Skip to main content
Log in

Extension of a ground control interface for swarms of Small Drones

  • Special Feature: Original Article
  • Published:
Artificial Life and Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the technology for fully autonomous swarms of robots is rapidly progressing, the human operator will continue to play an important role during any swarming mission due to safety, monitoring and control constraints. In this paper, we present the set of features that a Ground Control Interface (GCI) must incorporate to allow monitoring, control and safety of outdoor missions with a swarm of Small Drones (drones of less than 1 kg). We propose a new extension to a widely used GCI by incorporating those features and we demonstrate its usage on a swarm of 10 Small Drones flying outdoor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Link: https://www.faa.gov/uas/nprm/.

  2. http://www.librepilot.org/.

  3. http://www.qt.io/developers/.

  4. http://qgroundcontrol.org/.

  5. https://pixhawk.ethz.ch/.

  6. http://qgroundcontrol.org/mavlink/start.

  7. http://planner2.ardupilot.com/.

  8. https://wiki.paparazziuav.org/wiki/GCS.

  9. http://qgroundcontrol.org/mavlink/start.

  10. http://youtu.be/AE0KQHYT2MI.

  11. https://youtu.be/wsiyYRFHrSg.

  12. https://github.com/ndousse/qgroundcontrol.git.

References

  1. Xu A et al (2011) Optimal complete terrain coverage using an unmanned aerial vehicle’. In: Robotics and automation (ICRA), 2011 IEEE international conference on, pp. 2513–2519

  2. Allred J et al. (2007) Sensorflock: an airborne wireless sensor network of micro-air vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, pp 117–129

  3. Penders J et al (2011) A robot swarm assisting a human fire-fighter. Adv Robot 25(1–2):93–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Olfati-Saber R (2007) Distributed tracking for mobile sensor networks with information-driven mobility. In: American Control Conference (ACC), pp 4606–4612

  5. Quintero S et al. (2013) Flocking with fixed-wing UAVs for distributed sensing: a stochastic optimal control approach. In: American Control Conference (ACC), pp 2025–2031

  6. Vásárhelyi G et al (2014) Outdoor flocking and formation flight with autonomous aerial robots. In: Intelligent robots and systems (IROS 2014), 2014 IEEE/RSJ international conference on, pp. 3866–3873

  7. Hauert S et al. (2011) Reynolds flocking in reality with fixed-wing robots: communication range vs. maximum turning rate. In: Intelligent robots and systems (IROS), 2011 IEEE/RSJ international conference on, pp. 5015–5020

  8. Ruff HA et al (2002) Human interaction with levels of automation and decision-aid fidelity in the supervisory control of multiple simulated unmanned air vehicles. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ 11(4):335–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dixon SR et al (2005) Mission control of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles: a workload analysis. Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergon Soc 47(3):479–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cummings ML et al (2007) Predicting operator capacity for supervisory control of multiple UAVs. In: Innovations in intelligent machines: studies in computational intelligence 70. Springer, New York, pp 11–37

  11. McLurkin J et al (2006) Speaking Swarmish: human-robot interface design for large swarms of autonomous mobile robots. In: AAAI spring symposium: to boldly go where no human-robot team has gone before, pp 72–75, 2006

  12. Kolling A et al. (2012) Towards human control of robot swarms. In: Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, ACM, pp. 89–96

  13. Vasile C et al (2011) Integrating human swarm interaction in a distributed robotic control system. In: Automation science and engineering (CASE), 2011 IEEE conference on, pp 743–748

  14. Bashyal S et al (2008) Human swarm interaction for radiation source search and localization. In: Swarm intelligence symposium, 2008. SIS 2008. IEEE

  15. Lewis M (2013) Human interaction with multiple remote robots. Rev Hum Factors Ergon 9(1):131–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J.L. Drury et al., “Awareness in unmanned aerial vehicle operations”, The International C2 Journal, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1–10, 2008

  17. International Civil Aviation Organization (2013) Safety management manual, 3rd edn. pp 1–2

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work in this paper was supported by the myCopter project funded by the European Commission under the 7th Framework Program (http://www.mycopter.eu) and by ArmaSuisse, competence sector Science + Technology for the Swiss Federal Department of Defense, Civil Protection and Sport. We would also like to acknowledge Meysam Basiri and Julien Lecoeur for their useful help in reviewing the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas Dousse.

Additional information

This work was presented in part at the 1st International Symposium on Swarm Behavior and Bio-Inspired Robotics, Kyoto, Japan, October 28–30, 2015.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dousse, N., Heitz, G. & Floreano, D. Extension of a ground control interface for swarms of Small Drones. Artif Life Robotics 21, 308–316 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-016-0302-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-016-0302-9

Keywords

Navigation