Skip to main content
Log in

The EthnoMuse digital library: conceptual representation and annotation of ethnomusicological materials

  • Published:
International Journal on Digital Libraries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper presents two vital aspects of the EthnoMuse digital library. We first present the development of a flexible data model through FRBRoo and CIDOC CRM conceptualization of processes and relations in folk song and music realizations. The approach is novel in that it conceptualizes and integrates various folkloristic and ethnomusicological materials, and also standardizes the workflow of production and post-production processes related to recording and documenting of folk song and music. We also present how novel music information retrieval techniques were integrated into the library to provide support for annotation of its contents. Two case studies are presented: automatic segmentation and labeling of field recordings, and transcription of bell chiming recordings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. EthnoMuse: multimedia digital archive of Slovenian folk, music and folk dance culture. Slovenian Government Founded R&D Project (2006–2008)

  2. ICOM/CIDOC CRM Special Interest Group: Definition of the CIDOC conceptual reference model: version 5.0.1. ICS-FORTH, Heraklion, Greece (2009)

  3. International Working Group on FRBR and CIDOC CRM Harmonisation: FRBR object-oriented definition (draft version 1.0.1) (2010)

  4. Seadle M.: Project ethnography: an anthropological approach to assessing digital library services. Library Trends 49, 370–385 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Variations3: The Indiana University Digital Music Library. Retrieved from http://www.dlib.indiana.edu/projects/variations3/

  6. Casey M.A., Veltkamp R., Goto M., Leman M., Rhodes C., Slaney M.: Content-based music information retrieval: current directions and future challenges. Proc. IEEE 96(4), 668–696 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Typke, R., Wiering, F., Veltkamp, R.C.: A survey of music information retrieval systems. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, London, UK, pp. 153–160 (2005)

  8. van Kranenburg, P., Garbers, J., Volk, A., Wiering, F., Grijp, L., Veltkamp R.C.: Towards integration of MIR and folk song research. In: Proceedings of ISMIR, Vienna, Austria, pp. 505–508 (2007)

  9. Cornelis O., Lesaffre M., Moelants D., Leman M.: Access to ethnic music: advances and perspectives in content-based music information retrieval. Signal Process. 90, 1008–1031 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. van Kranenburg, P. Garbers, J., Volk, A., Wiering F., Veltkamp, R.C.: Musical models for folk-song melody alignment. In: Proceedings of ISMIR, Kobe, Japan, pp. 507–512 (2009)

  11. Moelants D., Cornelis O., Leman M., Gansemans J., De Caluwe R., De Tré G., Matthé T., Hallez A.: The problems and opportunities of content-based analysis and description of ethnic music. Int. J. Intang. Herit. 2, 57–68 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Van Kranenburg P., Garbers J., Volk A., Wiering F., Grijp L.P., Veltkamp R.C.: Collaboration perspectives for folk song research and music information retrieval: the indispensable role of computational musicology. J. Interdiscip. Music Stud. 4, 17–43 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nicolas Y.: Folklore requirements for bibliographic records: Oral traditions and FRBR. Cat. Class. Q. 39, 179–195 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Doerr M., Hunter J., Lagoze C.: Towards a core ontology for information integration. J. Digit. Inf. 4, 169 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Doerr, M.: The CIDOC conceptual reference module: an ontological approach to semantic interoperability of metadata. AI Magazine 24 (2003)

  16. Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds): Handbook on Ontologies. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. WITCHCRAFT - What Is Topical in Cultural Heritage: Content-based Retrieval Among Folksong Tunes (2010). Retrieved from http://www.cs.uu.nl/research/projects/witchcraft/

  18. The Dutch Song Database—Nederlandse Liederenbank (2010) Retrieved from http://www.liederenbank.nl/index.php?wc=true

  19. Dutch Songs on Line (2010) Retrieved from http://meertens.musipedia.org

  20. The Danish Folklore Archives—Dansk Folkemindesamling (2010) Retrieved from http://www.dafos.dk/

  21. Eerola, T., Toiviainen, P.: Digital archive of Finnish folk tunes. Computer Database, University of Jyvaskyla (2004)

  22. Toiviainen, P., Eerola, T.: Visualization in comparative music research. In: COMPSTAT 2006, Proceedings in Computational Statistics, pp. 209–219 (2006)

  23. Eerola, T., Toiviainen, P.: Mir in Matlab: The midi toolbox. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 22–27 (2004)

  24. Variations as a Testbed for the FRBR Conceptual Model (2010) Retrieved from http://www.dlib.indiana.edu/projects/vfrbr/

  25. Byrd, J., Charbonneau, G., Charbonneau, M., Courtney, A., Johnson, E., Leonard, K., Morrison, A., Mudge, S., O’Bryan, A., Opasik, S. et al.: A white paper on the future of cataloguing at Indiana University (2006). Retrieved from http://www.iub.edu/libtserv/pub/Future_of_Cataloging_White_Paper.pdf

  26. Riley, J., Mullin, C., Colvard, C., Berry, A.: Definition of a FRBR-Based Metadata Model for the Indiana University Variations3 Project. Phase 2: FRBR Group 2&3 Entities and FRAD (2008)

  27. Riley J., Mullin C., Hunter C.: Automatically batch loading metadata from MARC into a work-based metadata model for music. Cat. Class. Q. 47, 519–543 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Le Boeuf, P.: “... That struts and frets his hour upon the stage and then is heard no more.”: the elements that should be accounted for in a conceptual model for performing arts and the information relating to their archives. In: Workshop at the Centre de documentation de la musique contemporaine, Paris, France (2006)

  29. Schüller, D.: Methodik und technik der phonographischen Feldforschung. In: Deutsch, W., Walcher (eds.) Sommerakademie Volks-kultur, Volksliedwerk, Wien (1994)

  30. Stead, S., Strle, G.: CIDOC CRM and Folksong. In: Clark, J., Hagemeister, E. (eds.) Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Proceedings of the 34th Conference, pp. 445–449, Fargo, United States (2006)

  31. IFLA Study Group on the functional requirements for bibliographic records: functional requirements for bibliographic records: final report. K.G. Saur, Munich, Germany (1998)

  32. Antelman K., Lynema E., Pace A.K.: Toward a 21st century library catalog. Inf. Technol. Libr. 25, 128–139 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Feng L., Jeusfeld M.A., Hoppenbrouwers J.: Beyond information searching and browsing: acquiring knowledge from digital libraries. Inf. Proces. Manag. 41, 97–120 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mann T.: The changing nature of the catalog and its integration with other discovery tools. A Critical Review. J. Libr. Metadata 8, 169–197 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Matheson S., Davidson S.: The evolution of providing access to information: is the online catalog nearing extinction?. Legal Ref. Serv. Q. 26, 57–89 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Raimond, Y., Sandler, M. (2007) Using the semantic web for enhanced audio experiences. In: Audio Engineering Society Convention. New York, NY, USA

  37. Sibelius score annotation software (2010). Retrieved from http://www.sibelius.com

  38. Good, M., et al.: MusicXML: an internet-friendly format for sheet music. In: XML Conference Proceedings, Orlando, Florida (2001)

  39. Downie, J.S.: Evaluating a simple approach to music information retrieval: conceiving melodic n-grams as text, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Western Ontario (1999)

  40. Bohak, C., Marolt, M.: Calculating similarity of folk song variants with melody-based features. In: Proceedings of ISMIR, Kobe, Japan, pp. 597–601 (2009)

  41. Lilypond music notation software (2010). Retrieved from http://lilypond.org

  42. Pikrakis A., Giannakopoulos T., Theodoridis S.: A speech/music discriminator of radio recordings based on dynamic programming and bayesian networks. IEEE Trans. Multimed. 10, 846–857 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Scheirer, E., Slaney, M.: Construction and evaluation of a robust multifeature speech/music discriminator. In: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, pp. 1331–1334 (1997)

  44. Tzanetakis, G., Cook, P.: Multifeature audio segmentation for browsing and annotation. In: Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics, pp. 103–106 (1999)

  45. Marolt, M.: Probabilistic segmentation and labeling of ethnomusicological field recordings. In: Proceedings of ISMIR, Kobe Japan (2009)

  46. Kovačič M.: New contexts, esthetics, and transfer in bell-chiming tradition. Slovene Stud. 29, 19–34 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Klapuri, A., Davy, M. (eds): Signal Processing Methods for Music Transcription. Springer, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Marolt, M.: Non-negative matrix factorization with selective sparsity constraints for transcription of bell chiming recordings. In: Proceedings of Sound and Music Conference, Porto, Portugal (2009)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matija Marolt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Strle, G., Marolt, M. The EthnoMuse digital library: conceptual representation and annotation of ethnomusicological materials. Int J Digit Libr 12, 105–119 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-012-0086-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-012-0086-z

Keywords

Navigation