influences projector phone use. A key observation is that users can readily exploit the new facilities of these devices to author interesting effects by employing representational techniques such as superimposition, scaling, translation, and motion. Thus, even the “basic” projector phone platform affords novel interaction modalities. Finally, we discuss the social implications of projector phone use for privacy and control, extrapolating from our observations to envision a future in which these devices are ubiquitous. With ubiquity, projector phone use may become problematic in public settings, motivating new rules of etiquette and perhaps laws, yet it may also engender new forms of creative expression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anoto AB, Digital Pen and Paper technology. http://www.anoto.com

  2. BBC News (2008) ‘Intrusion’ warning over mini projectors. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7265365.stm

  3. Beardsley P, Forlines C, Raskar R, van Baar J (2005) Handheld projectors for mixing physical and digital textures. In: Proceedings of CVPR. p 112

  4. von Bismarck J (2007/2008) Image fulgurator. http://www.juliusvonbismarck.com/fulgurator

  5. Blasko G, Coriand F, Feiner S (2005) Exploring interaction with a simulated wrist-worn projection display. In: Proceedings of Wearable computers, pp 2–9

  6. Cao X, Balakrishnan R (2006) Interacting with dynamically defined information spaces using a handheld projector and a pen. In: Proceedings of UIST, pp 225–234

  7. Cao X, Forlines C, Balakrishnan R (2007) Multi-user interaction using handheld projectors. In: Proceedings of UIST, pp 43–52

  8. Cowan L, Griswold WG, Hollan JD (2010) Applications of projector phones for social computing. In: Ubiprojection workshop at Pervasive

  9. Cowan L, Li K (2011) ShadowPuppets: supporting collocated interaction with mobile projector phones using hand shadows. In: Proceedings of CHI (in press)

  10. Cowan L, Weibel N, Pina L, Hollan JD, Griswold WG (2011) UbiSketch: bringing sketching out of the closet. Tech. Rep. CS2011-0962, University of California, San Diego, Computer Science Department

  11. Graffiti Research Lab: L.A.S.E.R. Tag. http://graffitiresearchlab.com/projects/laser-tag

  12. Greaves A, Åkerman P, Rukzio E, Cheverst K, Häkkilä J (2009) Exploring user reaction to personal projection when used in shared public places: a formative study. In: CAM3SN Workshop at MobileHCI

  13. Greaves A, Rukzio E (2008) Evaluation of picture browsing using a projector phone. In: Proceedings of MobileHCI, pp 351–354

  14. Greaves A, Rukzio E (2009) View & share: supporting copresent viewing and sharing of media using personal projection. In: Proceedings of MobileHCI, pp 1–4

  15. Harrison C, Tan D, Morris D (2010) Skinput: appropriating the body as an input surface. In: Proceedings of CHI, pp 453–462

  16. Ito M, Okabe D, Matsuda M (2006) Personal, portable, pedestrian: mobile phones in Japanese life. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kane SK, Avrahami D, Wobbrock JO, Harrison B, Rea AD, Philipose M, LaMarca A (2009) Bonfire: a nomadic system for hybrid laptop-tabletop interaction. In: Proceedings of UIST, pp 129–138

  18. Kindberg T, Spasojevic M, Fleck R, Sellen A (2005) The ubiquitous camera: an in-depth study of camera phone use. IEEE Pervasive Comput 42(2):42–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Löchtefeld M, Schöning J, Rohs M, Krüger A (2009) Marauders light: replacing the wand with a mobile camera projector unit. In: Proceedings of MUM, pp 19:1–19:4

  20. Luff P, Heath C (1998) Mobility in collaboration. In: Proceedings of CSCW, pp 305–314

  21. Pico Projectors By Application, Technology & Products Market (2010–2014). Technical Report SE 1221, http://marketsandmarkets.com (2010)

  22. Mistry P, Maes P, Chang L (2009) WUW- wear Ur world: a wearable gestural interface. In: Extended abstract. CHI, pp 4111–4116

  23. Pinhanez CS (2001) The everywhere displays projector: a device to create ubiquitous graphical interfaces. In: Proceedings of Ubicomp

  24. Plant S (2001) On the mobile: the effects of mobile telephones on social and individual life. Motorola Media Centre Industry—Technical Report

  25. Rapp S, Michelitsch G, Osen M, Williams J, Barbisch M, Bohan R, Valsan Z, Emele M (2004) Spotlight navigation: interaction with a handheld projection device. In: Proceedings of Pervasive, video paper, pp 397–400

  26. Raskar R, Baar J, Beardsley P, Willwacher T, Rao S, Forlines C (2003) iLamps. ACM Trans Graph 22(3):809–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Raskar R, Beardsley P, Van Baar J, Wang Y, Dietz P, Lee J, Leigh D, Willwacher T (2004) RFIG lamps: interacting with a self-describing world via photosensing wireless tags and projectors. ACM Trans Graph 23(3):406–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rose M (2010) Photonics spectra, future projections: cell phone market poised for projectors. Photonics Media, http://www.photonics.com/Article.aspx?AID=44177

  29. Scheible J, Ojala T (2009) MobiSpray: mobile phone as virtual spray can for painting BIG anytime anywhere on anything. Leonardo J Int Soc Arts Sci Technol 42(4):332–341

    Google Scholar 

  30. Song H, Grossman T, Fitzmaurice G, Guimbretière F, Khan A, Attar R, Kurtenbach G (2009) PenLight: combining a mobile projector and a digital pen for dynamic visual overlay. In: Proceedings of CHI, pp 143–152

  31. Song H, Guimbretière F, Grossman T, Fitzmaurice G (2010) MouseLight: bimanual interactions on digital paper using a pen and a spatially-aware mobile projector. In: Proceedings of CHI, pp 2451–2460

  32. Sugimoto M, Miyahara K, Inoue H, Tsunesada Y (2005) Hotaru: intuitive manipulation techniques for projected displays of mobile devices. In: Proceedings of INTERACT, pp 57–68

  33. Underkoffler J, Ullmer B, Ishii H (1999) Emancipated pixels: real-world graphics in the luminous room. In: Proceedings of CGIT, pp 385–392

  34. Weibel N, Cowan LG, Pina LR, Griswold WG, Hollan JD (2010) Enabling social interactions through real-time sketch-based Communication. In: Adjunct proceedings of UIST

  35. Wellner P (1993) Interacting with paper on the DigitalDesk. Commun ACM 36(7):87–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Willis KDD, Poupyrev I (2010) MotionBeam: designing for movement with handheld projectors. In: Ext. Abstr. CHI, pp 3253–3258

  37. Wilson ML, Robinson S, Craggs D, Brimble K, Jones M (2010) Pico-ing into the future of mobile projector phones. In: Ext. Abstr. CHI, pp 3997–4002

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Barry Brown for valuable feedback. This work has been funded by Microsoft Research ER&P, UC MICRO 07-067, and NSF Grant 0729013.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lisa G. Cowan or Nadir Weibel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cowan, L.G., Weibel, N., Griswold, W.G. et al. Projector phone use: practices and social implications. Pers Ubiquit Comput 16, 53–63 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0377-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0377-1

Keywords

Navigation