Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Design and evaluation of a mobile smart home interactive system with elderly users in Brazil

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents a study concerning the evaluation of a smart home control system for elderly people with a sample of 10 users in a city in the interior of Brazil. The control system consisted of a prototype using a Web-based mobile application, developed considering requirements obtained from a previous study and recommendations from the literature. The test participants were over 60 years old and had basic experience in the use of smartphones and computers. Success rates in the execution of activities, difficulty levels in carrying out activities, satisfaction, motivation, and control feelings were analyzed. We noted that the application had a satisfactory acceptance level by the participants, showing good results with the tests applied. As main implications for the design, the study showed the importance of clearly identifying the users’ whereabouts in the house in the application, not hiding information under scrolling, using images and videos appropriately in help systems to avoid confusion, limiting the number of windows open to keep context, avoiding unclear interactive elements to favor direct affordances, and proximity on the screen to group rooms and appliances visually. The results from the study can contribute to improving interaction with smart home systems for elderly people, especially in countryside parts of developing countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Available in:https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BUU3EoazNyw0jAHgyTMMzcNIWmD0wfOG9bY4zeEw7cE

  2. Available in:https://docs.google.com/document/d/1d03QDiqCvQZvdwFIrtzVXRSj0jUMvx3lc-Umw96_LiY

  3. Available at:https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QFj2teDdMpMGF7ezjy2Z4sWWnCaGYYp77jW8xwM7Iac/edit?usp=sharing

  4. Available in:https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BUU3EoazNyw0jAHgyTMMzcNIWmD0wfOG9bY4zeEw7cE/edit?usp=sharing

  5. Available at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QFj2teDdMpMGF7ezjy2Z4sWWnCaGYYp77jW8xwM7Iac/edit?usp=sharing

References

  1. Almeida N, Silva S, Teixeira A, Ketsmur M, Guimarães D., Fonseca E (2018) Multimodal interaction for accessible smart homes. In: DSAI 2018: 8th International conference on software development and technologies for enhancing accessibility and fighting info-exclusion. ACM, p 8

  2. Bangor A, Kortum PT, Miller JT (2008) An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Int J Hum-Comput Int 24(6):574–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Blaschke CM, Freddolino PP, Mullen EE (2009) Ageing and technology: a review of the research literature. Br J Soc Work 39(4):641–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bradley MM, Lang PJ (1994) Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 25(1):49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brazilian Internet Steering Committee: ICT households 2015: survey on the use of information and communication technologies in Brazilian households. Brazilian Network Information Center (2016). https://www.cetic.br/media/docs/publicacoes/2/TIC_Dom_2015_LIVRO_ELETRONICO.pdf

  6. Brazilian Internet Steering Committee: ICT households 2017: survey on the use of information and communication technologies in Brazilian households. Brazilian Network Information Center (2018). https://www.cetic.br/media/docs/publicacoes/2/tic_dom_2017_livro_eletronico.pdf

  7. Brooke J, et al. (1996) Sus-a quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Evaluation in Industry 189(194):4–7

    Google Scholar 

  8. Buzzi M, Gennai F, Leporini B (2017) How blind people can manage a remote control system: a case study. In: International conference on smart objects and technologies for social good. Springer, Pisa, pp 71–81

  9. Buzzi M, Leporini B, Meattini C (2019) Design guidelines for web interfaces of home automation systems accessible via screen reader. J Web Eng 18(4):477–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheek P, Nikpour L, Nowlin HD (2005) Aging well with smart technology. Nursing Administration Quarterly 29(4):329–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Coughlin JF, D’Ambrosio LA, Reimer B, Pratt MR (2007) Older adult perceptions of smart home technologies: implications for research, policy & market innovations in healthcare. In: 29th Annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, 2007. EMBS 2007. IEEE, pp 1810–1815

  12. Dahmen J, Cook DJ, Wang X, Honglei W (2017) Smart secure homes: a survey of smart home technologies that sense, assess, and respond to security threats. Journal of Reliable Intelligent Environments, pp 1–16

  13. Duarte PAS, Barreto FM, Aguilar PAC, Boudy J, Andrade RMC, Viana W (2018) Aal platforms challenges in IoT era: a tertiary study. In: 2018 13th Annual Conference on System of Systems Engineering (SoSE). https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSOSE.2018.8428745, pp 106–113

  14. Einstein HIA (2016) Guide to medical conditions and symptoms: Arthrose. Available online at https://www.einstein.br/guia-doencas-sintomas/info/#133. Last accessed on 22 Nov 2019

  15. Gell NM, Rosenberg DE, Demiris G, LaCroix AZ, Patel KV (2013) Patterns of technology use among older adults with and without disabilities. Gerontologist 55(3):412–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hanson VL (2009) Age and web access: the next generation. In: Proceedings of the 2009 International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibililty (W4A). ACM, pp 7–15

  17. Hudson DL, Cohen ME (2003) The role of information technology in disease management. In: 4th International IEEE EMBS Special Topic Conference on Information Technology Applications in Biomedicine, 2003. IEEE, pp 62–65

  18. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE): Projection of the brazilian population 2018 (2018). Available online at https://www.ibge.gov.br/en/statistics/social/population/18176-population-projection.html, last accessed 1 November 2019

  19. International Standards Organization: ISO: Iso 9241–171: 2008. Ergonomics of human system interaction – Part 171: Guidance on software accessibility (2008)

  20. Jaeger PT, Xie B (2009) Developing online community accessibility guidelines for persons with disabilities and older adults. J Disabil Policy Stud 20(1):55–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kamin ST, Lang FR (2018) Internet use and cognitive functioning in late adulthood: longitudinal findings from the survey of health, ageing and retirement in europe (share). The Journals of Gerontology: Series B

  22. Kerr J, Rosenberg D, Frank L (2012) The role of the built environment in healthy aging: community design, physical activity, and health among older adults. J Plan Lit 27(1):43–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ketsmur M, Teixeira A, Almeida N, Silva S, Rodrigues M (2018) Conversational assistant for an accessible smart home: Proof-of-concept for portuguese. In: DSAI 2018: 8th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion. ACM, p 8

  24. Kurniawan S (2009) Age-related differences in the interface design process. In: The universal access handbook. CRC Press, pp 1–12

  25. Kurniawan S, Arch A, Smith SR (2019) Ageing and older adults. In: Web accessibility. Springer, pp 93–119

  26. Kurniawan S, Zaphiris P (2005) Research-derived web design guidelines for older people. In: Proceedings of the 7th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility. ACM, pp 129–135

  27. de Lara SMA, de Mattos Fortes RP, Russo CM, Freire AP (2016) A study on the acceptance of website interaction aids by older adults. Univ Access Inf Soc 15(3):445–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Leporini B, Buzzi M (2018) Home automation for an independent living: investigating the needs of visually impaired people. In: Proceedings of the Internet of Accessible Things, pp. 1–9

  29. Leung L (2014) Constructing an inclusive web design checklist for health-related sites for older adults with complex chronic disease. Ph.D. thesis, OCAD University

  30. Lewis JR, Sauro J (2018) Item benchmarks for the system usability scale. Journal of Usability Studies 13(3)

  31. Likert R (1932) A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology

  32. Martins AI, Queirós A., Rocha NP, Santos BS (2013) Usability evaluation: a systematic review of the literature (in portuguese). RISTI-Revista Ibé,rica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informaċão (11), 31–43

  33. National Institute on Aging and National Library of Medicine: Making your website senior friendly: a checklist (2002). Available online at www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/checklist.pdf, last accessed on 22 Nov 2019

  34. Nielsen J, Molich R (1990) Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, pp 249–256

  35. Oliveira L, Mitchell V, May A (2019) Smart home technology—comparing householder expectations at the point of installation with experiences 1 year later. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing

  36. Patsoule E, Koutsabasis P (2014) Redesigning websites for older adults: a case study. Behaviour & Information Technology 33(6):561–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Peek ST, Luijkx KG, Rijnaard MD, Nieboer ME, van der Voort CS, Aarts S, van Hoof J, Vrijhoef HJ, Wouters EJ (2016) Older adults’ reasons for using technology while aging in place. Gerontology 62(2):226–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Queirós A, Silva A, Alvarelhão J, Rocha NP, Teixeira A (2015) Usability, accessibility and ambient-assisted living: a systematic literature review. Univ Access Inf Soc 14(1):57–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sauro J (2011) A practical guide to the system usability scale: background, benchmarks & best practices. Measuring Usability, LLC Denver CO

  40. Shneiderman B (2010) Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Pearson Education, India

    Google Scholar 

  41. Silva T, Caravau H, Carvalho D (2018) Comparative usability study of an ITV interface for seniors. In: Proceedings of 8th international conference on software development and technologies for enhancing accessibility and fighting info-exclusion (DSAI’18). ACM, p 6

  42. Tsuchiya LD, de Bettio RW, Freire AP (2017) Evaluation of web applications to control intelligent homes with guidelines for elderly users (in portuguese). In: Proceedings of the XVI Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p. Paper 60

  43. Tsuchiya LD, de Bettio RW, Greghi JG, Freire AP (2018) A study on the needs of older adults for interactive smart home environments in brazil. In: Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Software Developmentand Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion (DSAI’18). ACM, p 8

  44. Tullis T, Albert W (2008) Measuring the user experience: collecting, analyzing and presenting usability metrics

  45. United Nations: World population prospects 2019: Highlights. Tech. Rep. ST/ESA/SER.A/423 Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division (2019)

  46. W3C: Web content accessibility guidelines (wcag) 2.1 (2018). Available online at https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/, last accessed on 22 November 2019

  47. Wagner N, Hassanein K, Head M (2010) Computer use by older adults: a multi-disciplinary review. Computers in Human Behavior 26(5):870–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank all participants in this survey for their valuable collaboration.

Funding

We received funding for funding the first author’s research scholarship from FAPEMIG, and funding for this project from CNPq and FAPESP. The third author was funded by CAPES.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, MG, Brazil

    Letícia Diniz Tsuchiya, Lucas Fiorini Braga, Otávio de Faria Oliveira, Raphael Winckler de Bettio, Juliana Galvani Greghi & André Pimenta Freire

Authors
  1. Letícia Diniz Tsuchiya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lucas Fiorini Braga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Otávio de Faria Oliveira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Raphael Winckler de Bettio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Juliana Galvani Greghi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. André Pimenta Freire
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to André Pimenta Freire.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsuchiya, L.D., Braga, L.F., de Faria Oliveira, O. et al. Design and evaluation of a mobile smart home interactive system with elderly users in Brazil. Pers Ubiquit Comput 25, 281–295 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-020-01408-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-020-01408-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation