Skip to main content
Log in

Intuitionistic fuzzy similarity measures based on min–max operators

  • Theoretical Advances
  • Published:
Pattern Analysis and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, introduced by Atanassov, offer a new possibility to describe in a more adequate way many real problems. An important tool for determining the degree of similarity between two objects is represented by similarity measures. Different types of similarity measures for intuitionistic fuzzy sets were proposed and used in various applications. More existing similarity measures involve little or no the hesitancy degree in intuitionistic fuzzy sets. The capacity of a similarity measure is determined by the form of expression and the information contained therein; more information used implies a greater power to distinguish. In this paper, we propose a family of intuitionistic fuzzy similarity measures that contain the hesitancy degree in their expression. This family represents a generalization of some known measures. For particular values of parameters, various similarity measures can be obtained: some of them are known but others are new, as will be shown in sections “The proposed intuitionistic fuzzy similarity measures” and “Conclusion”. In order to evaluate the performance of these measures, our experimental study is oriented in two basic directions: one shows how much are reasonable the proposed measures, and other describes the possibilities of application in solving some real-world problems. The experiments prove that our measures give the same results as the measures used as comparison.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atanassov K (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20(1):87–96

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Atanassov K (1989) More or intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 33(1):37–46

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Atanassov K (1994) New operations defined over the intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 61(2):137–142

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy Sets. Inf Control 8:338–356

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Li DF (2005) Multiattribute decision making models and methods using intuitionistic fuzzy sets. J Comput Syst Sci 70:73–85

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu HW, Wang GJ (2007) Multi-criteria decision-making methods based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Eur J Oper Res 179:220–233

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J (1996) Group decision making via intuitionistic fuzzy sets. In: Proceedings of FUBEST’96, October 9–11, Sofia, Bulgaria, pp 107–112

  8. Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J (1996) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets in group decision making. NIFS 2(1):15–32

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J (1997) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets for more realistic group decision making. In: Proceedings of international conference on transition to advanced market institutions and economies, Warsaw, June 18–21, pp 430–433

  10. Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J (2002) Using intuitionistic fuzzy sets in group decision making. Control Cybern 31:1037–1053

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J (2004) Medical diagnostic reasoning using a similarity measure for intutionistic fuzzy sets. In: Eighth international conference on IFSs, Varna, 20–21 June 2004, NIFS, vol 10, no 4, pp 61–69

  12. Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J (2004) A similarity measure for intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application in supporting medical diagnostic reasoning. In: Rutkowski L, Siekmann JH, Tadeusiewicz R, Zadeh LA (eds) ICAISC 2004, LNAI, 3070. Springer, Berlin, pp 388–393

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kmaral A (2009) Homopathic drug selection using intutionistic fuzzy sets. Homeopathy 98:35–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mukherjee S, Basu K (2011) Solving intutionistic fuzzy assignment problem by using similarity measures and score functions. Int J Pure Sci Technol 2(1):118

    Google Scholar 

  15. Boran FE (2011) An integrated intuitionistic fuzzy multicriteria decision making method for facility location selection. Math Comput Appl 16(2):487–496

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang P (2009) QoS-aware web services selection with intuitionistic fuzzy set under consumers vague perception. Expert Syst Appl 36:4460–4466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Guo Z, Qi M, Zhao X (2010) A new approach based on intuitionistic fuzzy set for selection of suppliers. In: Proceedings of IEEE 2010 sixth international conference on Natural Computation, pp 3715–3718

  18. Pappis CP, Karakapilidis NI (1993) A comparative assessment of measures of similarity fuzzy values. Fuzzy Sets Syst 56(2):171–174

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen SM (1995) Measures of similarity between vague sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 74(2):217–223

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen SM (1997) Similarity measures between vague sets and between elements. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 27(1):153–158

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Hong DH, Kim C (1999) A note on similarity measures between vague sets and between elements. Inf Sci 115(14):83–96

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J (2001) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets in intelligent data analysis for medical diagnosis. In: Alexandrov VN, Dongarra JJ, Juliano BA, Renner RS, Tan CJK (eds) ICCS 2001, LNCS, vol 2074, Springer, Berlin, pp 263–271

  23. Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J (2001) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets in some medical applications. In: Proceedings of fifth international conference on IFSs Sofia, 22–23 Sept 2001, notes of IFS, vol 7, no 4, pp 58–64

  24. Fan I, Zhangyan X (2001) Similarity measures between vague sets. J Softw 12(6):922–927 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Li Y, Zhongxian C, Degin Y (2002) Similarity measures between vague sets and vague entropy. J Comput Sci 29(12):129–132 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Li Y, Olson D, Qin Z (2007) Similarity measures between intuitionistic fuzzy (vague) sets. A comparative analysis. Pattern Recognit Lett 28(2):278–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang C et al (2003) The measures of similarity between vague sets. Comput Eng Appl 39(17):92–94 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhizhen L, Pengfei S (2003) Similariity measures on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Pattern Recognit Lett 24(15):2687–2693

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J (1997) On measuring distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Notes IFS 3(4):1–13

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J (2000) Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 114(3):505–518

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. De SK, Biswas R, Roy AR (2001) An application of intuitionistic fuzzy sets in medical diagnosis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 117(2):209–213

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. De Baets B, De Meyer H (2001) The Frank t-norm family in fuzzy similarity measurement. In: Proceedings of EUSFLAT Conference 2001, pp 249–252

  33. Iancu I (2014) Intuitionistic fuzzy similarity measures based on Frank t-norms family. Pattern Recognit Lett 42:128–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang C, Fu H (2006) Similarity measures on three kinds of fuzzy sets. Pattern Recognit Lett 27(12):1307–1317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Baccour L, Alimi AM, John RI (2013) Similarity measures for intuitionistic fuzzy sets: state of art. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 24(1):37–49

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Chen SM, Randyanto J (2013) A novel similarity measures between intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its applications. Int J Pattern Recognit Artif Intell 27(7):1350021 (34 pages)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang WJ (1997) New similarity measures on fuzzy sets and on elements. Fuzzy Sets Syst 85:305–309

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Hung WL, Yang MS (2008) On similarity measures between intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 23:364–384

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Intarapaiboon P (2014) New similarity measures for intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Appl Math Sci 8(45):2239–2250

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hung WL, Yang MS (2004) Similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on Hausdorff distance. Pattern Recognit Lett 25:1603–1611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Xu Z (2007) Some similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications to multiple attribute decision making. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 6:109–121

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Khatibi V, Montazer GA (2009) Intuitionistic fuzzy set vs. fuzzy set application in medical pattern recognition. Artif Intell Med 47:43–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hwang CM, Yang MS (2012) Modified cosine similarity measure between intuitionistic fuzzy sets. In: Proceedings of 4th international conference (AICI 2012), Chengdu, China, pp 285–293

  44. Papakostas GA et al (2013) Distance and similarity measures between intuitionistic fuzzy sets: a comparative analysis from a pattern recognition point of view. Pattern Recognit Lett 34:1609–1622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Atanassov K (1999) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets: theory and applications. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Liang Z, Shi P (2003) Similarity measures on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Pattern Recognit Lett 24(15):2687–2693

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Wang W, Xin X (2003) Distance measures between intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Pattern Recognit Lett 26(13):2063–2069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Hung WL, Yang MS (2003) Similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on Hausdorff distance. Pattern Recognit Lett 25(14):1603–1611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Hung WL, Yang MS (2007) Similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on \(L_p\) metric. Int J Approx Reason 46(1):120–136

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  50. Mitchell HB (2003) On the Dengfeng–Chuntian similarity measure and its application to pattern recognition. Pattern Recognit Lett 24(15):3101–3104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Yusoff B, Taib I, Abdullah L, Wahab AF (2011) A new similarity measure on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int J Comput Math Sci 5(2):70–74

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  52. Khalesi R, Babazadeh E (2011) Pattern recognition by using intuitionistic fuzzy concepts. J Math Comput Sci 2(3):307–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Ye L (2011) Cosine similarity measures for intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications. Math Comput Model 53(102):91–97

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. Julian P, Hung KC, Lin SJ (2012) On the Mitchell similarity measure and its application to pattern recognition. Pattern Recognit Lett 33(9):1219–1223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Sarkar M (2002) Rough-fuzzy functions in classification. Fuzzy Sets Syst 132(3):353–369

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. Vlachos IK, Sergiadis GD (2007) Intuitionistic fuzzy information—applications to pattern recognition. Pattern Recognit Lett 28:197–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Gerstenkorn T, Manko J (1991) Correlation of intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 44:39–43

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author is grateful to the referees for their valuable comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ion Iancu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Iancu, I. Intuitionistic fuzzy similarity measures based on min–max operators. Pattern Anal Applic 22, 429–438 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10044-017-0636-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10044-017-0636-5

Keywords

Navigation