Skip to main content
Log in

Discriminative ridge regression algorithm for adaptation in statistical machine translation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pattern Analysis and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a simple and reliable method for estimating the log-linear weights of a state-of-the-art machine translation system, which takes advantage of the method known as discriminative ridge regression (DRR). Since inappropriate weight estimations lead to a wide variability of translation quality results, reaching a reliable estimate for such weights is critical for machine translation research. For this reason, a variety of methods have been proposed to reach reasonable estimates. In this paper, we present an algorithmic description and empirical results proving that DRR is able to provide comparable translation quality when compared to state-of-the-art estimation methods [i.e. MERT (Och in Proceedings of the annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, 2003) and MIRA (Cherry and Foster in Proceedings of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics, 2012)], with a reduction in computational cost. Moreover, the empirical results reported are coherent across different corpora and language pairs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. www.aclweb.org/anthology/P/P16/.

References

  1. Barrachina S, Bender O, Casacuberta F, Civera J, Cubel E, Khadivi S, Lagarda A, Ney H, Tomás J, Vidal E et al (2009) Statistical approaches to computer-assisted translation. Comput Ling 35(1):3–28

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bojar O, Buck C, Federmann C, Haddow B, Koehn P, Monz C, Post M, Specia L (eds) (2014) Proceedings of the ninth workshop on statistical machine translation. Association for Computational Linguistics

  3. Brown PF, Pietra VJD, Pietra SAD, Mercer RL (1993) The mathematics of statistical machine translation: parameter estimation. Comput Ling 19:263–311

    Google Scholar 

  4. Callison-Burch C, Koehn P, Monz C, Peterson K, Przybocki M, Zaidan OF (2010) Findings of the 2010 joint workshop on statistical machine translation and metrics for machine translation. In: Proceedings of the annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, pp 17–53

  5. Chen B, Cherry C (2014) A systematic comparison of smoothing techniques for sentence-level bleu. In: Proceedings of the workshop on statistical machine translation, pp 362–367

  6. Cherry C, Foster G (2012) Batch tuning strategies for statistical machine translation. In: Proceedings of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics, pp 427–436

  7. Clark JH, Dyer C, Lavie A, Smith NA (2011) Better hypothesis testing for statistical machine translation: controlling for optimizer instability. In: Proceedings of the annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, pp 176–181

  8. Crammer K, Dekel O, Keshet J, Shalev-Shwartz S, Singer Y (2006) Online passive-aggressive algorithms. J Mach Learn Res 7:551–585

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Hasler E, Haddow B, Koehn P (2011) Margin infused relaxed algorithm for moses. Prague Bull Math Ling 96:69–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hopkins M, May J (2011) Tuning as ranking. In: Proceedings of the conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, pp 1352–1362

  11. Kneser R, Ney H (1995) Improved backing-off for m-gram language modeling. In: Proceedings of the international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing, pp 181–184

  12. Koehn P (2005) Europarl: a parallel corpus for statistical machine translation. In: Proceedings of the machine translation summit, pp 79–86

  13. Koehn P (2010) Statistical machine translation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Koehn P, Hoang H, Birch A, Callison-Burch C, Federico M, Bertoldi N, Cowan B, Shen W, Moran C, Zens R, Dyer C, Bojar O, Constantin A, Herbst E (2007) Moses: open source toolkit for statistical machine translation. In: Proceedings of the annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, pp 177–180

  15. Lavie MDA (2014) Meteor universal: language specific translation evaluation for any target language. In: Proceedings of the annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, pp 376–387

  16. Marie B, Max A (2015) Multi-pass decoding with complex feature guidance for statistical machine translation. In: Proceedings of the annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, pp 554–559

  17. Martínez-Gómez P, Sanchis-Trilles G, Casacuberta F (2012) Online adaptation strategies for statistical machine translation in post-editing scenarios. Pattern Recogn 45(9):3193–3203

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Nakov P, Vogel S (2017) Robust tuning datasets for statistical machine translation. arXiv:1710.00346

  19. Neubig G, Watanabe T (2016) Optimization for statistical machine translation: a survey. Comput Ling 42(1):1–54

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Och FJ (2003) Minimum error rate training in statistical machine translation. In: Proceedings of the annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, pp 160–167

  21. Och FJ, Ney H (2003) A systematic comparison of various statistical alignment models. Comput Ling 29:19–51

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Papineni K, Roukos S, Ward T, Zhu WJ (2002) Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In: Proceedings of the international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing, pp 311–318

  23. Sanchis-Trilles G, Casacuberta F (2010) Log-linear weight optimisation via Bayesian adaptation in statistical machine translation. In: Proceedings of the annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, pp 1077–1085

  24. Sanchis-Trilles G, Casacuberta F (2015) Improving translation quality stability using Bayesian predictive adaptation. Comput Speech Lang 34(1):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Snover M, Dorr B, Schwartz R, Micciulla L, Makhoul J (2006) A study of translation edit rate with targeted human annotation. In: Proceedings of the annual meeting of the association for machine translation in the Americas, pp 223–231

  26. Sokolov A, Yvon F (2011) Minimum error rate training semiring. In: Proceedings of the annual conference of the European association for machine translation, pp 241–248

  27. Stauffer C, Grimson WEL (2000) Learning patterns of activity using real-time tracking. Pattern Anal Mach Intell 22(8):747–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Stolcke A (2002) Srilm—an extensible language modeling toolkit. In: Proceedings of the international conference on spoken language processing, pp 901–904

  29. Tiedemann J (2009) News from opus—a collection of multilingual parallel corpora with tools and interfaces. In: Proceedings of the recent advances in natural language processing, pp 237–248

  30. Tiedemann J (2012) Parallel data, tools and interfaces in opus. In: Proceedings of the language resources and evaluation conference, pp 2214–2218

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mara Chinea-Rios.

Additional information

The research leading to these results were partially supported by projects CoMUN-HaT-TIN2015-70924-C2-1-R (MINECO/FEDER) and PROMETEO/2018/004. We also acknowledge NVIDIA for the donation of a GPU used in this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chinea-Rios, M., Sanchis-Trilles, G. & Casacuberta, F. Discriminative ridge regression algorithm for adaptation in statistical machine translation. Pattern Anal Applic 22, 1293–1305 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10044-018-0720-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10044-018-0720-5

Keywords

Navigation