Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Do virtual reality head-mounted displays make a difference? A comparison of presence and self-efficacy between head-mounted displays and desktop computer-facilitated virtual environments

  • S.I. : VR in Education
  • Published:
Virtual Reality Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Virtual reality (VR) has made it possible for users to access novel digital experiences. An interesting question that arises in the context of VR is whether it appears or feels different to users when different virtual environments are used. This study investigates the effect of VR head-mounted display (HMD) and desktop computer-facilitated VR on users’ sense of presence (spatial presence and immersion) and task-oriented self-efficacy when exposed to an earthquake education VR system. A quasi-experiment design was used with a sample of 96 university students. The results revealed that the VR system had positive impacts on the users’ earthquake preparedness self-efficacy. Although the experiment group (n = 39) had repeated experiences, as they first used desktop VR followed by VR HMD for the same content, users indicated a higher sense of spatial presence and immersion while using VR HMD than when using desktop VR. In addition, a VR HMD single-group pre- and posttest experimental design was performed with 20 participants, and the differences between the pretest and posttest measurements of earthquake preparedness and self-efficacy were determined to be significant. The qualitative results reveal that the visual stimulus and motion are relevant in composing the VR experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen RJ, Waterman AH (2015) How does enactment affect the ability to follow instructions in working memory? Mem Cogn 43(3):555–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anglin J, Saldana D, Schmiesing A, Liew SL (2017) Transfer of a skilled motor learning task between virtual and conventional environments. In: Virtual reality (VR), 2017 IEEE, March, pp 401–402

  • Annetta LA, Minogue J, Holmes SY, Cheng MT (2009) Investigating the impact of video games on high school students’ engagement and learning about genetics. Comput Educ 53(1):74–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A (1986) The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. J Soc Clin Psychol 4(3):359–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown E, Cairns P (2004) A grounded investigation of game immersion. In: CHI’04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, April, pp 1297–1300

  • Buń P, Górski F, Wichniarek R, Kuczko W, Hamrol A, Zawadzki P (2015) Application of professional and low-cost head mounted devices in immersive educational application. Procedia Comput Sci 75:173–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou YS, Hou HT, Yu MC, Lee HJ, Wu HS, Yang YT, Liao YJ (2012) Running Tommy©: developing a digital adventure game based on situated learning to promote learners’ concepts of earthquake escape. In: Digital game and intelligent toy enhanced learning (DIGITEL), 2012 IEEE fourth international conference on, IEEE, March, pp 156–158

  • Dede C (2009) Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science 323(5910):66–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diemer J, Alpers GW, Peperkorn HM, Shiban Y, Mühlberger A (2015) The impact of perception and presence on emotional reactions: a review of research in virtual reality. Front Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heeter C (2000) Interactivity in the context of designed experiences. J Interact Advert 1(1):3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrix C, Barfield W (1996) Presence within virtual environments as a function of visual display parameters. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 5(3):274–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou J, Nam Y, Peng W, Lee K (2012) Effects of screen size, viewing angle, and players' immersion tendencies on game experience. Comput Human Behav 28(2):617–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang HM, Liaw SS, Lai CM (2016) Exploring learner acceptance of the use of virtual reality in medical education: a case study of desktop and projection-based display systems. Interact Learn Environ 24(1):3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang S, Vitale JM, Jyung RW, Black JB (2017) Direct manipulation is better than passive viewing for learning anatomy in a three-dimensional virtual reality environment. Comput Educ 106:150–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennett C, Cox AL, Cairns P, Dhoparee S, Epps A, Tijs T, Walton A (2008) Measuring and defining the experience of immersion in games. Int J Hum Comput Stud 66(9):641–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraiger K, Ford JK, Salas E (1993) Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. J Appl Psychol 78(2):311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lan Y-J, Hsiao IYT, Shih MF (2018) Effective learning design of game-based 3D virtual language learning environments for special education students. Educ Technol Soc 21(3):213–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarowitz R, Hertz-Lazarowitz R, Baird JH (1994) Learning science in a cooperative setting: academic achievement and affective outcomes. J Res Sci Teach 31(10):1121–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leong A, Herst P, Kane P (2018) VERT, virtual clinical environment: enhances understanding of radiation therapy-planning concepts. J Med Radiat Sci 65(2):97–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin T-J, Lan Y-J (2015) Language learning in virtual environments: past, present, and future. Educ Technol Soc 18(4):486–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombard M, Ditton T (1997) At the heart of it all: the concept of presence. J Comput Med Commun 3(2):0–0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombard M, Ditton TB, Weinstein L (2009) Measuring presence: the temple presence inventory. In: Proceedings of the 12th annual international workshop on presence, November, pp 1–15

  • Makransky G, Lilleholt L, Aaby A (2017) Development and validation of the Multimodal Presence Scale for virtual reality environments: a confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory approach. Comput Human Behav 72:276–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messinis I, Saltaouras D, Pintelas P, Mikropoulos T (2010) Investigation of the relation between interaction and sense of presence in educational virtual environments. In: e-Education, e-Business, e-Management, and e-Learning, 2010. IC4E’10. International conference on. IEEE, January, pp 428–431

  • Mikropoulos TA (2006) Presence: a unique characteristic in educational virtual environments. Virtual Real 10(3–4):197–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss JD, Austin J, Salley J, Coats J, Williams K, Muth ER (2011) The effects of display delay on simulator sickness. Displays 32(4):159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulilis JP, Duval TS, Lippa R (1990) The effects of a large destructive local earthquake on earthquake preparedness as assessed by an earthquake preparedness scale. Nat Hazards 3(4):357–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parong J, Mayer R (2018) Learning science in immersive virtual reality. J Educ Psychol 110(6):785–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick E, Cosgrove D, Slavkovic A, Rode JA, Verratti T, Chiselko G (2000) Using a large projection screen as an alternative to head-mounted displays for virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, April, pp 478–485

  • Persky S, Kaphingst KA, McCall C, Lachance C, Beall AC, Blascovich J (2009) Presence relates to distinct outcomes in two virtual environments employing different learning modalities. CyberPsychology Behav 12(3):263–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prensky M (2003) Digital game-based learning. Comput Entertain 1(1):21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos BS, Dias P, Pimentel A, Baggerman JW, Ferreira C, Silva S, Madeira J (2009) Head-mounted display versus desktop for 3D navigation in virtual reality: a user study. Multimed Tools Appl 41(1):161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharples S, Cobb S, Moody A, Wilson JR (2008) Virtual reality induced symptoms and effects (VRISE): comparison of head mounted display (HMD), desktop and projection display systems. Displays 29(2):58–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater M (2003) A note on presence terminology. Presence Connect 3(3):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamaddon K, Stiefs D (2017) Embodied experiment of levitation in microgravity in a simulated virtual reality environment for science learning. In: K-12 embodied learning through virtual & augmented reality (KELVAR), 2017 IEEE virtual reality workshop on, IEEE, March, pp 1–5

  • Tanes Z, Cho H (2013) Goal setting outcomes: examining the role of goal interaction in influencing the experience and learning outcomes of video game play for earthquake preparedness. Comput Hum Behav 29(3):858–869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toumpaniari K, Loyens S, Mavilidi MF, Paas F (2015) Preschool children’s foreign language vocabulary learning by embodying words through physical activity and gesturing. Educ Psychol Rev 27(3):445–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YF, Petrina S, Feng F (2017) VILLAGE—virtual immersive language learning and gaming environment: immersion and presence. Br J Edu Technol 48(2):431–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson J (1997) Effects of personal resource sufficiency on perceived difficulty and desirability of earthquake preparedness (Master’s thesis). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 1389984)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Changhua University of Education, Changhua, Taiwan

    Yu Shu & Shu-Hsuan Chang

  2. National Taichung University of Science and Technology, Taichung, Taiwan

    Yen-Zhang Huang & Mu-Yen Chen

Authors
  1. Yu Shu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yen-Zhang Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shu-Hsuan Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mu-Yen Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mu-Yen Chen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shu, Y., Huang, YZ., Chang, SH. et al. Do virtual reality head-mounted displays make a difference? A comparison of presence and self-efficacy between head-mounted displays and desktop computer-facilitated virtual environments. Virtual Reality 23, 437–446 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0376-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0376-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation