Skip to main content
Log in

The evolution of cooperation based on indirect reciprocity and spatial locality in continuous space

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Artificial Life and Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

How cooperation evolves despite its disadvantage to local selfishness has been a challenging theme for many years. Several mechanisms have been proposed, among which reputation-based indirect reciprocity and spatial locality are two of the majors. However, only a few studies about their interaction exist. Here, we considered an agent-based model in a two-dimensional continuous space where not only the game-based interaction but also the transmission of agents’ reputation take place based on the spatial locality. Agents have one of the following three strategies as their gene: always defect, always cooperate or discriminate based on the recipient’s reputation. We tested four assessment rules in indirect reciprocity: Shunning, Stern Judging, Image Scoring and Simple Standing. We found that without mobility, first, as the spatial locality gets weaker, the cooperation rate drops. Second, for cooperation to evolve from an all-defector environment, the cluster of discriminators is necessary. We added mobility so that an agent will get closer to the one who donated to her and far away from the one who defected against her. We found that if the movement duration is long enough, a higher cooperation rate could be promoted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Evolution of gene.

References

  1. Alexander RD (1987) The biology of moral systems. Transaction Publishers, Piscataway

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allen B, Lippner G, Chen YT, Fotouhi B, Momeni N, Yau ST, Nowak MA (2017) Evolutionary dynamics on any population structure. Nature 544(7649):227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fu F, Hauert C, Nowak MA, Wang L (2008) Reputation-based partner choice promotes cooperation in social networks. Phys Rev E 78(2):026117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. ii. J Theor Biol 7(1):17–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hilbe C, Nowak MA, Sigmund K (2013) Evolution of extortion in iterated prisoner’s dilemma games. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(17):6913–6918

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Lieberman E, Hauert C, Nowak MA (2005) Evolutionary dynamics on graphs. Nature 433(7023):312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nowak MA, May RM (1992) Evolutionary games and spatial chaos. Nature 359(6398):826–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nowak MA, Sigmund K (1998) Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature 393(6685):573–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ohtsuki H, Hauert C, Lieberman E, Nowak MA (2006) A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks. Nature 441(7092):502–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ohtsuki H, Iwasa Y (2006) The leading eight: social norms that can maintain cooperation by indirect reciprocity. J Theor Biol 239(4):435–444

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Pacheco JM, Santos FC, Chalub FAC (2006) Stern-judging: a simple, successful norm which promotes cooperation under indirect reciprocity. PLoS Comput Biol 2(12):e178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Robert S (1986) The economics of rights. co-operation and welfare,

  13. Sasaki T, Yamamoto H, Okada I, Uchida S (2017) The evolution of reputation-based cooperation in regular networks. Games 8(1):8

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Szabó G, Tőke C (1998) Evolutionary prisoner’s dilemma game on a square lattice. Phys Rev E 58(1):69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Takahashi N, Mashima R (2006) The importance of subjectivity in perceptual errors on the emergence of indirect reciprocity. J Theor Biol 243(3):418–436

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Traulsen A, Nowak MA (2006) Evolution of cooperation by multilevel selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103(29):10952–10955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Trivers RL (1971) The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quart Rev Biol 46(1):35–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang C, Wang L, Wang J, Sun S, Xia C (2017) Inferring the reputation enhances the cooperation in the public goods game on interdependent lattices. Appl Math Comput 293:18–29

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang Z, Kokubo S, Tanimoto J, Fukuda E, Shigaki K (2013) Insight into the so-called spatial reciprocity. Phys Rev E 88(4):042145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang Z, Wang L, Yin ZY, Xia CY (2012) Inferring reputation promotes the evolution of cooperation in spatial social dilemma games. PLoS One 7(7), e40,218

  21. West SA, El Mouden C, Gardner A (2011) Sixteen common misconceptions about the evolution of cooperation in humans. Evol Hum Behav 32(4):231–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by JSPS/MEXT KAKENHI: JP17H06383 in #4903.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huanxin Chen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This work was presented in part at the 24th International Symposium on Artificial Life and Robotics, Beppu, Oita, January 23–25, 2019.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, H., Suzuki, R. & Arita, T. The evolution of cooperation based on indirect reciprocity and spatial locality in continuous space. Artif Life Robotics 25, 407–418 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-020-00589-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-020-00589-4

Keywords

Navigation