Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Complete classification of raw LIDAR data and 3D reconstruction of buildings

  • Theoretical Advances
  • Published:
Pattern Analysis and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

LIDAR (LIght Detection And Ranging) data are a primary data source for digital terrain model (DTM) generation and 3D city models. This paper presents a three-stage framework for a robust automatic classification of raw LIDAR data as buildings, ground and vegetation, followed by a reconstruction of 3D models of the buildings. In the first stage the raw data are filtered and interpolated over a grid. In the second stage, first a double raw data segmentation is performed and then geometric and topological relationships among regions resulting from segmentation are computed and stored in a knowledge base. In the third stage, a rule-based scheme is applied for the classification of the regions. Finally, polyhedral building models are reconstructed by analysing the topology of building outlines, building roof slopes and eaves lines. Results obtained on data sets with different ground point density, gathered over the town of Pavia (Italy) with Toposys and Optech airborne laser scanning systems, are shown to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weibel R, Heller M (1991) Digital terrain modelling. In: Maguire DJ et al (eds) Geographical information systems—principles and applications. Longman, London, pp 269–297

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shiode N (2001) 3D urban models: recent developments in the digital modelling of urban environment in three-dimensions. GeoJournal 52(3):263–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baltsavias EP (1999) Airborne laser scanning: existing systems and firms and other resources. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 54:164–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ledermann W (1980) Kalman filtering. Handbook of applicable mathematics, statistics, vol IV. Emlyn Lloyd, New York

  5. Kilian J, Haala N, Englich M (1996) Capture and evaluation of airborne laser scanner data. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 31(3):383–388

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vosselman G, Maas H-G (2001) Adjustment and filtering of raw laser altimetry data. OEEPE Official Publ 40:62–72

    Google Scholar 

  7. Burman H (2002) Laser strip adjustment for data calibration and verification. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 34(3A):67–72

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Noronha S, Nevatia R (2001) Detection and modeling of buildings from multiple aerial images. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 23(5):501–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kraus K, Pfeifer N (1998) Determination of terrain models in wooded areas with airborne laser scanner data. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 53(4):193–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rottensteiner F, Briese C (2002) A new method for building extraction in urban areas from high-resolution LIDAR data. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 34(3A):295–301

    Google Scholar 

  11. Axelsson P (2000) DEM generation form laser scanner data using adaptive TIN models. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 33(B4/1):110–117

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brovelli MA, Cannata M, Longoni UM (2002) Managing and processing LIDAR data within GRASS. http://www.ing.unitn.it/~grass/conferences/GRASS2002/proceedings/proceedings/papers_by_author.html (accessed 4 April 2004). Also in Proceedings of open source GIS—GRASS user’s conference, Trento, Italy

  13. Filin S (2002) Surface clustering from airborne laser scanning data. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 34(3A):119–124

    Google Scholar 

  14. Roggero M (2002) Object segmentation with region growing and principal component analysis. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 34(3A):289–294

    Google Scholar 

  15. Foerstner W (1999) 3D-city models: automatic and semiautomatic acquisition methods. In: Fritsch D, Spiller R (eds) Photogrammetric week ‘99. Wichmann Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 291–303

    Google Scholar 

  16. Guelch E, Mueller H, Läbe T (1999) Integration of automatic processes into semi-automatic building extraction. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 32(3-2W5):177–186

    Google Scholar 

  17. Guelch E (2000) Digital systems for automated cartographic feature extraction. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 33(B29):241–256

    Google Scholar 

  18. Haala N, Brenner C (1997) Interpretation of urban surface models using 2D building information. In: Gruen A, Baltsavias E, Henricsson O (eds) Automatic extraction of man-made objects from aerial and space images (II). Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, pp 213–222

    Google Scholar 

  19. Haala N (1999) Combining multiple data sources for urban data acquisition. In: Fritsch D, Spiller R (eds) Photogrammetric week ‘99. Wichmann Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 329–339

    Google Scholar 

  20. Brenner C (2000) Towards fully automatic generation of city models. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 33(3):85–92

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fischler MA, Bolles RC (1981) Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Commun ACM 24(6):381–395

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Weidner U, Foerstner W (1995) Towards automatic building extraction from high resolution digital elevation models. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 50(4):38–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Weidner U (1997) Digital surface models for building extraction. In: Gruen A, Baltsavias E, Henricsson O (eds) Automatic extraction of man-made objects from aerial and space images (II). Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, pp 193–202

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hoover A, Jean-Baptiste G, Jiang X, Flynn PJ, Bunke H, Goldgof DB, Bowyer K, Eggert DW, Fitzgibbon A, Fisher RB (1996) An experimental comparison of range image segmentation algorithms. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 18(7):673–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. ISPRS (2003) ISPRS test on extracting DEMs from point clouds: a comparison of existing automatic filters. http://www.enterprise.lr.tudelft.nl/frs/isprs/filtertest/ (accessed 4 April 2005)

  26. Nardinocchi C, Forlani G (2001) Detection and segmentation of building roofs from Lidar data. In: Proceedings of ISPRS workshop on 3D digital imaging and modelling applications of heritage, industries, medicine & commercial land, Padua, Italy

  27. http://www.toposys.com/ (accessed 4 April 2005)

  28. http://www.optech.ca/ (accessed 4 April 2005)

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been partly financed under the Italian national research project COFIN no. 9808229941_002.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gianfranco Forlani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Forlani, G., Nardinocchi, C., Scaioni, M. et al. Complete classification of raw LIDAR data and 3D reconstruction of buildings. Pattern Anal Applic 8, 357–374 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10044-005-0018-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10044-005-0018-2

Keywords

Navigation