Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Methodology for materiality: interaction design research through a material lens

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increasingly, human–computer interaction (HCI) is acknowledging the material dimensions of our subject. In doing so, a wide repertoire of methods is currently being explored for conducting interaction design research through a material lens. These methods range from material studies and studies in material cultures to methods borrowed from craft, designerly approaches to interaction design, sketching in hardware approaches, and so on. While we acknowledge these important attempts to approach the material dimensions of interaction design, it should also be noted that there is a lack of more systematic studies of methods that are, can be, or have been applied within HCI and interaction design to specifically explore interaction design through a material lens. So, there is a need for a methodology that acts as a guideline to material-centered interaction design research. In this paper, we address this need. More specifically, this paper contributes to this current state by presenting a methodology for methodological explorations in material-centered interaction design research. The development of this proposed methodology takes a point of departure in the methods available and applied so far. With grounding in design theory, this paper organizes these methods into a four-dimensional structure to guide deliberate choices of methods in different phases of interaction design research projects—that is, it serves as a framework for research design. The organizing structure for the proposed methodology follows the simple dialectic tradition in design to work back and forth between details and wholeness, materials and textures. In this paper, we describe the four dimensions of our framework and how these can be useful to guide research design aimed at advancing our understanding of the material dimensions of HCI. We illustrate how the proposed structure can be practically useful—both in advancing our studies of interaction design through a material lens and show how it brings us back to the roots of our profession—that is, back to a focus on the materials, the fundamental components of any computational composition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bardzell J (2009) Interaction criticism and aesthetics.In: CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM

  2. Baskerville R (1991) Risk analysis as a source of professional knowledge. Comput Secur 10(8):749–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bean J, Rosner D (2012) Old hat: craft versus design? ACM interactions 19(1):86–88

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beyer H, Holtzblatt K (1997) Contextual design: defining customer-centered systems, 1st edn. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco

  5. Bertelsen O, Breinbjerg M, Pold S (2009) Emerging materiality: reflections on creative use of software in electronic music composition. Leonardo 42(3):197–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bødker S (2006) When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges. In: NordiCHI '06: Proceedings of the 4th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: changing roles

  7. Buchli V (2002) The material culture reader, Berg Publishers

  8. Buechley L, Perner-Wilson H (2012) Crafting technology: reimagining the processes, materials, and cultures of electronics, Trans Comput Hum Interact (TOCHI) 19(3):1–21

    Google Scholar 

  9. Callister W (2010) Materials Science and Engineering. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cockton G (2012) Refuser (centered design): moving on, moving out, moving up. ACM Interact 19:8–9. doi:10.1145/2377783.2377786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Carroll JM (ed) (2003) HCI models, theories, and frameworks toward a multidisciplinary science. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dant T (2004) Materiality and society. Open University Press, Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  13. Doering T (2011) Material-centered design and evaluation of tangible user interfaces. In: TEI '11: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction

  14. Fällman D (2011) The new good: exploring the potential of philosophy of technology to contribute to human-computer interaction. In: CHI '11: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM

  15. Gross S, Bardzell J, Bardzell S (2013) Structures, forms, and stuff—the materiality and medium of interaction, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Theme issue “Material interactions”, X(X)

  16. Hedeager L (2011) Iron age myth and materiality: an archaeology of Scandinavia AD 400-1000, Routledge

  17. Hicks D, Beaudry M (2010) The Oxford Handbook of Material Culture Studies. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hook K, Löwgren J (2012) Strong concepts: intermediate-level knowledge in interaction design research, ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact (TOCHI) 19(3):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ishii H, Lakatos D, Bonanni L, Labrune J-B (2012) Radical atoms: beyond tangible bits, toward transformable materials, interactions. ACM 19(1):38–51

    Google Scholar 

  20. Irny SI, Rose AA (2005) Designing a strategic information systems planning methodology for malaysian institutes of higher learning (isp-ipta). Issues in Information System VI(1):325

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jung H, Stolterman E (2012) Digital form and materiality: propositions for a new approach to interaction design research, NordiCHI '12, October 14–17, 2012

  22. Kaptelinin V, Nardi B (2006) Acting with technology: activity theory and interaction design. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kolko J (2011) Craftsmanship. ACM Interactions 18:78–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lim Y-K, Stolterman E, Tenenberg J (2008) The anatomy of prototypes: prototypes as filters, prototypes as manifestations of design ideas. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact 15(2):Article 7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Löwgren J, Stolterman E (2004) Thoughtful interaction design. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  26. Meskell L (2005) Archaeologies of materiality. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, USA

  27. Miller D (2005) Materiality (Politics, History, and Culture). Duke University Press, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  28. Miller D (2009) Stuff. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  29. Moussette C, Banks R (2011) Designing through making: exploring the simple haptic design space. In: TEI '11: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction, pp. 279–282, ACM

  30. Nelson H, Stolterman E (2003) The design way—intentional change in an unpredictable world. Educational Technology Publications, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nigel C (2010) Designerly Ways of Knowing. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nimkulrat N (2009) Material inspiration: the practice-led research of a craft artist. In: C&C '09: Proceeding of the seventh ACM conference on Creativity and cognition, ACM

  33. Nimkulrat N (2012) Hands-on intellect: integrating craft practice into design research. Int J Design 6(3):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  34. Orlikowski WJ (2010) The sociomateriality of organizational life: considering technology in management research. Camb J Econ 34:125–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Robles E, Wiberg M (2011) From materials to materiality. ACM Interact 18(1):32–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Robles E, Wiberg M (2010) Texturing the “material turn” in interaction design. In: Proceedings of TEI2011—international conference on tangible and embedded interaction, ACM Press, pp. 137–144

  37. Rogers Y (2004) New theoretical approaches for human-computer interaction. Annu Rev Inf Sci Technol 38:87–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rosner D (2012) The material practices of collaboration. In: Proceedings of CSCW’12

  39. Simon HA (1969) The sciences of the artificial. The MIT Press, Cambridge. MA

    Google Scholar 

  40. Schon DA (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic Books, NewYork

    Google Scholar 

  41. Stolterman E, Wiberg M (2010) Concept-driven interaction design research. Hum Comput Interact (HCI) 25(2):95–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sundström P, Taylor AS, Grufberg K, Wirström N, Belenguer JS, Lundén M (2011) Inspirational bits—towards a shared understanding of the digital material. CHI’11, May 7–11, Vancouver, BC

  43. Vallgårda A, Redström J (2007) Computational composites. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM Press, New York, pp 513–522

    Google Scholar 

  44. Vallgårda A, Sokoler T (2010) A material strategy: exploring material properties of computers. Int J Design [Online] 4:3

    Google Scholar 

  45. Vallgårda A (2013) Giving form to computational things—Developing a practice of interaction design, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Theme issue Material interactions, X(X)

  46. Watts A (2007) Does it matter?: Essays on man’s relation to materiality. Reprint edition, New World Library

    Google Scholar 

  47. Wiberg M (2012) Landscapes, long tails & digital materialities—implications for mobile HCI research. Int J Mobile Hum Comput Interact 4(1):45–62

    Google Scholar 

  48. Wiberg M, Robles E (2010) Computational compositions: aesthetics, materials, and interaction design. Int J Design 4(2):65–76

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wiberg M, Ishii H, Rosner D, Vallgårda A, Dourish P, Sundström P, Kerridge T, Rolston M (2012) Material interactions—from atoms and bits to entangled practices. In: Proceedings of CHI′12, New York, NY, USA, pp. 1147–1150

  50. Wiberg M, Ishii H, Rosner D, Vallgårda A, Dourish P, Sundström P, Kerridge T, Rolston M (2013) Materiality matters—experience materials, ACM Interact

  51. Wiberg M, Kaye J, Thomas P (2013) Material interactions, personal and ubiquitous computing, Theme issue Material interactions, X(X)

  52. Wiltse H, Stolterman E (2010) Architectures of interaction: an architectural perspective on digital experience. In: Proceedings of NordiCHI, pp. 821–824

  53. Woodward I (2007) Understanding material culture. Sage Publications Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Informatics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden

    Mikael Wiberg

Authors
  1. Mikael Wiberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikael Wiberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wiberg, M. Methodology for materiality: interaction design research through a material lens. Pers Ubiquit Comput 18, 625–636 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0686-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0686-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation