Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Modeling value of time for trip chains using sigmoid utility

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of modeling and simulation aids in deriving many decisions related to transportation planning and traffic operations. Representing the real systems via simulation allows exploring system behavior in an articulated way, which is often impossible in the real world. In this paper, a simulation-based framework is presented to evaluate the impact of congestion charging on daily activity plans of the individuals. Personal decision to accept the congestion charges is evaluated by comparing the value of time with congestion charge. Value of time varies throughout the day depending upon the time pressure at any moment exerted by preceding and succeeding activities. Time pressure during an activity increases if available time for that activity is insufficient to attain the perceived utility. Daily activities in the schedules are modeled using bell-shaped marginal utility that results in sigmoid utility. A model is presented which derives the activity-specific parameters of the marginal utility function for the specific individual. To examine value of time of each person, the congestion charging is applied where personal willingness-to-pay is determined by comparing the ratios of cost to utility for original and adapted schedules. A large-scaled microsimulation of the modeled framework is used to simulate the whole population, which is created by FEATHERS, an operational activity-based model for Flanders, Belgium. The results of the simulation show that the number of individuals who avoid the congestion charges by adapting their schedules is almost three times the number of those who agree to pay it. The proposed framework can be useful to evaluate the tradeoff between value of time and costs where flexibility in selection of time defines the variability in cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hussain I et al (2016) Organizational-based model and agent-based simulation for long-term carpooling. Futur Gener Comput Syst 64:125–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pel AJ, Bliemer MCJ, Hoogendoorn SP (2012) A review on travel behaviour modelling in dynamic traffic simulation models for evacuations. Transportation 39(1):97–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lützenberger M, Masuch N, Hirsch B, Ahrndt S, Heßler A, Albayrak S (2011) Strategic behavior in dynamic cities. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Summer Computer Simulation Conference, Vista, CA, pp. 194–201

  4. Rosswog S, Gawron C, Hasselberg S, Böning R, Wagner P (2001) Computational aspects in traffic simulation problems. Best Websim99 II Traffic Simul 17(5):659–665

    Google Scholar 

  5. Knapen L, Usman M, Yasar A-U-H, Bellemans T, Janssens D, Wets G (2013) Framework to evaluate rescheduling due to unexpected events in an activity-based model. Presented at the Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting, Washington, USA, p. 21p

  6. Recker W (1995) The household activity pattern problem: general formulation and solution. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 29(1):61–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gan LP, Recker W (2008) A mathematical programming formulation of the household activity rescheduling problem. Transp Res Part B Methodol 42(6):571–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nandam S (2012) A data collection framework for exploring the dynamic adaptation of activity-travel decisions. University of Wisconsin–Madison

  9. Claude Weis, Christoph Dobler, Kay W. Axhausen (2013) A stated adaptation approach to surveying activity scheduling decisions. In Transport survey methods: best practice for decision making, 0 vols., Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 569–590

  10. Van Bladel K, Bellemans T, Wets G, Arentze T, Timmermans H (2006) Fitting S-shaped activity utility functions based on stated-preference data. Presented at the 11th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Kyoto

  11. Ettema D, Ashiru O, Polak J (2004) Modeling timing and duration of activities and trips in response to road-pricing policies. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board, no. 1894, pp. 1–10

  12. Jenelius E, Mattsson L-G, Levinson D (2011) Traveler delay costs and value of time with trip chains, flexible activity scheduling and information. Transp Res Part B Methodol 45(5):789–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Joh C-H, Timmermans H, Arentze T (2006) Measuring and predicting adaptation behavior in multidimensional activity-travel patterns. Transportmetrica 2(2):153–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nagel K, Kickhofer B, Joubert JW, Heterogeneous tolls and values of time in multi-agent transport simulation. In ABMTRANS, pp. 762–768

  15. Kouwenhoven M et al (2014) New values of time and reliability in passenger transport in The Netherlands. Apprais Transp 47:37–49

    Google Scholar 

  16. Baqueri SFA, Ectors W, Ali MS, Knapen L, Janssens D, Yasar A-U-H (2016) Estimation of value of time for a congested network—a case study of the national highway, Karachi. 7th Int. Conf. Ambient Syst. Netw. Technol. ANT 2016 6th Int. Conf. Sustain. Energy Inf. Technol. SEIT-2016 Affil. Workshop, vol. 83, pp. 262–269

  17. Hess S, Bierlaire M, Polak JW (2005) Estimation of value of travel-time savings using mixed logit models. Posit Util Travel Util Travel 39(2–3):221–236

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fezzi C, Bateman IJ, Ferrini S (2014) Using revealed preferences to estimate the value of travel time to recreation sites. J Environ Econ Manag 67(1):58–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Meunier D, Quinet E (2015) Value of time estimations in cost benefit analysis: the French experience. Curr Pract Transp Apprais Methods Policies Models – 42nd Eur Transp Conf Sel Proc 8:62–71

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bellemans T, Kochan B, Janssens D, Wets G, Arentze T, Timmermans H (2010) Implementation framework and development trajectory of FEATHERS activity-based simulation platform. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board, no. Volume 2175 / 2010 Travel Forecasting 2010, Vol. 1, pp. 111–119

  21. Ettema D, Timmermans H (2003) Modelling departure time choice in the context of activity scheduling behavior. no. 1831, p. p 39–46

  22. Zhang X, Yang H, Huang H-J, Zhang HM (2005) Integrated scheduling of daily work activities and morning–evening commutes with bottleneck congestion. Transp Res Part Policy Pract 39(1):41–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Knapen L, Bellemans T, Usman M, Janssens D, Wets G (2014) Within day rescheduling microsimulation combined with macrosimulated traffic. Adv Comput Commun Their Impact Transp Sci Technol 45:99–118

    Google Scholar 

  24. Van Aerschot K (2014) Analyse van het verband tussen de beperkte interesse in carpoolen en de inflexibiliteit van agenda’s. Bachelor Verkeerskunde, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Transportation Research Institute (IMOB), University Hasselt, Diepenbeek, Belgium

    Muhammad Usman, Luk Knapen, Ansar-Ul-Haque Yasar, Tom Bellemans, Davy Janssens & Geert Wets

Authors
  1. Muhammad Usman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Luk Knapen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ansar-Ul-Haque Yasar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tom Bellemans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Davy Janssens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Geert Wets
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Usman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Usman, M., Knapen, L., Yasar, AUH. et al. Modeling value of time for trip chains using sigmoid utility. Pers Ubiquit Comput 21, 1041–1053 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-017-1030-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-017-1030-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation