Abstract
Despite decades of development of virtual reality (VR) devices and VR’s recent renaissance, it has been difficult to measure these devices’ effectiveness in immersing the observer. Previously, VR devices have been evaluated using subjective measures of presence, but in this paper, we suggest that postural stability can be used to objectively assess visual fidelity of VR headsets. We validated this measure by testing known differences between the devices. This study also aimed to determine the stability of healthy participants, while in a stable virtual world, compared to eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions and therefore provide a standard of safety requirements for future experimentation. Participants’ ability to maintain a stable centre of pressure was measured using a Wii Balance Board, covered by a foam pad. Stability in eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions was compared with: (1) an iPod Touch in a simple Google cardboard style headset, (2) the Oculus Rift Development Kits (DK) DK1, DK2, with and without the tracking of linear head movements, and (3) the Samsung Gear VR. With a stable VR visual stimulus, the eyes-open condition allowed for significantly greater postural stability than the other conditions, which supports the validity of posturography as a measure of visual fidelity. Further, the iPod Touch, with its narrow field of view and rudimentary software, was significantly less effective at destabilising participants with visual perturbations than the other headsets, with their wider field of view and time warping. Unexpected results are discussed with respect to the possible limitations of the experimental design.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blanks RHI, Fowler CG, Zizz CA, Williams KE (1996) Postural adjustments produced by moving visual (horizontal optokinetic) patterns. J Am Acad Audiol 7:39–48
Bronstein AM, Buckwell D (1997) Automatic control of postural sway by visual motion parallax. Exp Brain Res 113:243–248
Chiarovano E, De Waele C, MacDougall HG, Rogers SJ, Burgess AM, Curthoys IS (2015) Maintaining balance when looking at a virtual reality three dimensional display of a field of moving dots or at a virtual reality scene. Ann NY Acad Sci 6:164–172
Clark RA, Bryant AL, Pua Y, McCrory P, Bennell K, Hunt M (2010) Validity and reliability of the Nintendo Wii Balance board for assessment of standing balance. Gait Posture 31:307–310
Czernuszenko M, Pape D, Sandin D, DeFanti T, Dawe GL, Brown MD (1997) The ImmersaDesk and infinity wall projection-based virtual reality displays. ACM SIGGRAPH Comput Graph 31:46–49
Diener HC, Dichgans J, Bacher M, Gompf B (1984) Quantification of postural sway in normals and patients with cerebellar diseases. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 57:134–142
Duarte M, Freitas SM (2010) Revision of posturography based on force plate for balance evaluation. Braz J Phys Ther 14:183–192
Elliot DB, Patla AE, Flanagan JG, Spaulding S, Rietdyk S, Strong G, Brown S (1995) The waterloo vision and mobility study: postural control strategies in subjects with ARM. Ophthal Physl Opt 15:553–559
Freeman J, Avons SE, Pearson DE, IJsselsteijn WA (1999) Effects of sensory information and prior experience on direct subjective ratings of presence. Presence 8:1–13
Goble DJ, Cone BL, Fling BW (2014) Using the Wii fit as a tool for balance assessment and neurorehabilitation: the first half decade of “Wii-search”. J Neuroeng Rehabil 11:3–11
Goradia I, Doshi J, Kurup L (2014) A review paper on oculus Rift & Project Morpheus. Int J Curr Eng Technol 4:3196–3200
Hytönen M, Pyykkö I, Aalto H, Starck J (1993) Postural control and age. Acta Otolaryngol 113:119–122
Khasnis A, Gokula RM (2003) Romberg’s test. J Postgrad Med 49:169–172
Kruijff E, Swan JE II, Feiner S (2010) Perceptual issues in augmented reality revisited. ISMAR 9:3–12
LaValle SM, Yershova A, Katsev M, Antonov M (2014) Head Tracking for the Oculus Rift. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp 187–194
Macedonia MR, Rosenbloom P (2001) Entertainment technology and military virtual environments. In: RTO Meeting Proceedings 58 - What is essential for virtual reality systems to meet military human performance goals? pp 163–168
Mark WR, McMillan L, Bishop G (1997) Post-Rendering 3D Warping. In: Proceedings of 1997 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics pp 7–16
Nashner LM, Black FO, Wall C 3rd (1982) Adaptation to altered support and visual conditions during stance: patients with vestibular deficits. J Neurosci 2:536–544
Niven JI, Hixson WC, Correia MJ (1966) Elicitation of horizontal nystagmus by periodic linear acceleration. Acta oto-laryngol 62:429–441
Palus WM, Straube A, Brant T (1984) Visual stabilization of posture. Physiol Stimul Charact Clin Asp Brain 107:63
Prieto TE, Myklebust JB, Hoffmann RG, Lovett EG, Myklebust BM (1996) Measures of postural steadiness: differences between healthy young and elderly adults. Biomed Eng IEEE Trans 43:956–966
Riemann BL, Guskiewicz KM, Shields EW (1999) Relationship between clinical and forceplate measures of postural stability. J Sport Rehabil 8:71–82
Roccetti M, Casanova L (2014) Il Senso Di Presenza Nelle Realta Virtuali Vissute Tramite HMD: L’Interazione E Le Interface
Sanchez-Vives MV, Slater M (2005) From presence to consciousness through virtual reality. Nat Rev Neurosci 6:332–339
Sherman WR, Craig AB (2002) Understanding Virtual Reality, Interface, Application and Design. Elsevier Science, San Francisco
Simoneau M, Teasdale N, Bourdin C, Bard C, Fleury M, Nougier V (1999) Aging and postural control: postural perturbations caused by changing the visual anchor. J Am Geriatr Soc 47:235–240
Sjöström E (2015) Virtual reality as a sales tool for industrial companies. Dissertation, Umeå University
Slater M (1999) Measuring presence: a response to the Witmer and Singer presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ 8:560–565
Slater M, Lotto B, Arnold MM, Sánchez-Vives MV (2009) How we experience immersive virtual environments: the concept of presence and its measurement. Anuario de Psicología 40:193–210
Sontisirki S (2014) Special study on virtual reality technology: virtual reality head-mounted display and interaction device. Dissertation, Asian Institute of Technology
Takatalo J, Göte N, Lakksonen L (2008) Components of human experience in virtual environments. Comput Hum Behav 24:1–15
Usoh M, Catena E, Arman S, Slater M (2000) Using presence questionnaires in reality. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ 9:497–503
Vouriot A, Gauchard GC, Chau N, Benamghar L, Lepori ML, Mur JM, Perrin PP (2004) Sensorial organisation favouring higher visual contribution is a risk factor of falls in an occupational setting. Neurosci Res 48:239–247
Winter DA (2004) Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. Wiley, New York
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge funding support from the University of Sydney, School of Psychology (RIBG Pilot Project Grant) and the Garnett Passe and Rodney Williams Memorial Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Menzies, R.J., Rogers, S.J., Phillips, A.M. et al. An objective measure for the visual fidelity of virtual reality and the risks of falls in a virtual environment. Virtual Reality 20, 173–181 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-016-0288-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-016-0288-6