Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The influence of the availability of visual cues on the accurate perception of spatial dimensions in architectural virtual environments

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virtual Reality Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several authors have observed that spatial dimensions tend to be underestimated in virtual environments. In this study, we hypothesize that the availability of visual cues in virtual environments has an influence on the accuracy of perception. An experiment was conducted to compare spatial perception in real and virtual environments that were modeled differently and visualized using a head-mounted display. Results suggest that the greater the availability of visual cues, the greater the level of accuracy in the estimates, especially for egocentric dimensions (p < 0.001). In the end, this study contributes to a better understanding of how architectural virtual environments should be modeled for use in professional or commercial applications where accurate and reliable simulations are required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrus SM, Gaylor G, Bodenheimer B (2014) Distance estimation in virtual environments using different HMDs. In: Proceedings of the ACM symposium on applied perception. ACM, pp 130

  • Armbrüster C, Wolter M, Kuhlen T, Spijkers W, Fimm B (2008) Depth perception in virtual reality: distance estimations in peri-and extrapersonal space. Cyberpsychol Behav 11(1):9–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beall AC, Loomis JM, Philbeck JW, Fikes TG (1995) Absolute motion parallax weakly determines visual scale in real and virtual environments. In: IS&T/SPIE’s symposium on electronic imaging: science & technology. International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp 288–297

  • Bruder G, Pusch A, Steinicke F (2012) Analyzing effects of geometric rendering parameters on size and distance estimation in on-axis stereographics. In: Proceedings of the ACM symposium on applied perception. ACM, pp 111–118

  • Bruder G, Sanz FA, Olivier AH, Lécuyer A (2015) Distance estimation in large immersive projection systems, revisited. In: Virtual reality (VR), 2015 IEEE. IEEE, pp 27–32

  • Bruder G, Argelaguet F, Olivier AH, Lécuyer A (2016) Cave size matters: effects of screen distance and parallax on distance estimation in large immersive display setups. Presence 25(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cidota MA, Clifford RM, Lukosch SG, Billinghurst M (2016) Using visual effects to facilitate depth perception for spatial tasks in virtual and augmented reality. In: Mixed and augmented reality (ISMAR-adjunct), 2016 IEEE international symposium on. IEEE, pp 172–177

  • Creem-Regehr SH, Willemsen P, Gooch AA, Thompson WB (2005) The influence of restricted viewing conditions on egocentric distance perception: implications for real and virtual environments. Perception 34(2):191–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creem-Regehr SH, Stefanucci JK, Thompson WB, Nash N, McCardell M (2015) Egocentric distance perception in the oculus rift (dk2). In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on applied perception. ACM, pp 47–50

  • Cutting JE, Vishton PM (1995) Perceiving layout and knowing distances: the integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. u: Epstein W

  • Gäbling T (1970) Studies in visual perception of architectural spaces and rooms. Scand J Psychol 11(1):133–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard IP (2012) Perceiving in depth. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Imamoglu V (1970) The relation between room organization and spaciousness. Science 5:187–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Imamoglu V (1973) The effect of furniture density or the subjective evaluation of spaciousness and estimation of size of rooms. In: Küller R (ed) Architectural psychology. Hutchinson and Ross, inc., Dowdon, pp 314–352

  • Interrante V, Ries B, Lindquist J, Kaeding M, Anderson L (2008) Elucidating factors that can facilitate veridical spatial perception in immersive virtual environments. Presence 17(2):176–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones JA, Swan II JE, Singh G, Ellis SR (2011) Peripheral visual information and its effect on distance judgments in virtual and augmented environments. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on applied perception in graphics and visualization. ACM, pp 29–36

  • Kaye SM, Murray MA (1982) Evaluations of an architectural space as a function of variations in furniture arrangement, furniture density, and windows. Hum Factors 24(5):609–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellner F, Bolte B, Bruder G, Rautenberg U, Steinicke F, Lappe M, Koch R (2012) Geometric calibration of head-mounted displays and its effects on distance estimation. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 18(4):589–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenyon RV, Sandin D, Smith RC, Pawlicki R, Defanti T (2007) Size-constancy in the CAVE. Presence 16(2):172–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp JM, Loomis JM (2004) Limited field of view of head-mounted displays is not the cause of distance underestimation in virtual environments. Presence (Camb) 13(5):572–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl SA, Creem-Regehr SH, Thompson WB (2006) Individual differences in accuracy of blind walking to targets on the floor. J Vis 6(6):726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunnapas T (1968) Distance perception as a function of available visual cues. J Exp Psychol 77(4):523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunz BR, Wouters L, Smith D, Thompson WB, Creem-Regehr SH (2009) Revisiting the effect of quality of graphics on distance judgments in virtual environments: a comparison of verbal reports and blind walking. Atten Percept Psychophys 71(6):1284–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langbehn E, Raupp T, Bruder G, Steinicke F, Bolte B, Lappe M (2016) Visual blur in immersive virtual environments: does depth of field or motion blur affect distance and speed estimation? In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM conference on virtual reality software and technology. ACM, pp 241–250

  • Lappin JS, Shelton AL, Rieser JJ (2006) Environmental context influences visually perceived distance. Percept Psychophys 68(4):571–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin CJ, Woldegiorgis BH, Caesaron D, Cheng LY (2015) Distance estimation with mixed real and virtual targets in stereoscopic displays. Displays 36:41–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loomis JM, Knapp JM (2003) Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. Virtual Adaptive Environ 11:21–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis JM, Philbeck JW (2008) Measuring spatial perception with spatial updating and action. In: Carnegie symposium on cognition, 2006, Pittsburgh, PA, US. Psychology Press

  • Luo X, Kenyon RV, Kamper DG, Sandin DJ, DeFanti TA (2009) On the determinants of size-constancy in a virtual environment. Int J Virtual Real 8(1):43–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria SM, Kinney JAS, Weissman S (1967) Distance estimates with “filled” and “unfilled” space. Percept Mot Skills 24(3):1007–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh WE, Chardonnet JR, Merienne F (2014) Virtual distance estimation in a CAVE. In: International conference on spatial cognition. Springer International Publishing, pp 354–369

  • Messing R, Durgin FH (2005) Distance perception and the visual horizon in head-mounted displays. ACM Trans Appl Percept (TAP) 2(3):234–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murgia A, Sharkey PM (2009) Estimation of distances in virtual environments using size constancy. Int J Virtual Real 8(1):67–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng AK, Chan LK, Lau HY (2016) Depth perception in virtual environment: The effects of immersive system and freedom of movement. In: International conference on virtual, augmented and mixed reality. Springer International Publishing, pp 173–183

  • Oberfeld D, Hecht H, Gamer M (2010) Surface lightness influences perceived room height. Q J Exp Psychol 63(10):1999–2011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philbeck JW, Loomis JM (1997) Comparison of two indicators of perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 23(1):72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piryankova IV, De La Rosa S, Kloos U, Bülthoff HH, Mohler BJ (2013) Egocentric distance perception in large screen immersive displays. Displays 34(2):153–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proffitt D, Caudek C (2002) Depth perception and the perception of events. In: Healy AF, Proctor RW (eds) Handbook of psychology, vol 4. Experimental psychology. New Jersey, Wiley

  • Renner RS, Velichkovsky BM, Helmert JR (2013a) The perception of egocentric distances in virtual environments-a review. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR) 46(2):23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renner RS, Velichkovsky BM, Helmert JR, Stelzer RH (2013b) Measuring interpupillary distance might not be enough. In: Proceedings of the ACM symposium on applied perception. ACM, pp 130–130

  • Rieser JJ, Ashmead DH, Talor CR, Youngquist GA (1990) Visual perception and the guidance of locomotion without vision to previously seen targets. Perception 19(5):675–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinett W, Rolland JP (1992) A computational model for the stereoscopic optics of a head-mounted display. Presence 1(1):45–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuemie MJ, Van Der Straaten P, Krijn M, Van Der Mast CA (2001) Research on presence in virtual reality: a survey. Cyber Psychol Behav 4(2):183–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serpa A, Muhar A (1996) Effects of plant size, texture and colour on spatial perception in public green areas—a cross-cultural study. Landsc Urban Plan 36(1):19–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinai MJ, Ooi TL, He ZJ (1998) Terrain influences the accurate judgement of distance. Nature 395(6701):497–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinisgalli R (2012) Perspective in the visual culture of classical antiquity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stamps AE (2010) Effects of area, height, elongation, and color on perceived spaciousness. Environ Behav 43(2):252–273

  • Steinicke F, Bruder G, Kuhl S (2011) Realistic perspective projections for virtual objects and environments. ACM Trans Graph (TOG) 30(5):112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Surdick RT, Davis ET, King RA, Hodges LF (1997) The perception of distance in simulated visual displays- A comparison of the effectiveness and accuracy of multiple depth cues across viewing distances. Presence 6(5):513–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tai NC (2012) Daylighting and its impact on depth perception in a daylit space. J Light Visual Environ 36(1):16–22

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas G, Goldberg JH, Cannon DJ, Hillis SL (2002) Surface textures improve the robustness of stereoscopic depth cues. Hum Factors 44(1):157–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson WK, Willemsen P, Gooch A, Creem-Regehr SH, Loomis JM, Beall AC (2004) Does the quality of the computer graphics matter when judging distances in visually immersive environments? Presence 13(5):560–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Castell C, Oberfeld D, Hecht H (2014) The effect of furnishing on perceived spatial dimensions and spaciousness of interior space. PLoS ONE 9:e113267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willemsen P, Gooch A (2002) Perceived egocentric distances in real, image-based, and traditional virtual environments. In: Virtual reality, 2002. Proceedings. IEEE. IEEE, pp 275–276

  • Willemsen P, Gooch AA, Thompson WB, Creem-Regehr SH (2008) Effects of stereo viewing conditions on distance perception in virtual environments. Presence 17(1):91–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willemsen P, Colton MB, Creem-Regehr SH, Thompson WB (2009) The effects of head-mounted display mechanical properties and field of view on distance judgments in virtual environments. ACM Trans Appl Percept (TAP) 6(2):8

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt JK, Stefanucci JK, Riener CR, Proffitt DR (2007) Seeing beyond the target: environmental context affects distance perception. Perception 36(12):1752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young MK, Gaylor GB, Andrus SM, Bodenheimer B (2014) A comparison of two cost-differentiated virtual reality systems for perception and action tasks. In: Proceedings of the ACM symposium on applied perception. ACM, pp 83–90

Download references

Acknowledgements

My greatest thanks to Max Daiber, from La Imaginería VR Ltda., to Prof. Sander van der Linden from Princeton Department of Psychology, and to Professors Forrest Meggers and Axel Kilian from the Princeton School of Architecture for their valuable help during the design and analysis of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Princeton University, Princeton, USA

    Mauricio Loyola

Authors
  1. Mauricio Loyola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mauricio Loyola.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Loyola, M. The influence of the availability of visual cues on the accurate perception of spatial dimensions in architectural virtual environments. Virtual Reality 22, 235–243 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-017-0331-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-017-0331-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation