Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Informing and performing: investigating how mediated sociality becomes visible

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the human–computer interaction, computer supported cooperative work, and ubiquitous computing literature, making people’s presence and activities visible as a design approach has been extensively explored to enhance computer-mediated interactions and collaborations. This process has developed under the rubrics of “awareness,” “social translucence,” “social activity indicators,” “social navigation,” etc. Although the name and details vary, the central ideas are similar. By making social presence and activities more visible or perceivable, they provide social context for members to make sense of situations and guide their activities more informatively and appropriately. In this work, we introduce a class of visualizations called social context displays, which use and share graphical representations to depict people’s presence and activity information with an explicit focus on groups. The aim of this work is to examine social context displays in use and contribute new abstractions for understanding how making social information more visible works in general. Through our first-hand experience with user-centered design and empirical investigations of two social context displays in real settings, we uncovered not only how they provide social context to inform actions and decisions, but also how members perform and manage their self- and group-representations through the display. Drawing on Goffman’s performance framework, we provide a detailed description of how people react and respond to these two social context displays and reconsider some of the broader issues associated with computer-mediated interactions such as privacy, context, and media richness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bellotti V, Sellen A (1993) Design for privacy in ubiquitous computing environments. In: ECSCW’93: Proceedings of the third conference on European conference on computer-supported cooperative work. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, USA, 1993, pp 77–92

  2. Bentley E (1965) The life of the drama. Methuen, London

  3. Bly SA, Harrison SR, Irwin S (1993) Media spaces: bringing people together in a video, audio, and computing environment. Commun ACM 36(1):28–46

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boyd D (2002) Faceted id/entity: managing representation in a digital world. Master’s thesis

  5. Boyd D (2008) Why youth (heart) social network sites: the role of networked publics in teenage social life. In: Buckingham D (ed) Youth identity, and digital media. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 119–142

    Google Scholar 

  6. Binder J, Howes A, Sutcliffe A (2009) The problem of conflicting social spheres: effects of network structure on experienced tension in social network sites. In: Proceedings of the conference on human factors in computing. New York, USA, pp 965–974

  7. Churchill EF, Nelson L, Denoue L, Girgensohn A (2003) The plasma poster network: posting multimedia content in public places. In: Rauterberg M, Menozzi M, Wesson J (eds) INTERACT. IOS Press, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clement A (1996) Considering privacy in the development of multimedia communications. In: Kling R, (ed) Computerization and controversy: value conflicts and social choices. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 907–931

    Google Scholar 

  9. Coldefy F, Louis-dit Picard S (2007) Remote gesture visualization for efficient distant collaboration using collocated shared interfaces. In: IASTED-HCI’07: Proceedings of the second IASTED international conference on human computer interaction. ACTA Press, Anaheim, USA, 2007, pp 37–42

  10. Consolvo S, Smith IE, Matthews T, LaMarca A, Tabert J, Powledge P (2005) Location disclosure to social relations: why, when, & what people want to share. In: CHI ‘05: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM Press, New York, USA, pp 81–90

  11. De Certeau MD (2002) The practice of everyday life. University of California Press, California. http://www.amazon.com/Practice-Everyday-Life-Michel-Certeau/dp/0520236998

  12. Dourish P, Anderson K (2006) Collective information practice: exploring privacy and security as social and cultural phenomena. Hum.-Comput Interact 21(3):319–342

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dourish P, Bly S (1992) Portholes: supporting awareness in a distributed workgroup. In: CHI ’92: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 541–547

  14. Erickson T (2003) Designing visualizations of social activity: six claims. In: CHI ‘03 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, USA, pp 846–847. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=766027

  15. Erickson T, Kellogg WA (2000) Social translucence: an approach to designing systems that support social processes. ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact 7(1):59–83

    Google Scholar 

  16. Erickson T, Kellogg WA (2004) Social proxy. In: Bainbridge WS (ed) The encyclopedia of human-computer interaction. Berkshire Publishing Group, Berkshire. http://www.amazon.com/Berkshire-Encyclopedia-Human-Computer-Interaction-Set/dp/0974309125/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1312824816&sr=1-2. ISBN-10 0974309125, ISBN-13 978-0974309125.

  17. Finn KE, Sellen A, Wilbur S, Finn K, Sellen AJ, Wilbur SB (eds) (1997) Video-mediated communication. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, University of Michigan. http://books.google.com/books/about/Video_mediated_communication.html?id=T35HAAAAMAAJ

  18. Gaver WW, Beaver J, Benford S (2003) Ambiguity as a resource for design. In: CHI ’03: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. New York, USA, pp 233–240

  19. Goffman E (1959) The presentation of self in everyday life. Anchor books, New York. http://www.amazon.com/Presentation-Self-Everyday-Life/dp/0385094027#reader_0385094027

  20. Greenberg S, Rounding M (2001) The notification collage: posting information to public and personal displays. In: CHI ’01: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. New York, USA, pp 514–521

  21. Grudin J (2001) Desituating action: digital representation of context. Hum-Comput Interact 16(2):269–286

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hall ET (1976) Beyond culture/Edward T Hall, 1st edn. Anchor Press, Garden City

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hancock JT, Toma C, Ellison N (2007) The truth about lying in online dating profiles. In: CHI ‘07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, New York, USA, pp 449–452

  24. Harrison S, Dourish P (1996) Re-place-ing space: the roles of place and space in collaborative systems. In: CSCW ‘96: Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. New York, USA, pp 67–76

  25. Höök K, Benyon D, Munro AJ, Diaper D, Sanger C (2003) Designing information spaces: the social navigation approach. Springer, London

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Huang EM, Mynatt ED (2003) Semi-public displays for small, co-located groups. In: CHI ‘03: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. New York, USA, pp 49–56

  27. Ladd J (1991) Computers and moral responsibility: a framework for an ethical analysis. In: Computerization and controversy. Academic Press, San Diego, USA, pp 664–675. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=117868.117917. ISBN 0-12-224356-0

  28. Lampinen A, Tamminen S, Oulasvirta A (2009) All my people right here, right now: management of group co-presence on a social networking site Proceedings of the conference on supporting group work. ACM, New York, pp 281–290

  29. Lederer S, Mankoff J, Dey AK (2003) Who wants to know what when? Privacy preference determinants in ubiquitous computing. In: CHI ‘03: extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. New York, USA, pp 724–725

  30. Mark G, Semaan B (2009) Expanding a country’s borders during war: the internet war diary. In: IWIC ‘09: Proceeding of the 2009 international workshop on Intercultural collaboration. New York, USA, pp 3–12

  31. McGrath JE (1984) Groups: interaction and performance. Prentice Hall College Div, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. http://www.amazon.com/gp/customer-media/product-gallery/0133657000/ref=cm_ciu_pdp_images_1?ie=UTF8&index=1

  32. Mead GH (1934) Mind, self and society. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mynatt ED, Rowan J, Craighill S, Jacobs A (2001) Digital family portraits: supporting peace of mind for extended family members. CHI‘01: In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM Press, New York, pp 333–340. doi:10.1145/365024.365126

  34. Patil S, Lai J (2005) Who gets to know what when: configuring privacy permissions in an awareness application. In: CHI ‘05: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. New York, USA, pp 101–110

  35. Patterson DJ, Ding X, Noack N (2006) Nomatic: Location by, for, and of crowds. In: Hazas M, Krumm J, Strang T (eds) LoCA, of Lecture notes in computer science, vol 3987. Springer, London, pp 186–203

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sengers P, Boehner K, David S, Kaye JJ (2005) Reflective design. In: CC ‘05: Proceedings of the 4th decennial conference on Critical computing. New York, USA, pp 49–58

  37. Shami NS, Ehrlich K, Gay G, Hancock JT (2009) Making Sense of strangers’ expertise from signals in digital artifacts. In: CHI ‘09: Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing system. New York, USA, pp 69–78

  38. Skeels MM, Grudin J (2009) When social networks cross boundaries: a case study of workplace use of Facebook and LinkedIn Proceedings of the conference on supporting group work. ACM, New York, pp 95–104

  39. Strong R, Gaver W (1996) Feather, scent, and shaker: supporting simple intimacy. In: Proceedings of CSCW ‘96, pp 29–30. http://cms.gold.ac.uk/media/16strong-gaver.feather.cscw96.pdf; http://www.mendeley.com/research/feather-scent-and-shaker-supporting-simple-intimacy-1/

  40. Tang JC, Minneman S (1991) Video whiteboard: video shadows to support remote collaboration. In: CHI ‘91: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. New York, USA, pp 315–322

  41. Turkle S (2011) Alone together: why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  42. Viégas FB, Smith M (2004) Newsgroup crowds and authorlines: visualizing the activity of individuals in conversational cyberspaces. In: HICSS ‘04: Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 37th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS’04)—Track 4. IEEE Computer, Washington, USA. Society, pp 1–10

  43. Voida A, Grinter RE, Ducheneaut N, Edwards WK, Newman MW (2005) Listening in: practices surrounding itunes music sharing. In: CHI ‘05: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. New York, USA, pp 191–200

  44. Yankelovich N, Walker W, Roberts P, Wessler M, Kaplan J, Provino J (2004) Meeting central: making distributed meetings more effective. In: CSCW ‘04: Proceedings of the 2004. ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM Press, New York, USA, pp 419–428

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is partially supported by funding from NSF grant IIS: 0713562.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Computer Science, Fudan University, 825 Zhangheng Road, Shanghai, 201203, People’s Republic China

    Xianghua Ding

  2. Department of Informatics, Donald Bren School of Information and Computer Sciences, University of California, 5084 Donald Bren Hall, Irvine, CA, 92697-3440, USA

    Xianghua Ding & Donald J. Patterson

  3. IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, PO Box 704, Yorktown Heights, NY, 10598, USA

    Thomas Erickson & Wendy A. Kellogg

Authors
  1. Xianghua Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas Erickson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wendy A. Kellogg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Donald J. Patterson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donald J. Patterson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ding, X., Erickson, T., Kellogg, W.A. et al. Informing and performing: investigating how mediated sociality becomes visible. Pers Ubiquit Comput 16, 1095–1117 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0443-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0443-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation