Skip to main content
Log in

Pervasive games field trials: recruitment of eligible participants through preliminary game phases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates a novel methodological approach in performing user evaluation trials for pervasive games. The evaluation process of a pervasive role-playing game, Barbarossa, is used as a case study. Barbarossa involves a preliminary and a main execution phase. The former is freely available to anyone and may be played anytime/anywhere requiring no organizational and orchestration investments from the investigators team. The latter defines three interdependent player roles acted by players who need to collaborate in a treasure hunting game to achieve a common game goal. The eligibility of players for participating in the main game phase derives from those ranked relatively high in the preparatory phase. Drawing on concepts of cultural theory, we design the preparatory phase as an affective environment out of which the potential evaluators will emerge. The main hypothesis investigated is that the execution of such cost-effective preparatory phases may serve as a means for recruiting highly qualified subjects for user trials on pervasive game research prototypes, thereby increasing the reliability and quality of evaluation results. This hypothesis has been validated through the user evaluation trials performed on both the Barbarossa game phases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The Android application files along with the full reports of Google Play about the traffic of The Conqueror and ManHunt (which is presented below) applications can be found at the official site of Barbarossa, www.BarbarossaRPG.com, in the APKs and Reports section.

  2. http://www.sunspotworld.com/.

  3. https://github.com/zxing/zxing.

  4. Following the end of the evaluation trials, ManHunt has been freely available for anyone to play and enjoyed more than 8000 downloads.

  5. https://developers.google.com/places/documentation/.

  6. https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/directions/.

  7. https://developer.yahoo.com/weather/.

  8. http://www.BarbarossaRPG.com.

References

  1. Bell M, Chalmers M, Barkhuus L, Hall M, Sherwood S, Tennent P, Brown B, Rowland D, Benford S, Capra M (2006) Interweaving mobile games with everyday life, In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 417–426

  2. Benford S, Crabtree A, Flintham M, Drozd A, Anastasi R, Paxton M, Tandavanitj N, Adams M, Row-Farr J (2006) Can you see me now? ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact (TOCHI) 13(1):100–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Benford S, Flintham M, Drozd A, Anastasi R, Rowland D, Tandavanitj N, Adams M, Row-Farr J, Oldroyd A, Sutton J (2004) Uncle roy all around you: implicating the city in a location-based performance. In: Proceedings of the advanced computer entertainment. ACE, pp 1–10

  4. Bezerra C, Andrade R, Santos RM, Abed M, de Oliveira KM, Monteiro JM, Santos I, Ezzedine H (2014) Challenges for usability testing in ubiquitous systems. In: Proceedings of the 26th conference on l’Interaction homme-machine. ACM, New York, pp 183–188

  5. H Bial, S Brady (2007) The performance studies reader. Routledge, London

  6. Brown B, Reeves S, Sherwood S (2011) Into the wild: challenges and opportunities for field trial methods. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 1657–1666

  7. Bryan S (2013) The gamer tribes: an ethnography. A with Honors Projects, Parkland College. http://spark.parkland.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1097&context=ah

  8. Chen L, Chen G, Benford S (2013) Your way your missions: a location-aware pervasive game exploiting the routes of players. Int J Human Comput Interact 29:110–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheok AD, Khoo ET (2006) Age invaders: inter-generational mixed reality family game. Int J Virtual Real 5:45–50

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cheok AD, Sreekumar A, Lei C, Thang LM (2006) Capture the flag: mixed-reality social gaming with smart phones. IEEE Pervasive Comput 5:62–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Davies N (2005) Proof-of-concept demonstrators and other evils of application-led research: a position statement. Ubicomp

  12. e Silva ADS, Hjorth L (2009) Playful urban spaces a historical approach to mobile games, Simul Gaming 40:602–625

  13. e Silva ADS, Sutko DM (2009) Digital cityscapes: merging digital and urban playspaces, Peter Lang

  14. Eason KD (1984) Towards the experimental study of usability. Behav Inf Technol 3:133–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ekman U (2011) Issue on ubiquity. Fibreculture J 19

  16. Fischer J, Lindt I, Stenros J (2006) Final crossmedia report (part II)—epidemic menace II evaluation report, integrated project on pervasive gaming

  17. Fritsch J, Markussen T (2012) Issue on exploring affective interactions. Fibreculture J 21

  18. Guo B, Fujimura R, Zhang D, Imai M (2012) Design-in-play: improving the variability of indoor pervasive games. Multimedia Tools Appl 59:259–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hannamari S, Kuittinen J, Montola M (2007) Insectopia evaluation report, integrated project on pervasive gaming

  20. Herbst I, Braun A-K, McCall R, Broll W (2008) TimeWarp: interactive time travel with a mobile mixed reality game. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on human computer interaction with mobile devices and services. ACM, New York, pp 240–242

  21. Jones M, Marsden G (2006) Mobile interaction design. Wiley, New Jersey

  22. Kasapakis V, Gavalas D, Bubaris N (2013) Pervasive games research: a design aspects-based state of the art report. In: Proceedings of the 17th panhellenic conference on informatics. ACM, Thessaloniki, Greece, pp 152–157

  23. Kirman B, Linehan C, Lawson S (2012) Blowtooth: a provocative pervasive game for smuggling virtual drugs through real airport security. Pers Ubiquit Comput 16:767–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kjeldskov J, Skov M, Als B, Høegh R (2004) Is it worth the hassle? Exploring the added value of evaluating the usability of context-aware mobile systems in the field. In: Brewster S, Dunlop M (eds) Mobile human–computer interaction—MobileHCI 2004. Springer, Berlin, pp 61–73

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Rogers Y, Connelly K, Tedesco L, Hazlewood W, Kurtz A, Hall R, Hursey J, Toscos T (2007) Why it’s worth the hassle: the value of in-situ studies when designing ubicomp. In: Krumm J, Abowd G, Seneviratne A, Strang T (eds) UbiComp 2007: ubiquitous computing. Springer, Berlin, pp 336–353

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Saarenpää H (2008) Data gathering methods for evaluating playability of pervasive mobile games. Master thesis, University of Tampere

  27. Stenros J, Waern A, Montola M (2011) Studying the elusive experience in pervasive games. Simul Gaming 13:339–355

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wang AI, Guo H, Zhu M, Akselsen AS, Kristiansen K (2010) Survey on attitude towards pervasive games. In: Games innovations conference (ICE–GIC), 2010 international IEEE consumer electronics society’s, IEEE, pp 1–8

  29. Zender R, Metzler R, Lucke U (2014) FreshUP—a pervasive educational game for freshmen. Pervasive Mobile Comput 14:47–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Damianos Gavalas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kasapakis, V., Gavalas, D. & Bubaris, N. Pervasive games field trials: recruitment of eligible participants through preliminary game phases. Pers Ubiquit Comput 19, 523–536 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-015-0846-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-015-0846-z

Keywords

Navigation